Re: [Openstack-operators] YAML config

2016-02-01 Thread Alexis Lee
Alexis Lee said on Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 04:54:39PM +: > I have a spec up to allow config files to be specified as YAML instead > of INI: https://review.openstack.org/273468 Sorry to do this so soon after first posting but - I've let this die. Initial feedback has been very negative and it seem

Re: [Openstack-operators] YAML config

2016-02-01 Thread John Dewey
IMO config files should generally be managed as a template. If the files were YAML, I would still be managing them as a template. I went down the path of managing ini files with Ansible’s ini_file module, and it’s just not worth it. John On February 1, 2016 at 8:59:10 AM, Alexis Lee (lx...@hpe.c

Re: [Openstack-operators] YAML config

2016-02-01 Thread Abel Lopez
I agree that having options in how you specify your configuration would be nice. I see that your change is to add yaml support, not replace INI, so that's a plus. Specifically with regards to ansible, you're correct that the ini_file module is sub-optimal, we've recently changed our playbooks awa