Hi,

On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 10:10:43AM +0200, Eike Lohmann wrote:
> My mistake, didn't checked that you allready did my math. ;)
> Do you have experience with changing"#define IFCONFIG_POOL_MIN_NETBITS
> 16", is it realy so simple?

I haven't tested it, but from looking at the code, it should work.

> The best way for me would be to define 2 different /16 networks on one
> server/instance.
> E.g. 172.16.0.0/16 and 10.1.0.0/16

Well, this really depends on what you want to do with it.  If you want
to do static assignments (ifconfig-push in ccd/ or via radius-plugin),
this can be done today.  If you want the ifconfig-pool to span two 
different networks, this can not be done today - there can only be one 
pool, and it must be contiguous.

> Is it possible to add this to the wishlist for the next community meetings?

Well, the community meeting is not "please go and implement this for me",
it's more "I want to implement this, what do you think about it?" (and
"there's a *bug*, how can we fix this?").

So you're welcome to send patches and if the patch is OK, it's likely
to go into 2.3

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de

Attachment: pgpvUQ4qB9vbN.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to