Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Moving gantt to stackforge

2014-02-21 Thread Russell Bryant
On 02/21/2014 03:42 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Joe Gordon wrote: >>> The move to stackforge would make sense if it was developed by a nascent >>> separate group, but I don't think that's the case here ? >> >> I think this is the case, currently the core group on gantt is >> nova-core and Robert Co

[OpenStack-Infra] Suggestion to add new tempest jobs with different mq drivers

2014-02-21 Thread Arx Cruz
Hello, I've been having problems with my CI infra since yesterday. All my tests were failing, because of this merge: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59713/that pass probably because the CI uses rabbit as the default MQ driver, and ZeroMQ. Would be awesome to have jobs testing this MQ Drivers bef

[OpenStack-Infra] question on zuul layout.yaml on gate pipeline

2014-02-21 Thread Akihiro Motoki
Hi, I just looked zuul layout.yaml to confirm the condition of merging and I have a question on the gate pipeline trigger. layout.yaml has the following entry in gate pipeline. In my understanding, it means that when jenkins posts +1 verified comment, gate pipeline will start. My question is: je

Re: [OpenStack-Infra] Moving gantt to stackforge

2014-02-21 Thread Thierry Carrez
Joe Gordon wrote: >> The move to stackforge would make sense if it was developed by a nascent >> separate group, but I don't think that's the case here ? > > I think this is the case, currently the core group on gantt is > nova-core and Robert Collins, while the main commiter is Donald Dugger > (w