On 02/21/2014 03:42 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Joe Gordon wrote: >>> The move to stackforge would make sense if it was developed by a nascent >>> separate group, but I don't think that's the case here ? >> >> I think this is the case, currently the core group on gantt is >> nova-core and Robert Collins, while the main commiter is Donald Dugger >> (who asked for gantt to be kept around to play with). But now that we >> have decided that we have no use for the gantt repo, I don't think it >> makes sense for nova-core to take on the burdon of reviewing gantt >> patches. I know that I won't be anymore (I think I have reviewed >> every gantt patch to date). > > That's a fair point. In the end the granularity of a program is linked > to the interest of its team in general and its core reviewers team in > particular. If those don't overlap, you're better off with not having > that code repo under your program. > > From what you're saying that seems to be a "nascent separate group" > forming, in which case I agree stackforge is probably the best bet. >
Good points ... I don't think any of the current gantt-core are interested in reviewing right now. I'm happy to open up gantt-core to Don and whoever else would like to join him, but I would want to move it first. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra
