[openstack-dev] [Oslo][TaskFlow] Non-DAG Flows, Timers and External Events

2015-11-26 Thread milanisko k
Hello list, I've been busy investigating how to best introduce HA to Ironic Inspector and I got referred to TaskFlow. With Ironic Inspector, besides handling other issues, each Node being introspected undergoes couple of steps with side-effects. This can be described using a finite automaton[1].

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [ironic] Picking an official name for a subproject (ironic-inspector in this case)

2015-12-04 Thread milanisko k
Please, please, please, let's use that in case we decide to have a next major release :D -- milan 2015-12-04 16:38 GMT+01:00 Dmitry Tantsur : > On 12/04/2015 04:30 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > >> Julien Danjou wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Dec 04 2015, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: >>> >>> Specifically, I'm talk

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [stable] ironic-stable-maint update proposal

2017-04-27 Thread milanisko k
+1 Ruby if my vote counts ;) I hope Deva and Jay will return one day! -- milan čt 27. 4. 2017 v 18:10 odesílatel John Villalovos < openstack@sodarock.com> napsal: > Not sure if I get a vote but +1 for Ruby! :) > > Sorry to hear about the removals :( > > John > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:21

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Ironic-UI review requirements - single core reviews

2017-05-17 Thread milanisko k
út 16. 5. 2017 v 18:03 odesílatel Dmitry Tantsur napsal: > On 05/15/2017 09:10 PM, Julia Kreger wrote: > > All, > > > > In our new reality, in order to maximize velocity, I propose that we > > loosen the review requirements for ironic-ui to allow faster > > iteration. To this end, I suggest we mo

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][nova] Goodbye^W See you later

2017-06-08 Thread milanisko k
Best of luck, jroll! <3 milan čt 8. 6. 2017 v 14:46 odesílatel Jim Rollenhagen napsal: > Hey friends, > > I've been mostly missing for the past six weeks while looking for a new > job, so maybe you've forgotten me already, maybe not. I'm happy to tell you > I've found one that I think is a grea

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators][all][Ironic][Nova] The /service API endpoint

2017-06-20 Thread milanisko k
Hi, > 1) create a new API endpoint e.g. 'v1/service' that can report which conductor is managing given node. Additionally it can also report aliveness of all Ironic conductors and on which hosts they are running (similar to nova service-list) > 2) expose conductor_affinity in node-show (but re

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][ironic] Patch needed to merge to fix ironic-inspector grenade job

2017-07-17 Thread milanisko k
John++ Thanks for looking into this! -- milan po 17. 7. 2017 v 17:13 odesílatel John Villalovos < openstack@sodarock.com> napsal: > Hi Infra, > > We were hoping to get a review of: > https://review.openstack.org/483059 > Add the ironic-inspector services to features.yaml > openstack-infra/d

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic-staging-drivers core cleanup and additions

2017-08-22 Thread milanisko k
makes sense, +1 Cheers, milan út 22. 8. 2017 v 11:38 odesílatel Vladyslav Drok napsal: > Hey Dmitry, > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Dmitry Tantsur > wrote: > >> Hi all! >> >> This email concerns the ironic-staging-drivers project which is outside >> of the official Ironic governance. Pl

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][docs] I see, you see, we all see red*

2017-08-25 Thread milanisko k
čt 24. 8. 2017 v 12:19 odesílatel Alexandra Settle napsal: > Hey Ruby! > > > > Good point – thanks for bringing it up :) > > > > I was brought up to think that red was one of those colours that people > had different (and sometimes really negative) associations with. When I > look at our latest a

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Proposing Shivanand Tendulker for ironic-core

2017-10-03 Thread milanisko k
+1 :) -- milan út 3. 10. 2017 v 18:02 odesílatel Vladyslav Drok napsal: > +1 for Shiv > > > On 3 Oct 2017 11:20 a.m., "Sam Betts (sambetts)" > wrote: > > +1, > > > > Sam > > > > On 03/10/2017, 08:21, "tua...@vn.fujitsu.com" > wrote: > > > > +1 , Yes, I definitely agree with you. > > > > Regar

