David Medberry wrote: > Just saw some of your comments (great, thanks), and I'll weigh in if I > come up with a cogent input. > > I'd really like to see Bloomberg, RAX, and Cirrus7, Huawei, and other > ops folks respond. > > I suspect this is already a fait accompli but there are many details (as > you mentioned already in one posting about mid-cycles) to work out.
It's not really fait accompli, it's just a proposal up for discussion at this stage. Which is the reason why I started the thread on -dev -- to check the sanity of the change from a dev perspective first. If it makes things harder and not simpler on that side, I don't expect the TC to proceed. While it may have desirable side-effects on the ops side (something I'm not convinced of), the main reason for it is imho to align our rhythm with our current development pace / developer capabilities. I felt like we were self-imposing too many deadlines, events and coordination processes for limited gain. Maybe I'm wrong though :) -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
