James Yonan wrote:
>
> I'm happy to announce the release of OpenVPN 2.1.0. This release is
> basically 2.1_rc22 + some last-minute trivial fixes to
> documentation and plugin sample code. Enjoy!
Does this mean patches are now accepted?
In other words: What is next? What is the plan?
Regards
Hi!
As this discussion has not much to do with the rc19 release, would
you please change the subject ?
Like "OpenVPN and SELinux" or "Securing the OpenVPN process" ...
Thanks,
David
> -Original Message-
> From: Karl O. Pinc [mailto:k...@meme.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 6:17
James Yonan wrote:
> Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 February 2009 13:35:35 David Balazic wrote:
> >> Ping ?
> >>
> >> Should I resend the patch without the end-of-line-spaces change ?
> >
> > James has his own response times.
> >
Ping ?
Should I resend the patch without the end-of-line-spaces change ?
Regards,
David
> -Original Message-
> From: Alon Bar-Lev [mailto:alon.bar...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 7:17 PM
> To: David Balazic
> Cc: James Yonan; openvpn-devel@lists.
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Subject: Fix for "Cannot read current default gateway" problem on Linux
> On Monday 02 February 2009 11:49:50 David Balazic wrote:
> > diff -u openvpn_trunk/route.c openvpn_patched/route.c
> > --- openvpn_trunk/route.c 2009-01-29
James Yonan wrote:
> David,
>
> A couple issues with the patch:
>
> * sscanf usage doesn't check for buffer overflow.
See below.
> * You use gw_if_name in some places and gw_ifname in other
> places. To
> eliminate confusion it would be best to use a consistent form.
Done.
> Also, to rei
diff -u openvpn_trunk/route.c openvpn_patched/route.c
--- openvpn_trunk/route.c 2009-01-29 15:00:04.525034400 +0100
+++ openvpn_patched/route.c 2009-01-29 15:03:41.116012000 +0100
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
static void add_route (struct route *r, const struct tuntap *tt, unsigned int
flags, co
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Some minor comments.
> 1. Please rebase against trunk.
Done.
> > - gateway);
> > + netmask);
> > + if (r->gateway)
> > +argv_printf_cat (&argv, "gw %s", gateway);
> > + else
> > +argv_printf_cat (&argv, "dev %s", r->gateway_ifname);
Hi!
I'm resending this patch. Originally I sent it here [1].
In short:
In the diff (agains 2.1_rc15) is the solution for the old*
problem of (not) detecting default gateway on linux systems
if it is a device route.
It was tested by one affected user (Antonis Tsolomitis, see the
thread "openvpn a
Hi!
I sent a patch recently to the openvpn-devel list and got
no reply whatsoever. Did I miss something ? Is there a procedure
that I did not follow ?
That patch is to fix a longstanding bug that users encountered.
Regards,
David
PS: the mail message in question is :
Fix for "Cannot read curren
Did you try to run OpenVPN setup in compatibility mode ?
Set compatibility to Vista or XP.
Regards,
David
From: István Szukács [mailto:lecc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2009 7:43 AM
To: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.user/23972>
"openvpn and ppp"
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.user/25117>
> -Original Message-
> From: Antonis Tsolomitis [mailto:at...@aegean.gr]
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 8:37 P
What difficulties ?
(slashes work just fine on Windows)
Regards,
David
From: openvpn-devel-boun...@lists.sourceforge.net on behalf of Noam Rathaus
Sent: sre 02-maj-07 12:54
To: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Openvpn-devel] OpenVPN server in a mixe
Hi!
I got bit by this bug again. Should I try the 2.1 beta ?
Are there any newer build than the OpenVPN 2.1_beta7 on openvpn.se ?
Regards,
David
PS: Is http://openvpn.net/ down ?
From: openvpn-devel-boun...@lists.sourceforge.net on behalf of David Balazic
Hi!
After a network failure, OpenVPN client reconnects to the server, but fails to
set up the default route.
An USR1 signal then makes it reconnect properly (not visible in the logs below).
Note that the server IP is resolved just fine (how else could it then connect?)
Regards,
David
server
15 matches
Mail list logo