On 05/21/2009 01:51:36 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On 5/21/09, Felix Kronlage wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:39:57AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
> > + release openvpn 2.1 without Windows GUI as soon as you believe
it's done
> >* your changelog below suggests that RC16 needs more than
On 5/21/09, Felix Kronlage wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:39:57AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
> > + release openvpn 2.1 without Windows GUI as soon as you believe it's done
> >* your changelog below suggests that RC16 needs more than just
> > a week of testing
> > + stabilize
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:39:57AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> + release openvpn 2.1 without Windows GUI as soon as you believe it's done
>* your changelog below suggests that RC16 needs more than just
> a week of testing
> + stabilize (through beta and RC) the Windows GUI as a separa
Hi,
> We are very close to 2.1. I know there's been some discussion about the
> Windows client GUI, whether it deserves to live in 2.1. We do have a
> new client GUI that we've developed as a part of our Access Server
> product and we are open to releasing it with 2.1, however doing so would
>
On Wed, 20 May 2009, James Yonan wrote:
> We are very close to 2.1. I know there's been some discussion about the
> Windows client GUI, whether it deserves to live in 2.1. We do have a
> new client GUI that we've developed as a part of our Access Server
> product and we are open to releasing
We are very close to 2.1. I know there's been some discussion about the
Windows client GUI, whether it deserves to live in 2.1. We do have a
new client GUI that we've developed as a part of our Access Server
product and we are open to releasing it with 2.1, however doing so would
probably add
