Hi,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:55:25AM +0100, Joerg Willmann wrote:
> The patch attached to #172 solved my problem and seems to be reasonable.
>
> I'm just wondering what it takes to make this issue being accepted. (Sorry
> I didn't find a description of this process in
> wiki/DeveloperDocument
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:55:25AM +0100, Joerg Willmann wrote:
> I was just faced with the problem described in trac issue #172.
> I was trying to use ntlm authentication against a bluecoat proxy server.
> Since the reply string of the bluecoat proxy was too long the same problem
> occurred
Hi,
I was just faced with the problem described in trac issue #172.
I was trying to use ntlm authentication against a bluecoat proxy server.
Since the reply string of the bluecoat proxy was too long the same problem
occurred as described in #172:
"NTLM Proxy-Authorization phase 3 failed: recei
