Am Saturday 04 June 2005 12:28 schrieb Pawel Pokrywka:
> Hello,
> Google organizes contest, see:
>
> http://code.google.com/summerofcode.html
> In particular, there is one missing feature - and no one is intereseted
> in doing it - Windows 9x/ME support in TAP-win32. Programming for old
> Windows
Am Samstag, den 30.04.2005, 13:27 -0600 schrieb James Yonan:
> Take a look at the "setenv" directive. The setenv list is passed to
> plugins.
Hmmm, I must have overseen this. What a luck that I haven't flamed RTFM
on the list yet :-)
Maybe I've also overseen the new wiki. Did you have time to
Am Samstag, den 30.04.2005, 13:33 -0600 schrieb James Yonan:
> I agree that this method is not perfect, but it has the two important
> properties that:
>
> (1) it lets OpenVPN handle script or plugin calls the same
> (2) it works on all OSes, including Windows
>
> And remember that you can also
Am Samstag, den 30.04.2005, 01:42 -0600 schrieb James Yonan:
[snip]
> No, you have to write configuration file directives (containing the
> appropriate ifconfig-push directive) to the temporary file provided by the
> caller. This is so that we can maintain an identical interface for both
> script
Am Samstag, den 30.04.2005, 01:42 -0600 schrieb James Yonan:
> Right now, you can only get it by reading the --status file. For 2.1 I'm
> considering to add another script/callback for passing current accounting
> data.
>
> One of the goals of the plugin interface is to allow a fully-featured
>
Am Samstag, den 22.01.2005, 17:39 +0100 schrieb Paolo Poletti:
> i'm pretty curious ... why not Webmin ?
Because I dislike the architecture of it. I think I couldn't sleep well
if some perl application is managing critical services :-)
Furthermore, I don't like perl (sorry beloved perl-monks). It
Am Samstag, den 22.01.2005, 16:02 +0100 schrieb Paolo Poletti:
> Hi, we're planning the development of a Webmin module for openvpn, that
> will be released with GPL license : is there any started project that we
> can contribute to ?
>
Not as far as I know. I've done some research in the web an
Am Montag 25 Oktober 2004 01:29 schrieb James Yonan:
>
> Yes, this is already merged in beta14.
>
> James
>
Hi,
is it possible, that cryptoapi.c and cryptoapi.h are missing in the 2.0 beta14
source packages?
Though, in the cvs branch of beta14 these files are present.
Maybe anyone could fix this
