Hello,
I am dealing with the bug
*1308958*. I have
some questions with the details.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
designs of the specific component?
Thanks, Hao
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Hao Wang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am dealing with the bug
> *1308958*. I have
> some questions with the details.
>
___
OpenStack-dev mailing
Hi,
I have got one question: if there is something wrong with a test case, and
it causes the review can proceed, what should I do?
Thanks,
Hao
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
Hi guys,
I notice nova have a clarification of project scope:
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/project_scope.html
I want to find cinder's, but failed, do you know where to find it?
It's important to let developers know what feature should be
introduced into cinder and what shouldn't.
B
t 11:44:19AM +, Dulko, Michal wrote:
>> On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 10:56 +0800, hao wang wrote:
>> > Hi guys,
>> >
>> > I notice nova have a clarification of project scope:
>> > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/project_scope.html
>> >
>&
Hi Philipp,
2015-11-30 14:36 GMT+08:00 Philipp Marek :
> Hi Hao Wang,
>
>> In fact, there is a reason that I ask this question. Recently I have a
>> confusion about if cinder should provide the ability of Disaster
>> Recovery to storage resources, like volum
ality.
Yes, this will convince me about DR in Cinder, very clearly, thanks.
>
> On 30 November 2015 at 03:45, hao wang wrote:
>>
>> Sean and Michal,
>>
>> In fact, there is a reason that I ask this question. Recently I have a
>> confusion about if cinder shou
Thanks very much, Anita, very usefully information, I will check it.
2015-11-30 23:36 GMT+08:00 Anita Kuno :
> On 11/29/2015 02:02 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:44:19AM +, Dulko, Michal wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 10:56 +0800, hao wang w
t an easy problem to solve. Not that we should rush on this
> problem, but we should start thinking about how to solve this as some
> backends can only replicate a CG or a pool of volumes.
>
> Thanks,
> Xing
>
>
>
> On 11/30/15, 4:51 AM, "hao wang" wrote:
>
&
t; BR
>> WangHao
>>
>> 2015-11-30 3:02 GMT+08:00 Sean McGinnis :
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:44:19AM +, Dulko, Michal wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 10:56 +0800, hao wang wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
Thanks to Andrea for clarifying this complex and long history problem.
As he says, we have talked about many solutions, and finally we found
this using nova-mange to call the terminate_connection and clean the
bdm entry.
It's simple and clear IMO and no bad impact to Nova API.
2015-12-03 1:37 GMT
Hi, stackers,
I found an error in OpenStack architecture picture in docs:
http://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ops/content/architecture.html.
In OpenStack Logical Architecture picture, Cinder's database is named "nova
database", it's not correct. It should be "cinder database".
___
Great! Thanks to fix this.
2016-05-11 11:31 GMT+08:00 Lana Brindley :
> On 11/05/16 12:58, hao wang wrote:
>> Hi, stackers,
>>
>> I found an error in OpenStack architecture picture in docs:
>> http://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ops/content/architecture.html.
hi, Janice
This idea seems to me that is useful to detect the state of
cinder-volume process more quickly, but I feel there is another issue
that if the back-end device go to fail you still
can't keep cloud in ha or create volume successfully since the service
is up but device is down.
So, what I
Hi, dong.wenjuan
Sounds very interesting about "doctor" project. What's timezone about the
weekly meeting?
I want to join it if I have time by then.
Thanks
Wang Hao
2016-02-01 14:43 GMT+08:00 :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I proposed the spec of Add-ServiceGroup-using-Tooz in Ciner[1].
>
> Project
Thanks Vipin*, *it's very helpful.
2015-06-14 16:23 GMT+08:00 Vipin Balachandran :
> Sorry for the long delay. This is fixed in oslo.vmware 0.9.0.
>
>
> https://github.com/openstack/oslo.vmware/commit/a229faf8ba59724a4fda3f37d5a7473376f93d9c
>
>
>
>
>
>
also take
> a shot at refactoring manage_existing flow in manager. It seem simple
> enough but maybe there are some improvement that we can do to make it more
> readable.
>
>
>
> *From:* hao wang [mailto:sxmatch1...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 2, 2015 11:30 AM
Cinder now doesn't check the existing resource when user lower the quota.
It's reasonable for admin can adjust the quota limit to lower level than
current usage.
But it also bring confusion that I have received to end user, they saw the
current usage
was more than limit, but they can't create resou
x27;s an optional argument that
>> by default preserves current behavior (force = True), then it shouldn't
>> break anything for all callers that don't use that new option.
