On 17/02/17 22:59, Emmanuel Deloget wrote: > I'm not targetting 2.4 -- my work is done on the current master. Adding > hundreds of lines to the current 2.4 for the purpose of supporting a library > which is not yet present on the user systems does not make much sense :)
Currently, master and release/2.4 are fairly close ... so it shouldn't be too hard to cherry-pick stuff from master (which we usually prefer to do). With that said ... I know Fedora have OpenSSL v1.1 support on their wish list for for OpenVPN [1] and I believe Arch Linux guys have also been asking about this too. So the more leading edge distros are moving towards OpenSSL v1.1 as fast as possible [1] <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391544> Fedora is considering (and have builds ready) to temporarily switch to mbed TLS, despite not being as feature rich as OpenSSL ... just to avoid holding anything back. -- kind regards, David Sommerseth OpenVPN Technologies, Inc
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
