On 25/02/2019 13:10, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> Am 25.02.19 um 07:29 schrieb Stefan Strogin:
> Hm, both have advantages. But if we can fix the rare corner case of
> OpenSSL 1.1.1 without TLS_13 then lets go for the TLS1_3_VERSION variant.
Thanks, I'll use this one then.
> Are there really Libressl ver
Am 25.02.19 um 07:29 schrieb Stefan Strogin:
> Hi Arne,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Please see my comments and a clarifying question below.
>
> On 24/02/2019 03:28, Arne Schwabe wrote:
>> And I
>> am getting quite fed up with way that LibreSSL does API compatiblity. It
>> claims to support OpenSSL
Hi Arne,
Thanks for the reply. Please see my comments and a clarifying question below.
On 24/02/2019 03:28, Arne Schwabe wrote:
> And I
> am getting quite fed up with way that LibreSSL does API compatiblity. It
> claims to support OpenSSL 2.0.0 API when it clearly doesn't.
Sorry, but LibreSSL of
Am 23.02.19 um 19:02 schrieb Stefan Strogin:
> TLS 1.3 is not ready yet in LibreSSL.
> Also SSL_get1_supported_ciphers() has been just added into master (not yet
> released).
So I written already a rant about LibreSSL in this trac ticket
(https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/ticket/1159), I will
TLS 1.3 is not ready yet in LibreSSL.
Also SSL_get1_supported_ciphers() has been just added into master (not yet
released).
Signed-off-by: Stefan Strogin
---
src/openvpn/ssl_openssl.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/openvpn/ssl_openssl.c b/src/openvp