>>
>> And for those that want the new behavior, they can always pass force set
>> to fa
Sure, I have got this review link. :)
2015-07-10 16:10 GMT+08:00 Dulko, Michal :
> Feel free to start the work. Right now I’m working on c-vol’s
> create_volume flow. Review is there:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/193167/
>
>
>
> *From:* hao wang [mailto:sxmatch1.
ourse we can implement this
purpose by using current APIs, it's a alternatives, but it depends on the
application which is top on cinder I think, and is hard to have consistent.
2015-07-11 7:24 GMT+08:00 Mike Perez :
> On 12:30 Jul 10, hao wang wrote:
> > Cinder now doesn't chec
x27;I've reduced
> your quota, now delete some resources to get under it'. It honestly sounds
> like the right thing to do here is to educate the admins who are surprised
> by the current behaviour, rather than to introduce a new behaviour that is
> fundamentally no better.
&
Hi stackers,
I found now cinder only can configure one storage_availability_zone for
cinder-volume. If using multi-backend in one cinder-volume node, could we
have different AZ for each backend? So that we can specify each backend as
a AZ and create volume in this AZ.
Regards,
Wang Hao
_
else, but I do worry that it encorages people to misunderstand or worse
> intentionally fake multiple AZs.
>
>
> On 19 July 2015 at 05:19, hao wang wrote:
>
>> Hi stackers,
>>
>> I found now cinder only can configure one storage_availability_zone for
>> cinde
types will be available in every AZ. You could certainly use volume types
> to identify redundant storage within one AZ, or there are scheduler hints
> to achieve the same effect.
>
> I think that you/we should work on making these concepts clearer to
> new-comers and admins, and
I wonder why user need to use this kind of image(vm snapshot) to create
volume, and then use this volume to create a vm again. It's meaningless I
think. On the other hand, if an image size is zero, cinder shouldn't allow
to create this volume from image.
2015-07-27 9:39 GMT+08:00 Zhenyu Zheng :
>
Hi, stackers
Since now we have merged filtering guideline[1], is that said we should
implement this feature according this guideline? like this:
*"GET /app/items?f_updated_at=gte:some_timestamp"*
Do we have reached a consensus about this?
2015-06-19 17:07 GMT+08:00 Chris Dent :
>
> There's an
I think cinder allow detach volume when it's under migration, but the
volume status will not become 'detaching' or 'available'.
See the code of begin_detaching in cinder:
# If we are in the middle of a volume migration, we don't want the
user
# to see that the volume is 'detaching
Sorry if I missed something, since now we have supported backup in-use
volumes in L, so I wonder is there some plan or design to support
restoring on-line volumes.
Thanks.
--
Best Wishes For You!
__
OpenStack Development M
and we should introduce it into projects(some projects already have it.).
2015-08-11 6:34 GMT+08:00 Everett Toews :
> On Aug 9, 2015, at 11:03 PM, hao wang wrote:
>
> Hi, stackers
>
> Since now we have merged filtering guideline[1], is that said we should
> implement this fe
+08:00 John Griffith :
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:47 AM, hao wang wrote:
>
>> Sorry if I missed something, since now we have supported backup in-use
>> volumes in L, so I wonder is there some plan or design to support
>> restoring on-line volumes
and they should shut
down the instance first and then restore volume.
2015-08-11 11:30 GMT+08:00 hao wang :
> @Duncan and John, thank you both and I have understood this. The reason I
> ask this question is we can't restore the boot volume of instance which is
> boot-from-volume, sin
+08:00 John Griffith :
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:54 PM, hao wang wrote:
>
>> @Duncan and John, I have a idea about this issue, if volume is in-use
>> but the instance which it's attached to is power-off, so can we avoid data
>> corruption? If it's true, cinde
Thanks Mike for summary. About the Getting rid of API extensions, I'd
like help to move the extensions over to the core. Do we should begin this
work at Mitaka?
2015-08-17 23:53 GMT+08:00 Mike Perez :
> A *summary* of the Cinder midcycle sprint, in attempt to keep your
> attention.
> Full meeti
I feel supporting multi drivers of zonemanager in one cinder.conf is
not much value.
How you can decide when to use driver-1 or driver-2?