[openstack-dev] [ironic][inspector] Virtual Queens PTG

2017-10-06 Thread milanisko k
Folks, as there have been multiple questions about Inspector that I couldn't answer due to my PTG absence, I've decided to make it up to You and organise a virtual inspector-focused PTG call (over some BlueJeans or TBD). The other Inspector Cores gracefully agreed to. I've selected the times all

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][inspector] Virtual Queens PTG

2017-10-09 Thread milanisko k
odesílatel milanisko k napsal: > Folks, > > as there have been multiple questions about Inspector that I couldn't > answer due to my PTG absence, I've decided to make it up to You and > organise a virtual inspector-focused PTG call (over some BlueJeans or TBD). > > Th

Re: [openstack-dev] Update on Zuul v3 Migration - and what to do about issues

2017-10-11 Thread milanisko k
Hi, without any deeper investigation (yet) I'd like to share this patch status https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468712/ Seems Zuul voted -1 even though all jobs were green... Cheers, milan 2017-10-11 7:31 GMT+02:00 Rikimaru Honjo : > Hello, > > I'm trying to install & configure nodepool for Zuu

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][inspector] Virtual Queens PTG

2017-10-11 Thread milanisko k
pad[2]. Thanks for Your votes and looking forward to see You there! milan [1] https://beta.doodle.com/poll/q7m4mnvv3h7k8eae#table [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/inspector-queens-virtual-ptg po 9. 10. 2017 v 11:59 odesílatel milanisko k napsal: > Folks, > > I'd like to gently r

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

2017-10-17 Thread milanisko k
Hi Dan! thanks for the testing! I've got couple of questions... po 16. 10. 2017 v 20:04 odesílatel Dan Prince napsal: > On Wed, 2017-10-04 at 15:10 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > (top-posting, as it is not a direct response to a specific line) > > > > This is your friendly reminder that we'r

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

2017-10-17 Thread milanisko k
út 17. 10. 2017 v 13:06 odesílatel Dan Prince napsal: > On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 10:06 +0000, milanisko k wrote: > > > > Does it mean dnsmasq was run from a stand-alone container? > > Yes. There are separate containers for the ironic-inspector and > dnsmasq. > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] containerized undercloud in Queens

2017-10-18 Thread milanisko k
út 17. 10. 2017 v 17:14 odesílatel Dan Prince napsal: > On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 11:46 +0000, milanisko k wrote: > > > > How about the shared container? Wouldn't it be better not have to > > rely on t-h-t especially if we're "scheduling" (and probably

[openstack-dev] [TripleO][containers]ironic-inspector

2017-11-01 Thread milanisko k
Folks, = I've got a dilemma right now about how to proceed with containerising ironic-inspector: Fat Container -- put ironic-inspector and dnsmasq into a single container i.e consider a container as a complete inspection service shipping unit, use supervisord inside to fork an

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][containers]ironic-inspector

2017-11-03 Thread milanisko k
> On 11/1/17 7:04 PM, milanisko k wrote: > > Folks, > > = > > > > I've got a dilemma right now about how to proceed with containerising > > ironic-inspector: > > > > Fat Container > > -- > > put ironic-inspector and dns

[openstack-dev] [ironic][inspector] HA Demo

2017-11-14 Thread milanisko k
Folks, I'd like to share the progress of the HA Inspector effort with you. TL;DR I'm able to run 2 instances of ironic inspector in an active-active fashion in a modified devstack deployment. I've uploaded a Github repo containing my config&steps[1] to take to reproduce as well as a video[2] of m

[openstack-dev] [ironic-inspector] Resigning my core-reviewer duties

2018-01-03 Thread milanisko k
Folks, as announced already on the Ironic upstream meeting, I'm hereby resigning my core-reviewer duties. I've changed my downstream occupation recently and I won't be able to keep up anymore. Thank you all, I really enjoyed collaborating with the wonderful Ironic community! Best regards, milan

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic-inspector] Resigning my core-reviewer duties

2018-01-05 Thread milanisko k
čt 4. 1. 2018 v 10:00 odesílatel Dmitry Tantsur napsal: > On 01/03/2018 04:24 PM, milanisko k wrote: > > Folks, > > > > as announced already on the Ironic upstream meeting, I'm hereby > resigning my > > core-reviewer duties. I've changed my downstream

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] why do we need setting network driver per node?

