Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

On Friday, 17 February 2017 18:18:27 CEST David Sommerseth wrote: > On 17/02/17 17:35, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: > > I understand that I'm the new guy in town, but can you allow me to > > make the formal request to ditch OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 and > > require at least version 1.0.2? > > So t

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

2017-02-19 9:48 GMT+05:00 Илья Шипицин : > > > 2017-02-19 4:16 GMT+05:00 David Sommerseth topphemmelig.net>: > >> On 18/02/17 08:34, Илья Шипицин wrote: >> > I added openssl-1.0.1e to test matrix (do not pay attention to >> > commit title, it happened accidently from iPad), so ... >> > >>

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

On 13/02/17 21:16, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 13/02/17 20:50, Christian Hesse wrote: >> And a lot more has to be done... There's a long list of packages to be >> fixed. Sadly openssl developers do not care about ABI and API stability >> or compatibility. :( > > I do understand the frustration ..

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

David Sommerseth on Sat, 2017/02/18 02:52: > On 17/02/17 22:59, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: > > I'm not targetting 2.4 -- my work is done on the current master. Adding > > hundreds of lines to the current 2.4 for the purpose of supporting a > > library which is not yet present on the user systems does

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

Hi, On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 04:12:02PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > But things may change again. I heard recently that Red Hat is migrating > over to OpenVPN as the only internal IT supported VPN solution. So > about 10k employees will soon depend on OpenVPN for their daily VPN > need. We w

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

On 19/02/17 05:48, Илья Шипицин wrote: > > > 2017-02-19 4:16 GMT+05:00 David Sommerseth > >: > > On 18/02/17 08:34, Илья Шипицин wrote: > > I added openssl-1.0.1e to test matrix (do not pay attention to > > commit title, it happened

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

2017-02-19 4:16 GMT+05:00 David Sommerseth < open...@sf.lists.topphemmelig.net>: > On 18/02/17 08:34, Илья Шипицин wrote: > > I added openssl-1.0.1e to test matrix (do not pay attention to > > commit title, it happened accidently from iPad), so ... > > > > https://travis-ci.org/OpenVPN

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

On 18/02/17 08:34, Илья Шипицин wrote: > I added openssl-1.0.1e to test matrix (do not pay attention to > commit title, it happened accidently from iPad), so ... > > https://travis-ci.org/OpenVPN/openvpn/jobs/202709493 > > t_cltsrv.sh + openssl-1.0.1f = OK > t_cltsrv.sh + openssl-1.0

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

2017-02-17 23:17 GMT+05:00 Илья Шипицин : > > Пт, 17 февр. 2017 г. в 22:21, David Sommerseth topphemmelig.net>: > >> On 17/02/17 17:35, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: >> > >> > Now, I have a question which is related to this. The way I'm doing >> > things, I will make sure that the new code is compatibl

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

On 17/02/17 22:59, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: > I'm not targetting 2.4 -- my work is done on the current master. Adding > hundreds of lines to the current 2.4 for the purpose of supporting a library > which is not yet present on the user systems does not make much sense :) Currently, master and relea

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

Hello, On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 06:37:04PM +0100, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: >> I guess the answer to the riddle is: "how long will the 2.4 branch >> live?". v2.3 shipped in May 2013. If we assume that v2.4 will be the >> stable branch fo

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

Пт, 17 февр. 2017 г. в 22:21, David Sommerseth < open...@sf.lists.topphemmelig.net>: > On 17/02/17 17:35, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: > > > > Now, I have a question which is related to this. The way I'm doing > > things, I will make sure that the new code is compatible with both > > OpenSSL 1.0.x and

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

Am 17.02.2017 um 17:35 schrieb Emmanuel Deloget: > I understand that I'm the new guy in town, but can you allow me to > make the formal request to ditch OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 and > require at least version 1.0.2? 1.0.1 has also gone out of support, and I propose to let the distros sort ou

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

Hi, On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 06:37:04PM +0100, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: > I guess the answer to the riddle is: "how long will the 2.4 branch > live?". v2.3 shipped in May 2013. If we assume that v2.4 will be the > stable branch for two more years (I cannot find any roadmap, so this > is pure specula

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

Hello, On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:35:04PM +0100, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: >> I understand that I'm the new guy in town, but can you allow me to >> make the formal request to ditch OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 and >> require at least

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

On 17/02/17 17:35, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: > > Now, I have a question which is related to this. The way I'm doing > things, I will make sure that the new code is compatible with both > OpenSSL 1.0.x and OpenSSL 1.1. There is a good chance that it will be > compatible with version 0.9.8 as well, ye

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

Hi, On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:35:04PM +0100, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: > I understand that I'm the new guy in town, but can you allow me to > make the formal request to ditch OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 and > require at least version 1.0.2? I'm not going to make a call on any of these versions,

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

Hello, First, sorry for the inconvenience: this message is not attached to the remaining of the discussion (I just joined the ML so I cannot answer to a one week old message). That being said: On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:17:58PM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote: > Arch Linux is about to upgrade openss

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

On 13/02/17 20:50, Christian Hesse wrote: > And a lot more has to be done... There's a long list of packages to be > fixed. Sadly openssl developers do not care about ABI and API stability > or compatibility. :( I do understand the frustration ... but lets be fair too. OpenSSL v1.1 is considered

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

Am 13.02.2017 um 20:50 schrieb Christian Hesse: > And a lot more has to be done... There's a long list of packages to be > fixed. Sadly openssl developers do not care about ABI and API stability > or compatibility. :( Much frustration can be muttered and uttered about OpenSSL and more so of its s

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:33:38 +0100 Gert Doering wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:17:58PM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote: > > Arch Linux is about to upgrade openssl to version 1.1.0. OpenVPN > > does not compile against this version. Did anybody start the work > > to support latest openssl version

Re: [Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

Hi, On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:17:58PM +0100, Christian Hesse wrote: > Arch Linux is about to upgrade openssl to version 1.1.0. OpenVPN does not > compile against this version. Did anybody start the work to support latest > openssl versions? How does Arch deal with OpenSSH (which doesn't compile

[Openvpn-devel] build against openssl 1.1.0

Hello everybody, Arch Linux is about to upgrade openssl to version 1.1.0. OpenVPN does not compile against this version. Did anybody start the work to support latest openssl versions? -- main(a){char*c=/*Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH" "CX:;",b;for(a/*Best regards