On 05/21/2009 01:51:36 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On 5/21/09, Felix Kronlage <f...@perrin.bytemine.net> wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:39:57AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
> > + release openvpn 2.1 without Windows GUI as soon as you believe
it's done
> > * your changelog below suggests that RC16 needs more than just
> > a week of testing
> > + stabilize (through beta and RC) the Windows GUI as a separate
add-on
> > package (if you want, these test releases can then comprise
2.1_rc,
> > 2.1.0, 2.1.1, ... whichever is current, for user convenience)
>
>
> ack.
> Small and fast release cycles. At least 'fast' compared to now
would
> be nice.
Yes...
OpenVPN has several separate components, each can be released
separately:
It would be much easier if every component has its own version and
dependency.
This makes sense to me.
I'm putting in a vote for releasing as-is (ish) and not making
any major changes until the next release. I've put a lot of time
into working with rc15 in the expectation that there won't be much
in the way of changes for the final 2.1 release. It seems
reasonable to expect major changes on release boundaries.
Violating that expectation would, at minimum, keep me away
from rc releases.
Karl <k...@meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
