Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] Proposal to add Amrith Kumar to trove-core

+1 On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Robert Myers wrote: > +1 > > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Tim Simpson > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> From: Sergey Gotliv [sgot...@redhat.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 8:11 AM >> To: openstack-dev@lists.open

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] datastore migration issues

I am fine with requiring the deployer to update default values, if they don’t make sense for their given deployment. However, not having any value for older/existing instances, when the code requires it is not good. So let’s create a default datastore of mysql, with a default version, and set tha

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Delivering datastore logs to customers

Yep agreed, this is a great idea. We really only need two API calls to get this going: - List available logs to ‘save’ - Save a log (to swift) Some additional points to consider: - We don’t need to create a record of every Log ‘saved’ in Trove. These entries, treated as a Trove resource aren’t u

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Delivering datastore logs to customers

s - new Logs saved would just add to what may already exist. If the user chooses they don’t need the logs, they can perform the delete directly in Swift. > Thanks, > Daniel > From: Vipul Sabhaya > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questi

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Proposal to add Auston McReynolds to trove-core

+1 Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 30, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Craig Vyvial wrote: > > +1 > > >> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Greg Hill wrote: >> +1 >> >>> On Dec 27, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Michael Basnight wrote: >>> >>> Howdy, >>> >>> Im proposing Auston McReynolds (amcrn) to trove-core. >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] MariaDB support

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Don Kehn wrote: > check with the trove folks they might be testing percona. > > We don’t test Nova or other Openstack pieces against Percona. We do test Percona as a underlying datastore within Trove though. > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Michael Still w

[openstack-dev] [Cue] project update

Hello, Thanks to those who I met personally at the Summit for your feedback on the project. For those that don’t know what Cue is, we’re building a Message Broker Provisioning service for Openstack. More info can be found here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cue Since the summit, we’re working

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] Proposal to add Craig Vyvial to trove-core

+1 On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:09 AM, McReynolds, Auston wrote: > +1 > > On 5/6/14, 2:31 AM, "Nikhil Manchanda" wrote: > > > > >Hello folks: > > > >I'm proposing to add Craig Vyvial (cp16net) to trove-core. > > > >Craig has been working with Trove for a while now. He has been a > >consistently ac

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Trove] Managed Instances Feature

On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 04/06/2014 09:02 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Hopper, Justin > > wrote: > > > > Russell, > > > > At this point the guard that Nova needs to provide around the > ins

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Zaqar and SQS Properties of Distributed Queues

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > My understanding of Zaqar is that it's like SQS. SQS uses distributed > queues, > > which have a few unusual properties [0]: > > Message Order > > > > > > Amazon SQS makes a best effort to preserve order in messages, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] Proposal to add Iccha Sethi to trove-core

+1 > On Oct 30, 2014, at 1:47 AM, Nikhil Manchanda wrote: > > Hello folks: > > I'm proposing to add Iccha Sethi (iccha on IRC) to trove-core. > > Iccha has been working with Trove for a while now. She has been a > very active reviewer, and has provided insightful comments on > numerous review

[openstack-dev] Introducing Project Cue

vision, I plan to host a meetup in the design summit area of the Le Meridien on *Friday morning*. More details to come. Thanks! -Vipul Sabhaya HP ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [openstack-dev] Introducing Project Cue

We will be meeting folks that are interested in discussing Cue at *10 AM on Friday at the Trove Pod* in the “Program Pods” section of the Design Summit. Looking forward to seeing folks there! -Vipul HP On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Vipul Sabhaya wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I woul

Re: [openstack-dev] [TROVE] Thoughts on DNS refactoring, Designate integration.

> On Oct 1, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Michael Basnight wrote: > >> On Oct 1, 2013, at 3:06 PM, Ilya Sviridov wrote: >> >> >>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Tim Simpson >>> wrote: >>> Hi fellow Trove devs, >>> >>> With the Designate project ramping up, its time to refactor the ancient DNS >>> c

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Configuration API BP

> On Sep 26, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Michael Basnight wrote: > >> On Sep 25, 2013, at 7:16 PM, Craig Vyvial wrote: >> >> So we have a blueprint for this and there are a couple things to point out >> that have changed since the inception of this BP. >> >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/trove/+spe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] How users should specify a datastore type when creating an instance

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Michael Basnight wrote: > > On Oct 21, 2013, at 1:40 PM, Tim Simpson wrote: > > >>> 2. I also think a datastore_version alone should be sufficient since > the associated datastore type will be implied: > > > >> When i brought this up it was generally discussed as b

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] How users should specify a datastore type when creating an instance

On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Ilya Sviridov wrote: > Totally agree, however current concept supposes working with type and > version as different entities, even if it is the attributes on one thing - > the configuration. > > The reason for storing it as separate models can be cases when we are

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my concerns

Thanks for starting this thread Josh. On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Hi all, > > I was reading over the TC IRC logs for this week (my weekly reading) and I > just wanted to let my thoughts and comments be known on: > > > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2015/t

[openstack-dev] [Cue] PTL Candidacy

Hello, This will be the first official PTL election for Cue, and I would be honored to serve another term leading the project for the M Cycle. Cue is a relatively new project in Openstack, and was approved into the Big Tent during Liberty. I have been involved with Cue from the beginning, from i

[openstack-dev] [Cue] Design Session

Hi! Cue is holding a design session to talk about some of the priorities for Liberty, Thursday from 3:20pm to 4:00pm at the couches outside of room 220. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-cue-design Come and join us to learn more! ___

[openstack-dev] [Cue] contributors meetup

The Cue team will be crashing the Designate contributors meetup Friday at 1:20pm, in room 214. Come find us there! -vipul __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@list

[openstack-dev] Stepping Down from Trove Core

Having not been very active in Trove for the past few months, it’s time to step down from the core team. I’ll be focusing primarily on Cue going forward, getting it included into the Big Tent, and making it production worthy. >From RedDwarf to Trove to Onwards and Upwards! -Vipul ___

[openstack-dev] [tc][Cue] Add Cue to OpenStack

Hello OpenStack TC and stackers! We’ve submitted a patch to add Cue to the OpenStack project list. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191173/ For those not familiar, Cue is a Message Broker Provisioning and Lifecycle Management service for OpenStack. We’ve focused initially on RabbitMQ, and are s

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] Core reviewer update

+1 to all the nominations. Many thanks to the departing cores for their contributions and bringing Trove to where it is today. > On Feb 5, 2015, at 9:02 AM, Craig Vyvial wrote: > > +1 +1 +1 > I think these nominations will help grow the trove community. > > -Craig > >> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo][TaskFlow] Proposal for new core reviewer (min pae)

+1 Congrats Min! On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Greetings all stackers, > > I propose that we add Min Pae[1] to the taskflow-core team[2]. > > Min has been actively contributing to taskflow for a while now, both in > helping prove taskflow out (by being a user via the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] how to send messages (and events) to our users

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Min Pae wrote: > > >> "an under-the-clould service" ? - That is not what I am after here. >> >> I think the thread went off on a tangent and this point got lost. A user > facing notification system absolutely should be a web centric protocol, as > I imagine one of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Call for adoption (or exclusion?)

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: > Another parallel is Manilla vs Swift. Both provides something like a share > for users to store files. > > The former is a multitenant api to provision non multitenant file shares. > The latter is a multitenant api to provide file sharing. >