On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote: > On 01/19/2014 05:38 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
[snip] >> = Periodic recheck on old changes = >> >> I think Michael Still said he was working on this one. Certain projects, >> like Glance and Keystone, tend to approve things with really stale test >> results (> 1 month old). These fail, and then tumble. They are a be >> source of the wrecking balls. > > I believe he's got it working, actually. I think the real trick with this - > which I whole-heartedly approve of - is not making node starvation worse. Yes, I wrote this on Friday. I wanted to write it as a zuul turbo-hipster plugin, but that wasn't possible because of the way results are returned in a comment by zuul, so its just a stand along python script instead. I've been running it on and off over the weekend, but only while I can watch and hand verify what it does to build some trust. Node starvation is an issue, but we don't seem to be too bad at the moment in terms of check queue depth. >> Tests results > 1 week are clearly irrelevant. For something like nova, >>> >>> 3 days can be problematic. I am currently triggering on comments on reviews where the jenkins run is more than 7 days old. If you want me to tweak the age rule I am more than happy to. Michael -- Rackspace Australia _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
