If you'll be in Saint-Petersburg, Russia, just give me a sign :) Thank you once again for your kindness help !
-- Best regards, Mate200 On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 18:48 +0000, gordon chung wrote: > > On 01/06/17 01:21 PM, mate...@mailbox.org wrote: > > > > Batch setting works like a charm ! I don't see any errors in > > ceilometer-collector log. > > However, gnocchi-api runs like one process with two threads and uwsgi I run > > like two proccess with ten threads. > > It seems strange for me that uwsgi cannot handle that amount of data and > > gnocchi-api can, anyway Gordon thank you > > once > > again ! I owe you a beer ))) > > > > threading in uwsgi+gnocchi arguably does nothing (or at least last i > tried it did nothing... regardless, threading in python is not always > what you hope/expect). you'll want to play with that to see if it > actually does anything. for example, in my environment i have 32 > processes and 1 thread. regarding diff between uwsgi and gnocchi-api, i > don't have the technical knowledge for that, you'll probably want to ask > on openstack-dev list because the smart devs tend to read only that. > > i can't say no to a beer :) > > cheers, > > -- > gord > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
