On 23/03/16 13:05, Tom Fifield wrote:
On 23/03/16 11:19, Tom Fifield wrote:
On 23/03/16 00:14, Paul Belanger wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:32:23PM +0800, Tom Fifield wrote:
Hi all,
I'm sad to say that:
* spammers are back - 100-odd pages have gone in over the weekend
https://wiki.openst
On 23/03/16 11:19, Tom Fifield wrote:
On 23/03/16 00:14, Paul Belanger wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:32:23PM +0800, Tom Fifield wrote:
Hi all,
I'm sad to say that:
* spammers are back - 100-odd pages have gone in over the weekend
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Special:NewPages
* Cleanu
My intention is to make a series of rapid fire changes to the config files
while tailing the log files in order to quickly suss out if the spammers
are defeating or bypassing captcha and what change would need to be
implemented to prevent this from happening. Once we actually know what is
happening
On 23/03/16 00:14, Paul Belanger wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:32:23PM +0800, Tom Fifield wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> I'm sad to say that:
>>
>> * spammers are back - 100-odd pages have gone in over the weekend
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Special:NewPages
>>
>> * Cleanup was ineffective
On 2016-03-22 12:49:32 -0700 (-0700), Remo Mattei wrote:
> hi guys I have been on this list for many months and have not
> being able to attend, can someone remind me when the meeting is? I
> would love to provide / help and share some tips.
This was a one-time conference call (earlier today) wit
On 2016-03-22 08:23:08 -0500 (-0500), JP Maxwell wrote:
> If anyone wants to approve this I am still happy to help.
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/285641/1
Can you elaborate on how you intend to help which has to be done
first with root access to the server (rather than merely with the
assi
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Elizabeth K. Joseph
wrote:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/infra-newton-summit-planning
I've also gone ahead and added a section at the bottom for "Other
sessions of interest" for non-infra sessions that an infra presence
would be particularly valuable at.
We'
If anyone wants to approve this I am still happy to help.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/285641/1
I don't think you are ever going to be successful at blocking accounts or
IPs. You must block the creation of the spam by the bots. IMHO focusing on
improving the captcha or understanding the bypas
Nod, it is the right time to ask for this.
Regards
2016-03-22 20:07 GMT+01:00 Paul Belanger :
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:45:12AM -0700, Colleen Murphy wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Colleen Murphy
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Colleen Murphy
> > > wrote
hi guys I have been on this list for many months and have not being able to
attend, can someone remind me when the meeting is? I would love to provide /
help and share some tips.
Thanks
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 12:19, Cody A.W. Somerville
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Pau
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Paul Belanger
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:45:12AM -0700, Colleen Murphy wrote:
> > 3) how many vlans?
> > - one untagged for pxe/management, one tagged for public
> >
> I had to drop off after this point, but did we talk about them (HP team)
> wiring
> up
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:45:12AM -0700, Colleen Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Colleen Murphy
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Colleen Murphy
> > wrote:
> >
> >> The networking team at HPE received our request and would like to have a
> >> call next week to r
On 03/22/2016 02:45 PM, Colleen Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Colleen Murphy
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Colleen Murphy
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The networking team at HPE received our request and would like to have a
>>> call next week to review it. Our liaison,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Colleen Murphy
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Colleen Murphy
> wrote:
>
>> The networking team at HPE received our request and would like to have a
>> call next week to review it. Our liaison, Venu, should have a draft network
>> diagram we can revie
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:32:23PM +0800, Tom Fifield wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I'm sad to say that:
>
> * spammers are back - 100-odd pages have gone in over the weekend
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Special:NewPages
>
> * Cleanup was ineffective, with many spam pages still existing on the wi
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 08:23:08AM -0500, JP Maxwell wrote:
> If anyone wants to approve this I am still happy to help.
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/285641/1
>
Looking at the review, Jim would like to see more history of collaborting in git
first. Which is a fair requirement.
> I don't t
If anyone wants to approve this I am still happy to help.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/285641/1
I don't think you are ever going to be successful at blocking accounts or
IPs. You must block the creation of the spam by the bots. IMHO focusing on
improving the captcha or understanding the bypas
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:32:23PM +0800, Tom Fifield wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I'm sad to say that:
>
> * spammers are back - 100-odd pages have gone in over the weekend
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Special:NewPages
>
> * Cleanup was ineffective, with many spam pages still existing on the wi
Hi all,
I'm sad to say that:
* spammers are back - 100-odd pages have gone in over the weekend
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Special:NewPages
* Cleanup was ineffective, with many spam pages still existing on the
wiki (scroll through the NewPages link above)
Regards,
Tom
On 28/02/16
19 matches
Mail list logo
