...@yuggoth.org;
openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] thierry's longer dev cycle proposal
It is a sign of the maturity of OpenStack. With lots of deployment and most of
them in production, the emphasis is shifting from rapid functionality additions
to stab
]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 5:29 PM
To: Jeremy Stanley ; openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] thierry's longer dev cycle proposal
I think this is a good opportunity to allow some stress relief to the developer
community and offer space for
I think this is a good opportunity to allow some stress relief to the developer
community and offer space for more discussions with operators where some
operators do not feel like they are bothering/bugging developers. I believe
this is the main gain for operators; my personal opinion. In genera
On 2017-12-13 22:35:41 +0100 (+0100), Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
> It's not really fait accompli, it's just a proposal up for discussion at
> this stage. Which is the reason why I started the thread on -dev -- to
> check the sanity of the change from a dev perspective first. If it makes
> things h
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> David Medberry wrote:
> While it may have desirable side-effects on the ops side (something I'm
> not convinced of), the main reason for it is imho to align our rhythm
> with our current development pace / developer capabilities. I felt lik
David Medberry wrote:
> Just saw some of your comments (great, thanks), and I'll weigh in if I
> come up with a cogent input.
>
> I'd really like to see Bloomberg, RAX, and Cirrus7, Huawei, and other
> ops folks respond.
>
> I suspect this is already a fait accompli but there are many details (as
Since Bloomberg was mentioned, I agree with Thierry's rationale quite a
bit. I need to read it more carefully but initial response, gut feel, very
positive.
When I can I'll a) read carefully b) respond on -dev
Chris
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:00 PM, David Medberry
wrote:
> Just saw some of your
Just saw some of your comments (great, thanks), and I'll weigh in if I come
up with a cogent input.
I'd really like to see Bloomberg, RAX, and Cirrus7, Huawei, and other ops
folks respond.
I suspect this is already a fait accompli but there are many details (as
you mentioned already in one postin
Would be great to get ops-side input. I didn't want to cross-post because I'm
sure this is going to be a big thread and go on for a while. But I would
encourage anyone with input to jump in on that thread. We could also discuss it
separately here and I can try to answer questions or feed that input