2015-08-14 10:20 GMT+08:00 Chenying (A) :
>Hi,
>
>
>
> Jay S. Bryant, Daniel Wilson .Thank you for your reply. Now I know that in
> this case I need two ci
2015-09-02 17:19 GMT+08:00 Gorka Eguileor :
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:30:26AM -0600, John Griffith wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Tom Barron wrote:
>>
>> > [Yesterday while discussing the following issue on IRC, jgriffith
>> > suggested that I post to the dev list in preparation for
Well, I'm a new guy in Zaqar, but still glad to +1 to vote Fei Long.
2015-09-14 14:43 GMT+08:00 Fei Long Wang :
> Greeting,
>
> I'd like to announce my candidacy for the Zaqar PTL in Mikata.
>
> I've been working on and contributing to Zaqar since Icehouse release as a
> core developer. That said,
Thanks Mike ! Your help is very important to me to get started in
cinder and we do a lot of proud work with your leadership.
2015-09-15 6:36 GMT+08:00 John Griffith :
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Sean McGinnis
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:15:44AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote:
>
Thanks Sean, Vote +1.
2015-09-14 22:49 GMT+08:00 Sean McGinnis :
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm announcing my candidacy for Cinder PTL for the Mitaka release.
>
> The Cinder team has made great progress. We've not only grown the
> number of supported backend drivers, but we've made significant
> improv
Not a core, but still happy to +1 for Sean. His review is important to
improve our work.
Thanks to Avishay for your contribution in cinder.
2015-05-27 5:42 GMT+08:00 Ivan Kolodyazhny :
> +1,
>
> Welcome to the team, Sean.
>
> Regards,
> Ivan Kolodyazhny
>
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:07 AM, J
The default timeout about vCenter server(5.5 used) is 30 minutes, so when
session is timeout and then concurrent create two volumes through cinder
API. There will be one of volumes creation failed.
The error log is here: http://paste.openstack.org/show/246678/
Looks like if there is concurrent re
Hi, folks,
There is a cinder bp:Implement function to manage/unmanage snapshots(
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144590/), that we use taskflow to
implement this feature.
So I need your guys' help(cinder & taskflow) to push this forward.
Thanks.
--
Best Wishes For You!
Very glad to +1 for Eva, she is a very good reviewer and coder!
2016-03-01 11:00 GMT+08:00 Victoria Martínez de la Cruz
:
> A huge +1 for this proposal.
>
> Eva has joined as an Outreachy intern for this round and she impacted the
> Zaqar project in a truly positive way.
>
> Thanks for all your co
I prefer to the sub-state with a bit more detail. It will be simple for
horizon or others to get the more detail error message from cinder.
Maybe we can define some template messages(according to kinds of error
reason, more general) to avoid specify driver info back to end user.
2015-04-14 0:24
Hi, everyone
There is a Nova bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1408865.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147042/
The bug Scenario is:
1. create a vm using bootable volume.
2. delete this vm
3. restart service nova-compute when vm's task state is deleting.
When nova-compute is up, vm be
1.Raise exception to make to set vm status to error,and user can
> re-perform a delete action to clean up successfully.
> 2.Add full set of cinder admin credentials in nova.conf(just like what
> neutron does with nova) and make sure nova can clean up in init_host
>
>
>
> O
Hi, stackers,
I'm trying to use Guru Meditation Report in Zaqar project which can
support uwsgi server. I imported gmr and used
"gmr.TextGuruMeditation.setup_autorun(version, conf=conf)", but it
didn't work under uwsgi mode.
Did I do something wrong, or GMR doesn't support uwsgi mode yet?
Th
ging a file modification date [2].
>
> Thanks,
> Roman
>
> [1]
> https://code.google.com/archive/p/modwsgi/wikis/ConfigurationDirectives.wiki#WSGIRestrictSignal
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/260976/
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:02 AM, hao wang wrote:
>> Hi, stackers
+1
Thanks LiuSheng for good reviewing and keeping contribution.
2017-03-20 16:41 GMT+08:00 Rui Chen :
> +1
>
> Liusheng is a responsible reviewer and keep good reviewing quality in Mogan.
>
> Thank you working hard for Mogan, Liusheng.
>
> 2017-03-20 16:19 GMT+08:00 Zhenguo Niu :
>>
>> Hi team,
>
Hi,
We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan.
Essential Priorities
1.Node aggregates (liudong, zhangyang, zhenguo)
---
blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/node-aggregate
sp
Hi!
