Hello, Matt,
See inline comments with [joehuang]
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)
From: Matt Riedemann [mriede...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 June 2017 10:09
To: openstack-...@lists.openstack.org; openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstac
Hi Matt,
Just looking into this,
> On 1 Jun 2017, at 9:08 am, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>
> This is a request for any operators out there that configure nova to set:
>
> [cinder]
> cross_az_attach=False
>
> To check out these two bug fixes:
>
> 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/366724/
>
> Th
On 5/28/2017 6:58 PM, joehuang wrote:
Hello,
There is one session in OpenStack Boston summit about Neutron
multi-site, and discuss how to make Neutron cells-aware[1].
We have done experiment how Nova cells v2 + Neutron + Tricircle can work
very well:
Thanks for testing this out Joe. It's g
On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 17:01 -0400, Erik McCormick wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Lance Bragstad
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Marc Heckmann > t.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 10:09 -0500, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> > >
> > > Al
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Marc Heckmann
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 10:09 -0500, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>>
>> Also, with all the people involved with this thread, I'm curious what the
>> best way is to get consens
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Marc Heckmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 10:09 -0500, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>
> Also, with all the people involved with this thread, I'm curious what the
> best way is to get consensus. If I've tallied the responses properly, we
> have 5 in favor of opt
Hi,
On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 10:09 -0500, Lance Bragstad wrote:
Also, with all the people involved with this thread, I'm curious what the best
way is to get consensus. If I've tallied the responses properly, we have 5 in
favor of option #2 and 1 in favor of option #3. This week is spec freeze for
I’ll try to join but just in case ….
The CERN CephFS experience is at
https://www.openstack.org/videos/boston-2017/manila-on-cephfs-at-cern-the-short-way-to-production.
Happy with the solution as a POSIX compliant shared file system. Only slight
concern is that the kernel client does not have
Hello all -
We have an IRC meeting coming up on Wednesday at 0900 UTC in channel
#openstack-meeting.
This week's agenda includes a number of events taking place over the summer,
curating an archive of research papers relating to OpenStack, and sharing
experiences and best practice on using Ce
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Emilien Macchi's message of 2017-06-06 18:08:36 +0200:
>> Following-up the session that we had in Boston:
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-forum-future-of-configuration-management
>>
>> Here's an update on where we are and
Excerpts from Emilien Macchi's message of 2017-06-06 18:08:36 +0200:
> Following-up the session that we had in Boston:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-forum-future-of-configuration-management
>
> Here's an update on where we are and what is being done.
>
>
> == Machine Readable Sample Con
Dear all,
A gentle reminder for our meeting tomorrow.
As usual, the agenda is available at:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/massively_distributed_ircmeetings_2017 (line
675)
Please feel free to add items.
Best,
ad_rien_
___
OpenStack-operators ma
Following-up the session that we had in Boston:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-forum-future-of-configuration-management
Here's an update on where we are and what is being done.
== Machine Readable Sample Config
Ben's spec has been merged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/440835/
And also
A quick reminder that the deadline for submissions to the KVM Forum
2017 is just 10 days away now, June 15.
On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 01:50:52PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> KVM Forum 2017: Call For Participation
> October 25-2
Also, with all the people involved with this thread, I'm curious what the
best way is to get consensus. If I've tallied the responses properly, we
have 5 in favor of option #2 and 1 in favor of option #3. This week is spec
freeze for keystone, so I see a slim chance of this getting committed to
Pik
I replied to John, but directly. I'm sending the responses I sent to him
but with the intended audience on the thread. Sorry for not catching that
earlier.
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 2:44 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
> +1 on not forcing Operators to transition to something new twice, even if
> we did g
We had a productive meeting today. Mexico City planning is progressing and
we should shortly be able to seek sponsors for line items such as catering
and signage.
APAC 2018 planning is picking up. There seems to be good interest in that.
Minutes :
Meeting ended Tue Jun 6 14:52:39 2017 UTC. Infor
If you'll be in Saint-Petersburg, Russia, just give me a sign :)
Thank you once again for your kindness help !
--
Best regards,
Mate200
On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 18:48 +, gordon chung wrote:
>
> On 01/06/17 01:21 PM, mate...@mailbox.org wrote:
> >
> > Batch setting works like a charm ! I don
18 matches
Mail list logo
