>> Here it is, against the current master branch.
>
> Thanks for re-sending. Unfortunately, it's not complete - it adds
> "remote_end", but never initializes it in the TARGET_FREEBSD branch.
>
> So it sort of works because it happens to puts 0.0.0.0 (or even random
> stack data) into "remote_en
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 04:26:30PM +0200, Adam wrote:
> Here it is, against the current master branch.
Thanks for re-sending. Unfortunately, it's not complete - it adds
"remote_end", but never initializes it in the TARGET_FREEBSD branch.
So it sort of works because it happens to puts 0.0.0.
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 04:33:13PM +0200, Adam wrote:
>> It turns out, NetBSD needs similar handling of subnet topology for tun
>> interfaces as OpenBSD does.
>>
>> Here is a patch to fix the issue (against OpenVPN 2.4.6):
>
> So, the patch looks good, and it works nicely on my buildslave.
>
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 04:33:13PM +0200, Adam wrote:
> It turns out, NetBSD needs similar handling of subnet topology for tun
> interfaces as OpenBSD does.
>
> Here is a patch to fix the issue (against OpenVPN 2.4.6):
So, the patch looks good, and it works nicely on my buildslave.
There's
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 04:51:53PM +0200, Adam wrote:
> Hoping that clarifies your concern. :)
It leaves me a bit puzzled, to be honest... our buildbots *should*
have caught it (NetBSD 5.1/amd64 and NetBSD 7.0.1/i386), as it runs a
"topology subnet" test and tries to ping the remote IP and
>> It turns out, NetBSD needs similar handling of subnet topology for tun
>> interfaces as OpenBSD does.
>>
>> Here is a patch to fix the issue (against OpenVPN 2.4.6):
>
> This comes as a bit of surprise - has something changed here on the
> NetBSD side? Which NetBSD version did you test this
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 04:33:13PM +0200, Adam wrote:
> It turns out, NetBSD needs similar handling of subnet topology for tun
> interfaces as OpenBSD does.
>
> Here is a patch to fix the issue (against OpenVPN 2.4.6):
This comes as a bit of surprise - has something changed here on the
NetB
Hello Adam,
thanks for your change.
could you please submit the patch in proper git format so that it can be
easily applied?
You can create a patch like that by using the "git format-patch" command
after you have commited your changes (you need to clone the git
repository for that).
After creat