Guys, thanks for the input! I've just reported an rfe-issue on dateutils[1]. I'm proposing an "?finished_at=ISO/ISO" format of time interval for the Inspector[2], let's see where the reviews are going to get us.
Thanks again! milan [1] https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/issues/295 [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/375045/5/specs/list-introspection-statuses.rst@69 čt 29. 9. 2016 v 19:05 odesílatel Julien Danjou <jul...@danjou.info> napsal: On Tue, Sep 27 2016, milanisko k wrote: > I'd like to ask whether other projects need to parse time intervals and/or > how do they achieve that. We kind of do that in Gnocchi, but we do with 2 fields: one ISO8601 timestamp and a timestamp field, which we parse using pytimeparse, you (can check gnocchi.utils.to_timespan). -- Julien Danjou /* Free Software hacker https://julien.danjou.info */
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
