Trac #637
---
src/openvpn/route.c | 8
src/openvpn/tun.c | 6 +-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/openvpn/route.c b/src/openvpn/route.c
index 1775a9c..cf5a067 100644
--- a/src/openvpn/route.c
+++ b/src/openvpn/route.c
@@ -1623,6 +1623,10 @@ add_rout
Trac #637
Signed-off-by: Lev Stipakov
---
src/openvpn/route.c | 16
src/openvpn/tun.c | 6 +-
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/openvpn/route.c b/src/openvpn/route.c
index 4a60345..2012b5c 100644
--- a/src/openvpn/route.c
+++ b/src/openvp
Trac #637
Signed-off-by: Lev Stipakov
---
src/openvpn/route.c | 16
src/openvpn/tun.c | 2 ++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/openvpn/route.c b/src/openvpn/route.c
index 4a60345..2012b5c 100644
--- a/src/openvpn/route.c
+++ b/src/openvpn/ro
Thanks, I think (I think!) I got it now.
1) Since we have tt->adapter_index (which temporarily disappeared from
my perception of reality), no need to add new member to tuntap or
tuntap_options.
2) tt->adapter_index has nothing to do with rgi->adapter_index, first
one is windows adapter index
- Original Message -
From: "Gert Doering"
To:
Cc: "Gert Doering" ;
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] Opttion "client-nat" not recognised
the code says "four arguments
have to be there" and the git master code says "four arguments have
to be ther
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 08:06:45PM -, debbie...@gmail.com wrote:
> > According to the (slightly confusing, admittedly) man page entry,
> > the way you are calling the option is not correct, and as such,
> > git master will refuse the lines. "client-nat" has *four* arguments,
> > not *fi
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 09:41:56PM +0200, Lev Stipakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> So, if we want to use index also for "add/del route", I'd gently modify
> >> add/del_route_ipv6 and make it use "interface=" (without breaking
> >> "vpn server special route" case).
> >
> > For consistency, I think we
- Original Message -
From: "Gert Doering"
To:
Cc:
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] Opttion "client-nat" not recognised
According to the (slightly confusing, admittedly) man page entry,
the way you are calling the option is not correct, and as suc
Hi,
So, if we want to use index also for "add/del route", I'd gently modify
add/del_route_ipv6 and make it use "interface=" (without breaking
"vpn server special route" case).
For consistency, I think we should do that. What I'd avoid is to do
the adapter_index lookup for every single route -
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 07:35:18PM -, debbie...@gmail.com wrote:
> today, I was working with an old config which uses --client-nat
> I upgraded that particular client to git-master for testing and
> discovered that git-master currently does not support --client-nat
[..]
> Fri Dec 11 19:08:
Hi,
today, I was working with an old config which uses --client-nat
I upgraded that particular client to git-master for testing and
discovered that git-master currently does not support --client-nat
This config works perfectly with older versions,
details follow:
GIT-master versions which --cli
On 10.12.2015 18:49, ValdikSS wrote:
I'd better go with just
closing the engine without deleting everything. I don't see any
drawbacks, that should be perfectly OK for a dynamic session.
Is this correct, Lev? If yes, I'll push v9 today or tomorrow morning.
Removing non-working FwpmSubLayerDel
Based on release/2.3 branch and ValdikSS's v9 patch, this patch is
cross-compiled on Linux and tested on Windows XP/10. The VC project file is
left untouched - you might want to add rpcrt4.lib to compile and link it under
MSVC.
Take ValdikSS's patch for "block-outside-dns" option and
make it Windo
Hi,
The patch is mangled by mailer (added linebreaks etc.). Could you please
resend using git send-email? While at it, one thing I noticed:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Fish Wang wrote:
> -#if _WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0600
>else if (streq (p[0], "block-outside-dns") && !p[1])
> {
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
