> When reviewing the patch "FQDN for routes should expand to all IPs"
> today, I spotted that there is a function called getaddr() (renamed to
> getaddr_all() in the mentioned patch). This function again makes use of
> the old gethostbyname() function. This is not compatible with IPv6
> addresses
> Thanks a lot for you patch! In general, it very looks good. Can you
> elaborate a little bit on how you have tested this patch?
I've been using it on my client machines for the last few months.
This is not a very extensive test, obviously: they're all configured
identically and so they all loo
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:47 PM, David Sommerseth
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all!
>
> When reviewing the patch "FQDN for routes should expand to all IPs"
> today, I spotted that there is a function called getaddr() (renamed to
> getaddr_all() in the mentioned p
Hi David,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:49 PM, David Sommerseth
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Greetings all!
>
> I am now announcing the openvpn-testing.git tree as open. Gert has
> already been announcing the availability as a response to some merge
> conflicts. An
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16/02/10 19:49, David Sommerseth wrote:
>
> Greetings all!
>
[...snip...]
>
> What's next:
>
[...snip...]
>
> - Update the developers documentation on the wiki, with some
> "requirements" to get patches included. For already submitted patches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/02/10 17:20, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 02:47:28PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
>> When reviewing the patch "FQDN for routes should expand to all IPs"
>> today, I spotted that there is a function called getaddr() (re
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 02:47:28PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote:
> When reviewing the patch "FQDN for routes should expand to all IPs"
> today, I spotted that there is a function called getaddr() (renamed to
> getaddr_all() in the mentioned patch). This function again makes use of
> the old
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/02/10 06:17, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> [ I've sent this in the past already, but just trying to make sure it
> doesn't get lost somewhere. ]
>
> When specifiying an FQDN for the network part of a route, OpenVPN should
> setup a route for each IP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all!
When reviewing the patch "FQDN for routes should expand to all IPs"
today, I spotted that there is a function called getaddr() (renamed to
getaddr_all() in the mentioned patch). This function again makes use of
the old gethostbyname() functio
We could discuss this crypto issue with James in the IRC meeting
tomorrow. He should also be able to provide useful feedback about the
patches in general.
Samuli
> Someone with a better understanding of the crypto stuff should verify
> that the ctx->current_cert->sha1_hash is always valid, and po
[ I've sent this in the past already, but just trying to make sure it
doesn't get lost somewhere. ]
When specifiying an FQDN for the network part of a route, OpenVPN should
setup a route for each IP associated with that FQDN. Currently, it just
chooses one of the IPs at random instead, which le
11 matches
Mail list logo