2016-07-13 Thread milanisko k
> 1. we agreed on whether the 'network_interface' was, or was not, an interface that was similar to the existing power, deploy, ... interfaces so that it fit into the driver composition work with the network interface being environment- (binding a node to a particular Switch type) rather than HW-d

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Abandoning specs without recent updates

2016-08-05 Thread milanisko k
Hi Jay, I think it might be useful to share the list of those specs in here. Cheers, milan čt 4. 8. 2016 v 21:41 odesílatel Jay Faulkner napsal: > Hi all, > > I'd like to abandon any ironic-specs reviews that haven't had any updates > in 6 months or more. This works out to about 27 patches. Th

Re: [openstack-dev] Nova mascot

2016-08-11 Thread milanisko k
It doesn't have to be a star picture; maybe more of a star theme. Helium as simple example https://www.phy.anl.gov/mep/atta/images/he4_he6_he8_figure.jpg or the Alpha particle http://www.ionactive.co.uk/glossaryimages/002AlphaParticle_200by200.jpg or just the Alpha symbol http://natickhighwebdesign

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic-inspector-core team update

2016-09-26 Thread milanisko k
Thanks guys! :D -- milan po 26. 9. 2016 v 14:46 odesílatel Jim Rollenhagen napsal: > // jim > > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Dmitry Tantsur > wrote: > > Hi folks! > > > > As you probably know, Imre has decided to leave us for other challenges, > so > > our small core team has become even

[openstack-dev] [QA][infra][all] Measuring code coverage in integration tests

2016-09-27 Thread milanisko k
Dear Stackers, I'd like to gather some overview on the $Sub: is there some infrastructure in place to gather such stats? Are there any groups interested in it? Any plans to establish such infrastructure? Thanks! milan PS: I used to maintain a tool[1] that once collect multi-node integration test

[openstack-dev] [all][oslo] Parse ISO8601 (open) time intervals

2016-09-27 Thread milanisko k
Hello Stackers! The ironic inspector project keeps track of introspection finished_at time stamps. We're just discussing how to reasonably query time ranges over the API[1] to serve matching introspection statuses to the user. Wikipedia[2] mentions the ISO8601 time interval specification (and ther

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][infra][all] Measuring code coverage in integration tests

2016-09-29 Thread milanisko k
100-fold. I'm curious if the OS projects want to execute similar code measurements on e.g daily basis w/ selected DSVM jobs to collect stats. > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Jordan Pittier < > jordan.pitt...@scality.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Sep 27, 2

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][infra][all] Measuring code coverage in integration tests

2016-09-29 Thread milanisko k
, let this be c' > > Let diff = c \ c' > > 'diff' is where you're missing unit and functional tests coverage. > Assaf, the tool I linked is a monkey-patched coverage.py but the collector stores the stats in Redis --- gives the same accumulative collecting. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo] Parse ISO8601 (open) time intervals

2016-09-29 Thread milanisko k
út 27. 9. 2016 v 18:05 odesílatel Doug Hellmann napsal: > Excerpts from milanisko k's message of 2016-09-27 12:30:09 +: > > Hello Stackers! > > > > The ironic inspector project keeps track of introspection finished_at > time > > stamps. > > We're just discussing how to reasonably query time r

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic-inspector-core team update

2016-10-03 Thread milanisko k
Thanks guys! :) Cheers, milan po 3. 10. 2016 v 10:49 odesílatel Dmitry Tantsur napsal: > The change is in effect. Thanks for your hard work Milan! > > On 09/26/2016 02:55 PM, milanisko k wrote: > > Thanks guys! :D > > > > -- > > milan > > > > po 2

