I’d like to see some time spent on specific issues associated with public cloud
operations. (This is not the same as Large Deployments.) As Stefano pointed
out yesterday:
http://maffulli.net/2015/08/04/a-new-push-for-openstack-public-clouds/
this is an area which probably needs more attention.
Cheers,
Geoff
> On Aug 4, 2015, at 11:11 PM, Tom Fifield <t...@openstack.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've received feedback that maybe there won't be enough HPC folks in Palo
> Alto to run a 90 minute working session on it :)
>
> I would propose to slot in instead one of these three, which are currently
> not well included on the agenda:
>
> 1) apps.openstack.org <http://apps.openstack.org/> - What the Ops Community
> would like from it, should we look from the Application side, ie Applications
> that can run on your cloud, or Augment your cloud, Products that can help
> enhance your cloud.
>
> 2) Openstack Personas (validation) - The UX team will have a set of roles
> that we would like to validate with the opertator community.
>
> 3) Task Taxonomy - The UX team is creating an inventory of "standardized"
> tasks that can be used to create scenarios and create a common vernacular
> within the community.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Tom
>
> On 03/08/15 18:48, Tom Fifield wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Registrations are going well for our meetup in Palo Alto. If you're on the
>> fence, hopefully this discussion will get you quickly over the line so you
>> don't miss out!
>>
>> http://www.eventbrite.com/e/openstack-ops-mid-cycle-meetup-tickets-17703258924
>>
>> <http://www.eventbrite.com/e/openstack-ops-mid-cycle-meetup-tickets-17703258924>
>>
>> So, I've taken our suggestions and attempted to wrangle them into something
>> that would fit in the space we have over 2 days.
>>
>> As a reminder, we have two different kind of sessions - General Sessions,
>> which are discussions for the operator community aimed to produce actions
>> (eg best practices, feedback on badness), and Working groups focus on
>> specific topics aiming to make concrete progress on tasks in that area.
>>
>> As always, some stuff has been munged and mangled in an attempt to fit it
>> in. For example, we'd expect to talk about Kolla more generally in the
>> context of "Using Containers for Deployment", because there are some other
>> ways to do that too. Similarly, we'd expect the "ops project" discussion to
>> be rolled into the session on the user committee.
>>
>> Anyway, take a look at the below and reply with your comments! Is anything
>> missing? Something look like a terrible idea? Want to completely change the
>> room layout? There's still a little bit of flexibility at this stage.
>>
>>
>>
>> Tuesday Med II Med III Salon A Salon B Bacchus
>> 9:00 - 10:00 Registration
>>
>>
>>
>> 10:00 - 10:30 Introduction
>>
>>
>>
>> 10:30 - 11:15 Burning Issues
>>
>>
>>
>> 11:15 - 11:55 Hypervisor Tuning
>>
>>
>>
>> 11:55 - 12:05 Breakout Explain
>>
>>
>>
>> 12:05 - 13:30 Lunch
>>
>>
>>
>> 13:30 - 15:00 Large Deployments Team Burning Issues Logging WG
>> Upgrades WG Ops Guide Fixing
>> 15:00 - 15:30 Coffee
>>
>>
>>
>> 15:30 - 16:00 Breakout Reports
>>
>>
>>
>> 16:00 - 17:00 Using Containers for Deployment
>>
>>
>>
>> 17:00 - 18:00 Lightening Talks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Wednesday Med II Med III Salon A Salon B Bacchus
>> 9:00 - 09:45 CMDB: use cases
>>
>>
>>
>> 9:45 - 10:30 Deployment Tips - read only slaves? admin-only API servers?
>>
>>
>>
>> 10:30 - 11:15 What network model are you using? Are you happy?
>>
>>
>>
>> 11:15 - 11:30 Coffee
>>
>>
>>
>> 11:30 - 12:15 User Committee Discussion
>>
>>
>>
>> 12:15 - 12:20 Breakout Explain
>>
>>
>>
>> 12:20 - 13:30 Lunch
>>
>>
>>
>> 13:30 - 15:00 Tools and Monitoring Product WG Packaging
>> HPC Working Group Ops Tags Team
>> 15:00 - 15:30 Coffee
>>
>>
>>
>> 15:30 - 16:00 Breakout Reports
>>
>>
>>
>> 16:00 - 17:00 Feedback Session, Tokyo Planning
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> There will be a followup email shortly regarding moderators for the sessions
>> - thanks to those who volunteered so far!
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-operators mailing list
>> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
>> <mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
>> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-operators mailing list
> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
> <mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
> <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators>
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
