I want to add, you don't have to include the =name part of the code.
The BBCode will work just fine with [oconf]foo[/oconf].
---
Eric F Crist
On 2017-09-20 05:39, fragmentux wrote:
Another suggestion:
Can you please change [oconf=x] to simply [oconf]
There is enough remaining informati
Switching the forum back from our custom style to the prosilver default
resolves at least the [code] BBCode. I'll look at the differences
tonight.
---
Eric F Crist
On 2017-09-19 09:34, Eric F Crist wrote:
I've uploaded the [oconf] BBcode to github:
https://github.com/ecrist/oco
I've uploaded the [oconf] BBcode to github:
https://github.com/ecrist/oconf
There may be style/template issues on the forum, and I will look into
those based on your other messages.
---
Eric F Crist
On 2017-09-18 16:29, Eric Crist wrote:
The oconf stuff is something I can share. I’ll
Why try to connect to the process itself? I think a standard ICMP ping
to the server address should be sufficient for your test.
---
Eric F Crist
On 2016-05-11 10:41, Paul Garnier wrote:
Hello,
I’m actually trying to add an option in openvpn which will allow the
client to connect to the
I'm the maintainer for easy-rsa. If you have patches or suggestions, I'd be
happy to push sensible ones Fogo the tree.
Matthias Andree wrote:
>Greetings,
>
>I have just added the easy-rsa package to the FreeBSD ports collection,
>security/easy-rsa, and security/openvpn is now optionally (defa
There are a few decision makers who have sent NAKs regarding your patch. This
isn't going to be considered further.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Amm Vpn wrote:
Hi,
First I just wanted to know if you are the decision maker for OpenVPN?
Because, the
This will not work for freebsd. This is what the ports tree is for.
Eric
On Jul 1, 2010, at 09:59:51, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:00:49PM +0300, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
>
>> - write packaging instructions to our Trac wiki
>> (https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/wiki)
>> - c
On Jun 3, 2010, at 12:38:19, chantra wrote:
> Gert Doering greenie.muc.de> writes:
>
>
>> Both have merits, your fix is somewhat less code then adding an extra input
>> validation check
>>
>> if ((network.s_addr & netmask) != network.s_addr )
>>{ complain; }
>>
>> - so: ACK from me.
>
On May 25, 2010, at 07:05:11, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> Interesting links! Integrating the bounty tasks to our established
> development process takes care of the "I'll write something that barely
> works to claim the bounty" issue. Eric's suggestion to handing out the
> bounty money in three phase
Just an FYI - I am currently updating the FreeBSD ports tree every 2 to 3 weeks
with a current development snapshot for the openvpn-devel port. As part of
this process, I create a new weekly snapshot for download at 00:00CDT on
Sundays. Users are welcome to download these snapshots from
ftp:/
ACK,
It's not you, that's duplicate code.
Eric
On Feb 28, 2010, at 09:05:46, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> tun.c contains this code, in the
>
> #elif defined(TARGET_FREEBSD)||defined(TARGET_DRAGONFLY)
>
> part of do_ifconfig() (about line 983 in the IPv6 payload branch):
>
> -
With some help from the former port maintainer, I've undeleted
security/openvpn-devel in the FreeBSD ports tree and have updated it with a git
pull from last week. My goal is to keep a recent snapshot within the FreeBSD
ports tree, on a weekly or biweekly basis.
Ideally, the version that makes
On Feb 19, 2010, at 08:56:23, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 03:29:48PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
>> I'm fine with whichever path you choose. But just bear in mind, some
>> systems might not have IPv6 support - which breaks portability ...
>
> On the unixish side, t
How is -devel being numbered, and how are we handling snapshots for propagation
of -devel versions? I've spoken with Matthias Andree, the FreeBSD port
maintainer, and he'll be handing maintainership to me for openvpn-devel
(possibly openvpn, later) after the ports freeze.
Should I be taking
ACK.
On Feb 18, 2010, at 11:58:28, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> ---
> sample-scripts/verify-cn | 42 +++---
> 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sample-scripts/verify-cn b/sample-scripts/verify-cn
> index 5d56d95..f9fea0f 100755
> -
There is not, yet, aside from the -devel mailing list. There is one in the
works in short order, however.
Eric
On Feb 1, 2010, at 13:45:34, Jason Haar wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I think I've found bugs in openvpn (nobind doesn't work with UDP) and
> the openvpnserv.exe for Windows (sometimes doesn
On Jan 31, 2010, at 21:35:01, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 01/31/2010 11:13:06 AM, Eric F Crist wrote:
>> I do not feel the forums and mailing list need to be synchronized.
>> They are two different mediums, and should be treated as such.
>
> I disagree. (Although this
On Jan 31, 2010, at 11:13:06, Eric F Crist wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2010, at 09:39:07, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
>> Well,
>> I can probably speak on my behalf...
>> I won't use forums, so no help from me if traffic is diverted into forums.
>>
>> Alon.
>
On Jan 31, 2010, at 09:39:07, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Well,
> I can probably speak on my behalf...
> I won't use forums, so no help from me if traffic is diverted into forums.
>
> Alon.
Understandable, but I don't recall anyone basing the forums solely on your
support. There is no reason 'not' t
On Jan 31, 2010, at 06:59:10, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
[ snip ]
> You are better use separate products for each category.
[ snip ]
> 5. Forums... Why not mailing list with archive? As it always had been?
> And use mailman?
In regards to forums, not everyone wants to use a single source of informati
On Jan 20, 2010, at 04:39:18, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I dug a little deeper into Trac and to Redmine, which was another
> candidate for the (developer) site. I took a look at Git support which
> we need (if we need to start using Git later on). Trac has had some
> _serious_ performan
Logs for this conversation have been placed at
http://secure-computing.net/logs/openvpn-20090112.log.
Eric
On Jan 13, 2010, at 06:30:30, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here's a summary of the development model meeting we had yesterday. Let
> me know if you have any comments.
>
> --
> S
On Jan 6, 2010, at 12:08:01, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> 2010/1/6, Eric F Crist :
>>
>> This forum will be moderated. To apply for +v during the conversation,
>> please send an email to open...@secure-computing.net with your registered
>> IRC nickname a
On Jan 6, 2010, at 11:33:41, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> On 01/06/2010 09:14:01 AM, Eric F Crist wrote:
>
>> This forum will be moderated. To apply for +v during the
>> conversation, please send an email to open...@secure-computing.net
>> with your registered IRC nickname and
On Jan 6, 2010, at 07:11:16, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I discussed our current development with James and he agreed we need to
> change it. Therefore I'm organizing an open IRC meeting where we'll discuss
> what changes to make and how. James will of course be attending:
>
> Place:
On Jan 6, 2010, at 07:14:06, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> Sorry for spamming, but I forgot to mention where the meeting is held
> :). So here's full meeting information:
>
> Place: #openvpn at irc.freenode.net
> Time: Monday 11th Jan 19:00 UTC (20:00 MET, 21:00 EEST, 11AM PST, 2PM EST)
> Duration: 1
26 matches
Mail list logo
