On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,,
>
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 11:38:28PM -0500, Selva Nair wrote:
> > Responding to this old version just to be on record.
> >
> > I realized patch this was assigned to Gert on patchwork too late after
> > started responding on my own. Sorr
Hi,,
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 11:38:28PM -0500, Selva Nair wrote:
> Responding to this old version just to be on record.
>
> I realized patch this was assigned to Gert on patchwork too late after
> started responding on my own. Sorry for jumping the gun. Have to make
> keeping an eye on patchwork
Hi,
On 03/12/17 12:38, Selva Nair wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Responding to this old version just to be on record.
>
> I realized patch this was assigned to Gert on patchwork too late after
> started responding on my own. Sorry for jumping the gun. Have to make
> keeping an eye on patchwork a habit..
No p
Hi,
Responding to this old version just to be on record.
I realized patch this was assigned to Gert on patchwork too late after
started responding on my own. Sorry for jumping the gun. Have to make
keeping an eye on patchwork a habit..
I'll leave the latest v4 alone.
cheers,
Selva
Hi,
On 03/12/17 04:27, Selva Nair wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 3:54 AM, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
>
>> Similarly to ifconfig(-push), its IPv6 counterpart is now able to
>> accept hostnames as well instead of IP addresses in numeric form.
>>
>
> If dns names currently work for ifconfi
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 3:54 AM, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> Similarly to ifconfig(-push), its IPv6 counterpart is now able to
> accept hostnames as well instead of IP addresses in numeric form.
>
If dns names currently work for ifconfig-push (I didn't know), makes sense
to
support it for ip
