Sean and Michal, In fact, there is a reason that I ask this question. Recently I have a confusion about if cinder should provide the ability of Disaster Recovery to storage resources, like volume. I mean we have volume replication v1&v2, but for DR, specially DR between two independent OpenStack sites(production and DR site), I feel we still need more features to support it, for example consistency group for replication, etc. I'm not sure if those features belong in Cinder or some new project for DR.
BR WangHao 2015-11-30 3:02 GMT+08:00 Sean McGinnis <sean.mcgin...@gmx.com>: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:44:19AM +0000, Dulko, Michal wrote: >> On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 10:56 +0800, hao wang wrote: >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > I notice nova have a clarification of project scope: >> > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/project_scope.html >> > >> > I want to find cinder's, but failed, do you know where to find it? >> > >> > It's important to let developers know what feature should be >> > introduced into cinder and what shouldn't. >> > >> > BR >> > Wang Hao >> >> I believe Nova team needed to formalize the scop to have an explanation >> for all the "this doesn't belong in Nova" comments on feature requests. >> Does Cinder suffer from similar problems? From my perspective it's not >> critically needed. > > I agree. I haven't seen a need for something like that with Cinder. Wang > Hao, is there a reason you feel you need that? > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
