"Sean M. Collins" wrote on 08/04/2015 10:38:26 PM:
> We have adapted the contents of that wiki page into the networking
> guide, however I have not seen any work in the Juno release for IPv6
> only networking.
>
> Brian Haley and I had a talk submission for Tokyo about work that
> has been do
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 03:26:24AM EDT, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> "Sean M. Collins" wrote on 08/04/2015 10:38:26 PM:
>
> > We have adapted the contents of that wiki page into the networking
> > guide, however I have not seen any work in the Juno release for IPv6
> > only networking.
> >
> > Bria
Hello! Our next OpenStack App Catalog meeting will take place this
Thursday August 6th at 17:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3
The agenda can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/app-catalog
Please add agenda items if there's anything specific you would like to discuss.
Please jo
How do you delegate the ability to delegate?
Lets say you are running a large cloud (purely hypothetical here) and
you want to let a user manage their own project. They are "admin" but
they should be able to invite or eject people.
In order to do this, an ordinary user needs to be able to ma
Adam.
The second issue is a big one. I think a lot of operators ( especially
newer operators ) are not aware of how much cruft builds up in the database
over time from left over security policies as tenants are created and
removed. It causes issues. I've had to work on software to manually cle
As an Op, I've ran into this problem and keep running into it. I would very
much like a solution.
Its also quite related to the nova instance user issue I've been working on,
that's needed by the App Catalog project.
So, yes, please keep fighting the good fight.
Thanks,
Kevin
_
We ran into this as well.
What we did is create an external to keystone api, that we expose to our
end users via a UI. The api will let user create projects (with a
specific defined quota) and also add users with the "project admins" role
to the project. Those admins can add/remove users from t
On 08/05/2015 12:01 PM, Kris G. Lindgren wrote:
We ran into this as well.
What we did is create an external to keystone api, that we expose to our
end users via a UI. The api will let user create projects (with a
specific defined quota) and also add users with the "project admins" role
to the
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Kris G. Lindgren wrote:
> We ran into this as well.
>
> What we did is create an external to keystone api, that we expose to our
> end users via a UI. The api will let user create projects (with a
> specific defined quota) and also add users with the "project admi
See inline.
Kris Lindgren
Senior Linux Systems Engineer
GoDaddy, LLC.
On 8/5/15, 11:19 AM, "Adam Young" wrote:
>On 08/05/2015 12:01 PM, Kris G. Lindgren wrote:
>> We ran into this as well.
>>
>> What we did is create an external to keystone api, t
FYI, a few suggestions on tuning CPU bound workloads with KVM at
http://openstack-in-production.blogspot.fr/2015/08/kvm-and-hyper-v-comparison-for-high.html.
The Kilo enhancements looks to be a great help.
Tim
___
OpenStack-operators mailing list
Ope
I’d like to see some time spent on specific issues associated with public cloud
operations. (This is not the same as Large Deployments.) As Stefano pointed
out yesterday:
http://maffulli.net/2015/08/04/a-new-push-for-openstack-public-clouds/
this is an area which probably needs more at
They are workload specific so it is more a suggestion of where to look at
optimising rather than a unique HTC profile for any application. So, try them
out with your workload and choose which ones make sense.
We'll be working with upstream so that the cloud consumer can choose the right
opti
Definitely worth the read.
On August 5, 2015 3:22:33 PM EDT, Tim Bell wrote:
>
>They are workload specific so it is more a suggestion of where to look
>at optimising rather than a unique HTC profile for any application.
>So, try them out with your workload and choose which ones make sense.
>
>W
I suspect that if we audited all OpenStack deployments we’d find that an awful
lot of them have built something similar. (In our case we re-used the Cisco
Prime Service Catalog system, but that was just a matter of convenience.) It
would be nice if we could minimize the need for this, but many o
Operators:
We (myself, Paul and Doug) are looking to better understand who might be
using Neutron's VPNaaS code. We're looking for what version you're using,
how long you're using it, and if you plan to continue deploying it with
future upgrades. Any information operators can provide here would be
I attempted to run it in Juno a while back and had very little
success. I would love to be able to use it though, and will give it
another shot once upgraded to Kilo. My issue was that several of the
options coded into it for firing up a connection were specific to
Freeswan which was deprecated, at
Echoing what others have said, we too have an abstraction layer in the
form of a custom UI to allow project "owners" to create/delete users.
As for your questions Adam, having policy in the Keystone database as
data seems like a no brainer. As you suggest it enables us to do so much
more.
For pro
rovide here would be
fantastic!
Thank you!
Kyle
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/attachments/20150805/e38465b2/attachment.html
>
___
OpenSt
On 06/08/15 04:01, Kris G. Lindgren wrote:
> We ran into this as well.
>
> What we did is create an external to keystone api, that we expose to our
> end users via a UI. The api will let user create projects (with a
> specific defined quota) and also add users with the "project admins" role
> to
I'm reaching out to the community here in hopes there's someone with deep
understanding of (and preferably support experience with) Ceph reading
this. If that's you, can you please email me offline ASAP? I want to talk
to you (whoever you may be) for a quick/lucrative remote consulting
opportunity.
Jumping in with another "us too" here. We have some custom Horizon
extensions that allow project owners to manage some of this stuff.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Marc Heckmann
wrote:
> Echoing what others have said, we too have an abstraction layer in the
> form of a custom UI to allow proje
Thanks Geoff.
Which session would you propose to replace?
Regards,
Tom
On 06/08/15 03:14, Geoff Arnold wrote:
I’d like to see some time spent on specific issues associated with
public cloud operations. (This is not the same as Large Deployments.)
As Stefano pointed out yesterday:
http://m
I know I can’t wear both hats but in this case as Operator as one of the
constant moderators for the neutron-related sessions, I can say that I have
never received a report about the VPNaaS code from the Operators. This could be
means two things, the code is terrific and nobody has issues with i
24 matches
Mail list logo