Zaqar now have a lot of commands in openstackclient, but some of them don't
have a consistent command name.
For example:
queue_list = zaqarclient.queues.v2.cli:ListQueues
queue_create = zaqarclient.queues.v2.cli:CreateQueue
queue_delete = zaqarclient.queues.v2.cli:DeleteQueue
Hi!
Zaqar now have a lot of commands in openstackclient, but some of them don't
have a consistent command name.
For example:
queue_list = zaqarclient.queues.v2.cli:ListQueues
queue_create = zaqarclient.queues.v2.cli:CreateQueue
queue_delete = zaqarclient.queues.v2.cli:DeleteQueue
Hi,
We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan.
Essential Priorities
1. New flavors (zhenguo, liusheng)
--
bluepring: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/new-flavor
spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/4
Hi,
We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan.
Essential Priorities
1. New flavors (zhenguo, liusheng)
--
blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/new-flavor
spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/4
Hi,
We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan.
Essential Priorities
1. New flavors (zhenguo, liusheng)
--
blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/new-flavor
spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/4
Hi,
We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan.
See the details below:
Essential Priorities
==
1. Track resources using placement service (liusheng, zhenguo)
blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/track-resources-using-placement
spec: https://review
Hi,
We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan.
See the details below:
Essential Priorities
==
1. Track resources using placement service (liusheng, zhenguo)
blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/track-resources-using-placement
spec: https://review
Hi, Sean
It's very nice to work together with you in Cinder team, I just want
to thank you for your hard work in those cycles.
I have been there for 4 years, fortunately we have very great PTLs
and Cores to help our new guys to grow up.
No matter if you are PTL in next cycle, it's both very hap
+1, very happy to work together with Zhenguo, I'm sure he will be a
great PTL in Mogan.
2017-08-09 16:33 GMT+08:00 Sheng Liu :
> +1,
>
> Zhenguo has done great work for Mogan in the past year, and he is already
> running as a competent PTL!
>
> 2017-08-03 20:17 GMT+08:00 Zhenguo Niu :
>>
>> Hi all
Hi,
We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan.
We have finish a lot of wonderful work in Pike release, and Mogan will
have her first release!
See the details below:
Essential Priorities
==
1. Node aggregates (liudong, zhangyang, zhenguo)
blueprint: https://blueprint
Hi,
We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan.
We have finish a lot of wonderful work in Pike release, and Mogan will
have her first release!
See the details below:
Essential Priorities
==
1. Node aggregates (liudong, zhangyang, zhenguo)
blueprint: https://blueprin
Hi,
We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan.
See the details below:
Essential Priorities
==
1. Node aggregates (liudong, zhangyang, zhenguo)merged
blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/node-aggregate
spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/47
Hi,
We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan.
See the details below:
Essential Priorities
==
1. Adopt servers (wanghao, litao)
blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/manage-existing-bms
spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459967/ merged
code:
+1
I'm very exciting to hear this. gecong is an great contributor in
Zaqar project, hope we can work together to make more awesome
features done in Zaqar.
2017-10-11 15:41 GMT+08:00 Thomas Herve :
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:15 PM, feilong wrote:
>> Hi team,
>>
>> I would like to propose adding
Thanks Feilong, it's very great to work together with you !
2018-01-23 10:56 GMT+08:00 Fei Long Wang :
> Hi team,
>
> I have been working on Zaqar for more than 4 years and serving the PTL
> for the past 5 cycles. I don't plan to run for Zaqar PTL again for the
> Rocky release. I think it's time
+1, I'm glad to hear this, zhenyu is a great contributor in Zaqar
team. Hope your great work in Rocky as well.
2018-02-27 17:22 GMT+08:00 Xiyuan Wang :
> +1, zhenyu has done a lot of useful features in Zaqar. Such as delay queue
> and message abstract support. Some others are on the list for Rock
Hi all,
This is my self-nomination to continue running as Zaqar PTL for the Stein cycle.
We did a great job in Rocky. Supported the different format of client id to be
more suitable for more use cases. We also introduced the function to query
queues filtered by name and metadata in mongodb backen
+1 to Julia's suggestion, Cinder should also have a spec to discuss
the detail about how to implement the creation of volume from an
encrypted image.
Julia Kreger 于2018年9月28日周五 上午9:39写道：
>
> Greetings!
>
> I suspect the avenue of at least three different specs is likely going
> to be the best path
68 matches
Mail list logo