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo] Parse ISO8601 (open) time intervals

2016-10-04 Thread milanisko k
util/issues/295 [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/375045/5/specs/list-introspection-statuses.rst@69 čt 29. 9. 2016 v 19:05 odesílatel Julien Danjou napsal: On Tue, Sep 27 2016, milanisko k wrote: > I'd like to ask whether other projects need to parse time intervals and/or > how do th

[openstack-dev] [all][API WG] How does one best express a time interval as an API filtering query?

2016-10-06 Thread milanisko k
Dear API WG, We've got ourselves into a bike shedding situation[1] w/r the WG filtering suggestion[2]. What we find difficult is to express the ISO8601 time intervals[3][4] in accordance to the filtering suggestion. We'd like to have support for specifying multiple time intervals a node introspecti

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][infra][all] Measuring code coverage in integration tests

2016-10-06 Thread milanisko k
e referenced in the beginning of this thread used to enable tracing this way (with some filtering applied). Cheers, milan [1] https://coverage.readthedocs.io/en/coverage-4.2/subprocess.html#configuring-python-for-sub-process-coverage > andrea > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:12 PM Assaf Mul

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][API WG] How does one best express a time interval as an API filtering query?

2016-10-07 Thread milanisko k
Guys, thanks for the suggestions! I like the coma separation as well, it's the closest to the ISO style. Let me propose the update. Cheers, milan čt 6. 10. 2016 v 19:28 odesílatel Jay Pipes napsal: > On 10/06/2016 11:43 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2016-10-06 10:30:30 -0500 (-0500), Kevin

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][API WG] How does one best express a time interval as an API filtering query?

2016-10-10 Thread milanisko k
FYI The patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/383862/ Cheers, milan pá 7. 10. 2016 v 10:13 odesílatel milanisko k napsal: > Guys, > > thanks for the suggestions! I like the coma separation as well, it's the > closest to the ISO style. > Let me propose the update. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] next meeting is a spooky one

2016-10-19 Thread milanisko k
lol, I'm definitely carving a special meeting pumpkin :) Cheers, milan st 19. 10. 2016 v 18:01 odesílatel Loo, Ruby napsal: > Hi, > > > > Since the Barcelona summit is next week, the Monday (Oct 24) ironic > meeting is cancelled. > > > > We'll have a spooky meeting the week after (Oct 31). Feel

[openstack-dev] [api]

2016-11-14 Thread milanisko k
Hello API WG! I'd like to ask about possible ``=in:``[1] operator negation implementation Should the implementation be a negative field name such as ``?state=in:a,b,c¬_state=in:x,y,z``? Or rather a negated operator: ``?state=in:a,b,c&state=not_in:x,y,z``? There already is the ``=neq:`` operator sp

Re: [openstack-dev] [api]

2016-11-16 Thread milanisko k
Guys, thanks for the responses, so far we've got (if I'm not mistaken): ?state=nin: 3 (including me) ?state=not_in: 1 ?state=out: 0 ?not_state=in: 0 I'd like to finish this poll by EOW so that more folks have the opportunity to express their preference. Cheers, milan 2016-11-15 13:50

Re: [openstack-dev] [api]

2016-11-18 Thread milanisko k
Sorry Ed, was a bank holiday in here yesterday. Did the API WG conclude on a preferred operator name? Cheers, milan st 16. 11. 2016 v 15:43 odesílatel Ed Leafe napsal: On Nov 16, 2016, at 7:42 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > If you're including me as a vote for nin, you should also consider me as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [api]

2016-11-18 Thread milanisko k
No prob! Just needed a hint preferably before we'd merge the new API endpoint spec for the inspector [1] Cheers, milan [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/375045/10/specs/list-introspection-statuses.rst pá 18. 11. 2016 v 11:26 odesílatel Chris Dent napsal: > On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, mil