David,
A couple issues with the patch:
* sscanf usage doesn't check for buffer overflow.
* You use gw_if_name in some places and gw_ifname in other places. To
eliminate confusion it would be best to use a consistent form.
Also, to reiterate, try submitting the patch as an attachment to deal
On 1/29/09, David Balazic wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I sent a patch recently to the openvpn-devel list and got
> no reply whatsoever. Did I miss something ? Is there a procedure
> that I did not follow ?
Send the patch again.
At the subject specify [PATCH]
Place the patch inline, be sure your mail clien
David Sommerseth a écrit :
> From what I've heard from other sources as well, this is usually the
> normal procedure ... pop the patch to this mailing list and watch
> if something happens ... or not you might get a response, and you
> might not. Who knows ...
It is a good summary of t
David Balazic wrote:
Hi!
I sent a patch recently to the openvpn-devel list and got
no reply whatsoever. Did I miss something ? Is there a procedure
that I did not follow ?
From what I've heard from other sources as well, this is usually the
normal procedure ... pop the patch to this mailing
Hi!
I sent a patch recently to the openvpn-devel list and got
no reply whatsoever. Did I miss something ? Is there a procedure
that I did not follow ?
That patch is to fix a longstanding bug that users encountered.
Regards,
David
PS: the mail message in question is :
Fix for "Cannot read curren