On 25/02/2019 13:10, Arne Schwabe wrote: > Am 25.02.19 um 07:29 schrieb Stefan Strogin: > Hm, both have advantages. But if we can fix the rare corner case of > OpenSSL 1.1.1 without TLS_13 then lets go for the TLS1_3_VERSION variant.
Thanks, I'll use this one then. > Are there really Libressl versions that do not define > LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER that are worth supporting? Otherwise I would > prefer to have only the LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x2090100fL or > inverted and >,. Need to double check what is true for undefined things. "After all replacements due to macro expansion and the defined unary operator have been performed, all remaining identifiers (including those lexically identical to keywords) are replaced with the pp-number 0" - C99, 6.10.1. So "#if (LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x2090100fL)" will be true with undefined LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER. -- Stefan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openvpn-devel mailing list Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel
