Hi there! Tomorrow we'll have our next OpenStack Community App Catalog
meeting (Dec 3rd) at 1700UTC in #openstack-meeting-3
The agenda can be found here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/app-catalog
Please add agenda items if there's anything specific you would like to
discuss (or of cour
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Meeting Notes - 11/18/2015 - 1900 UTC
IRC Room: #openstack-meeting-4
Attendees:
* j^2 (87)
* mriedem (78)
* balajin (32)
* klindgren (29)
* xavpaice (19)
* openstack (3)
* Bjoern_ (1)
* BjoernT (1)
* ctina (1)
* serverascode (1)
# Agenda Topics
Pre
Did you try launching the docker container with the privilege flag? dib does a
lot of privileged things last I looked.
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Clint Byrum [cl...@fewbar.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 3:49 PM
To: openstack-operators
Subject: Re: [Opens
Excerpts from Abel Lopez's message of 2015-12-01 16:16:08 -0800:
> Hey everyone,
> I've been running diskimage-builder just fine for over a year inside various
> VMs, but now, I'm having to run it inside a docker container.
> I'm curious if anyone has experience with making the 'ubuntu latest' doc
I can describe our specific uses cases, not sure our same limitations apply to
everyone.
Every developer in our company has a project created for them (user-username)
they are allowed to spinup 5 vm's in this project to do dev/test/POC whatever.
These projects are not tied into show back or us
I can't think of a case where better error response and log messages are
not useful/desired.
Robert
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Mike Dorman wrote:
> We use some custom API policies (as in policy.json) to restrict certain
> operations to particular roles or requiring some fields on calls (i.
Sounds like a solid set of takeaways. I would be okay with eventlet
sticking around until uWSGI ( or a similar thing ) is available and
functions in a similar fashion for those of us who want to choose our web
server.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Steve Martinelli
wrote:
> Trying to summar
Are both metadata servers able to provide metadata for all instances of
both sides? If so, why not disable isolated metadata on one of the sides so
only one of the DHCP agents will respond?
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 6:49 AM, wrote:
> Hello stackers !
>
> Sorry, I also cross-posted that question h
On 12/2/2015 2:52 PM, Kris G. Lindgren wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if someone has a set of tools/code to work allow admins
to move vm's from one tenant to another? We get asked this fairly
frequently in our internal cloud (atleast once a week, more when we
start going through and cleaning u
We use some custom API policies (as in policy.json) to restrict certain
operations to particular roles or requiring some fields on calls (i.e. we
require that users give us an availability zone when booting an instance.)
When the policy causes the operation to be denied, the only response that g
No, unfortunately it's currently not possible to set it at anything other
than a global level when using the Neutron dnsmasq instances for resolution.
There is work going on this cycle to push names out to designate where you
can have suffixes specific to a port or to a network, but that won't be
Hello,
I was wondering if someone has a set of tools/code to work allow admins to move
vm's from one tenant to another? We get asked this fairly frequently in our
internal cloud (atleast once a week, more when we start going through and
cleaning up resources for people who are no longer with t
Hey all,
I wanted to send out a follow up on this. Yesterday in the keystone meeting
we voted on Mitaka specs that we would like to commit to. The
online-migration spec was accepted as something we would definitely like to
see [0]. On the other hand, the development team doesn't really have enough
As I'm sure you are aware, OpenStack has done its last Python 2.6
compatible release, and the test infrastructure is being unwound
rapidly.
We've one special case in the projects we manage - pbr - and I'm
trying to see if there is going to be enough impact that we need to
special case it for CI an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Just a friendly reminder we have our meeting in about and hour
(1900UTC), in #openstack-meeting-4.
Today's agenda[1] is pretty light, so please put your ideas thoughts
on it asap.
[1]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/osops-irc-meeting-201
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
> Dina,
>
> Is it possible just to get for performance team official status?
>
Not that I can see... but it's a good question. We have all sorts of
working groups, such as the API working group, that has a repo for
guidelines[1], but doesn't
We have had teams publish to readthedocs.org in the past. Linking to the docs
there from a home page in the wiki should make them discoverable.
Doug
> On Dec 2, 2015, at 4:01 AM, Dina Belova wrote:
>
> Thierry,
>
> the main issue is to publish docs somewhere people will be easily able to
>
I've been having some issues where I want to change the domain name for a given
project, I know I can do it globally by editing dhcp_domain in dhcp_agent.ini
but on a global scale, however when I look at the dnsmasq process I see the
final runtime param --domain=openstacklocal, is there any sen
Ack, thanks :)
Will send the repo creation request today.
Cheers,
Dina
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Thierry Carrez
wrote:
> Dina Belova wrote:
> > the main issue is to publish docs somewhere people will be easily able
> > to read them and leave feedback on them. So just repository with the
Dina Belova wrote:
> the main issue is to publish docs somewhere people will be easily able
> to read them and leave feedback on them. So just repository with the
> docs is not enough (wherever to place it, openstack/* is cool), we need
> a place to publish them. And as I understand, we need some e
Thierry,
the main issue is to publish docs somewhere people will be easily able to
read them and leave feedback on them. So just repository with the docs is
not enough (wherever to place it, openstack/* is cool), we need a place to
publish them. And as I understand, we need some excuse to publish
Dina Belova wrote:
> of course that's possible in future if there will be significant results
> and TC will recognise them ;)
>
> Ok, so I believe we may use Rally as a parent here, I may add new docs
> project as a child to Rally in programs.yam :)
> If everybody is ok with that, let's do it.
I'
Boris,
of course that's possible in future if there will be significant results
and TC will recognise them ;)
Ok, so I believe we may use Rally as a parent here, I may add new docs
project as a child to Rally in programs.yam :)
If everybody is ok with that, let's do it.
Cheers,
Dina
On Wed, Dec
Hi all,
we are looking at how ironic-inspector could integrate with external CMDB
solutions and be able fetch a minimal set of data needed for initial
introspection (e.g. IPMI credentials and IPs) from CMDB. This could
probably be achieved with data filters framework that is already in place,
but
24 matches
Mail list logo
