Hi,
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> JuanJo Ciarlante ha scritto:
>> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:20 PM, JuanJo wrote:
>>
>>> - put all #ifdef'd code in place, kill the cpp symbol,
>>> - thus in v2.3 it's not actually possible to --disable-ipv6 :)
>>>
>>> RATIONALE:
>>> #1
JuanJo Ciarlante ha scritto:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:20 PM, JuanJo wrote:
>
>> - put all #ifdef'd code in place, kill the cpp symbol,
>> - thus in v2.3 it's not actually possible to --disable-ipv6 :)
>>
>> RATIONALE:
>> #1 some wacky compilers choke on #ifdef'd constructions for
>>conc
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:20 PM, JuanJo wrote:
> - put all #ifdef'd code in place, kill the cpp symbol,
> - thus in v2.3 it's not actually possible to --disable-ipv6 :)
>
> RATIONALE:
> #1 some wacky compilers choke on #ifdef'd constructions for
> concatenated strings, and given that:
> #2 v2
- put all #ifdef'd code in place, kill the cpp symbol,
- thus in v2.3 it's not actually possible to --disable-ipv6 :)
RATIONALE:
#1 some wacky compilers choke on #ifdef'd constructions for
concatenated strings, and given that:
#2 v2.3 has already transport ipv6 by default
=> doesn't justify