Re: [OpenStack-Infra] suggestions for gate optimizations

2014-01-21 Thread Russell Bryant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/2014 12:32 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Both of those options are costly in terms of node consumption. That > said I think it doesn't really make sense to build a 100-long gate > queue and assigning resources to that, when we know for > almost-

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] suggestions for gate optimizations

2014-01-21 Thread Thierry Carrez
Sean Dague wrote: > I have a couple of ideas about things we should do based on what I've > seen in the gate during this wedge. > [...] All good ideas. I would add a couple of.. more aggressive suggestions to the mix: = Parallel assume-1st-fail pipeline = John Dickinson's suggestion. Assume fir

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] suggestions for gate optimizations

2014-01-20 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/19/2014 11:38 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Monty Taylor > wrote: > > On 01/19/2014 05:38 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > > So, we're currently 70 deep in the gate, top of queue went in > > 40 hrs > ago (p

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] suggestions for gate optimizations

2014-01-19 Thread Michael Still
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: >> On 01/19/2014 05:38 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >>> = Pep8 kick out of check = >>> >>> I think on the Check Queue we should pep8 first, and not run other tests >>> until that passes (this rever

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] suggestions for gate optimizations

2014-01-19 Thread Joe Gordon
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 01/19/2014 05:38 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > >> So, we're currently 70 deep in the gate, top of queue went in > 40 hrs >> ago (probably closer to 50 or 60, but we only have enqueue time going >> back to the zuul restart). >> >> I have a couple

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] suggestions for gate optimizations

2014-01-19 Thread Michael Still
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 01/19/2014 03:50 PM, Michael Still wrote: >> I am currently triggering on comments on reviews where the jenkins run >> is more than 7 days old. If you want me to tweak the age rule I am >> more than happy to. > > Honestly, 7 days is good. I

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] suggestions for gate optimizations

2014-01-19 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/19/2014 03:50 PM, Michael Still wrote: > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: >> On 01/19/2014 05:38 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > > [snip] > >>> = Periodic recheck on old changes = >>> >>> I think Michael Still said he was working on this one. Certain projects, >>> like Glance

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] suggestions for gate optimizations

2014-01-19 Thread Michael Still
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 01/19/2014 05:38 AM, Sean Dague wrote: [snip] >> = Periodic recheck on old changes = >> >> I think Michael Still said he was working on this one. Certain projects, >> like Glance and Keystone, tend to approve things with really stale tes

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] suggestions for gate optimizations

2014-01-19 Thread Monty Taylor
On 01/19/2014 05:38 AM, Sean Dague wrote: So, we're currently 70 deep in the gate, top of queue went in > 40 hrs ago (probably closer to 50 or 60, but we only have enqueue time going back to the zuul restart). I have a couple of ideas about things we should do based on what I've seen in the gate