On 08/13/2015 03:08 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We're still lacking moderators for the following sessions - any takers?
>
> 1. Hypervisor Tuning - General Session (have a backup, but would like a
> primary)
> 2. Burning Issues WG (already have one for the general session)
> 3. Upgrades
Hi Tom,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We're still lacking moderators for the following sessions - any takers?
>
> 1. Hypervisor Tuning - General Session (have a backup, but would like a
> primary)
>
I'm happy to be the primary on this -- not a problem at all
Hi all,
We're still lacking moderators for the following sessions - any takers?
1. Hypervisor Tuning - General Session (have a backup, but would like a
primary)
2. Burning Issues WG (already have one for the general session)
3. Upgrades WG
4. Packaging WG
Regards,
Tom
On 10/08/15 22:35, T
Thanks to Geoff and all,
Here's the schedule diff:
Large Deployments Team --> Large Deployments Team (inc Public Cloud)
HPC WG --> ??? (any takers?)
Current status is: working with those who volunteered to moderate and
getting someone to take care of every slot.
Also, don't forget the carp
Well, I’d prefer not to put Public Clouds into the existing HPC slot, because
I’m involved in the Product WG discussion that’s scheduled at the same time.
Could we put Public Clouds in the Tuesday breakout mix, and Large Deployments
in the Wednesday breakout (replacing the HPC WG).
Geoff
PS Wi
Thanks Geoff.
Which session would you propose to replace?
Regards,
Tom
On 06/08/15 03:14, Geoff Arnold wrote:
I’d like to see some time spent on specific issues associated with
public cloud operations. (This is not the same as Large Deployments.)
As Stefano pointed out yesterday:
http://m
I’d like to see some time spent on specific issues associated with public cloud
operations. (This is not the same as Large Deployments.) As Stefano pointed
out yesterday:
http://maffulli.net/2015/08/04/a-new-push-for-openstack-public-clouds/
this is an area which probably needs more at
Hi all,
I've received feedback that maybe there won't be enough HPC folks in
Palo Alto to run a 90 minute working session on it :)
I would propose to slot in instead one of these three, which are
currently not well included on the agenda:
1) apps.openstack.org - What the Ops Community would
On 04/08/15 00:00, David Medberry wrote:
I think planning for people to leave early is a very poor idea. Planning
to make sure things that need to get done first is fine though.
Let's not think of the second day as a partial day.
+1, we already do finish a little early on the second day to faci
On 04/08/15 00:28, gustavo panizzo wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:22:26PM -0400, Ju Lim wrote:
Any chance that the Ops meetup will have some ability for folks to
teleconference in?
Thoughts?
+1 please
just record it and upload it somewhere would be useful, I'm not sure if
it will work
On 04/08/15 13:10, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On another note: is anybody interested in sharing a ride from San
Francisco? One less car on the road, the environment(alists) will thank
us :)
An excellent idea!
Last time in San Antonio, an etherpad worked reasonably well for car
pool, so here's
On 08/03/2015 09:22 AM, Ju Lim wrote:
> Any chance that the Ops meetup will have some ability for folks to
> teleconference in?
Given that the conference will be at a hotel, experience tells me that
we'll be lucky if there is enough bandwidth for all participants. OTOH,
Tom has surprised us before
Looks great, Tom, thanks. Coupling breakouts with lunch is a good plan.
From: Tom Fifield
Date: Monday, August 3, 2015 at 4:48 AM
To: OpenStack Operators
Subject: [Openstack-operators] Draft Agenda for PAO Ops Meetup (August 18, 19)
Hi all,
Registrations are going well for our meetup in Palo
On 8/3/15 11:00 AM, David Medberry wrote:
> I think planning for people to leave early is a very poor idea.
> Planning to make sure things that need to get done first is fine though.
> Let's not think of the second day as a partial day.
Oh i get this. But the harsh reality is that, that's what happ
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:22:26PM -0400, Ju Lim wrote:
> Any chance that the Ops meetup will have some ability for folks to
> teleconference in?
>
> Thoughts?
>
+1 please
just record it and upload it somewhere would be useful, I'm not sure if
it will work for ambient talk but I think is worth t
Any chance that the Ops meetup will have some ability for folks to
teleconference in?
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Ju Lim
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:09 PM, David Medberry
wrote:
> Lightening is when you make something lighter. Lightning talks are meant
> to be about fast lightning speed talks so s/Li
Lightening is when you make something lighter. Lightning talks are meant to
be about fast lightning speed talks so s/Lightening/Lightning/g
I've added a bit more detail under Upgrades and would happily moderate that
bit (as likely would any TWC-er.)
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:48 AM, Tom Fifield
I think planning for people to leave early is a very poor idea. Planning to
make sure things that need to get done first is fine though.
Let's not think of the second day as a partial day.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:49 AM, JJ Asghar wrote:
> On 8/3/15 5:48 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
On 8/3/15 5:48 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Registrations are going well for our meetup in Palo Alto. If you're on
> the fence, hopefully this discussion will get you quickly over the
> line so you don't miss out!
>
> http://www.eventbrite.com/e/openstack-ops-mid-cycle-meetup-tickets-1770
Hi all,
Registrations are going well for our meetup in Palo Alto. If you're on
the fence, hopefully this discussion will get you quickly over the line
so you don't miss out!
http://www.eventbrite.com/e/openstack-ops-mid-cycle-meetup-tickets-17703258924
So, I've taken our suggestions and atte
20 matches
Mail list logo
