Hi Summit, Eugene
We have submitted a Heat template for advanced services.
This is combination of LBaaS, FWaaS and VPN.
This is a also good demo for how to use neutron services.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58496/1
It is great if we could get feedback from yours.
FYI, here is existing heat
1/26 Steve Baker :
> On 11/27/2013 07:16 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>
> Hi Summit, Eugene
>
> We have submitted a Heat template for advanced services.
> This is combination of LBaaS, FWaaS and VPN.
> This is a also good demo for how to use neutron services.
>
> https://revie
Hi Vijay
I was thinking about we should store this kind of information on the keystone.
However, I changed my mind after checking keystone API.
The keystone api is very generic, so we can't provider application
specific helper method and validations on that.
The form of certificate is different b
Great tool especially for non-native guys such as me!
Thanks Joe
Best
Nachi
2013/12/3 Sylvain Bauza :
> Great tool !
> Just discovered that openstack.common.rpc does have typos, another good
> reason to migrate to oslo.messaging.rpc :-)
>
> -Sylvain
>
>
> 2013/12/3 Joe Gordon
>>
>> HI all,
>>
>
2013/12/3 John Griffith :
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>>> HI all,
>>>
>>> Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to
>>> point out a really nifty tool to detect commonly misspelled words. So
>>>
2013/12/3 John Griffith :
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> 2013/12/3 John Griffith :
>>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>>> On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>>>>> HI all,
>>>>>
Hi folks
OK, It looks like we get consensus on
separate resource" way.
Best
Nachi
2013/12/5 Eugene Nikanorov :
> Hi,
>
> My vote is for separate resource (e.g. 'New Model'). Also I'd like to see
> certificate handling as a separate extension/db mixing(in fact, persistence
> driver) similar to se
Hi Yong
Yes, to support multiple subnet is on the roadmap.
I'll definitely welcome your help :P
2013/12/5 Yongsheng Gong :
> I think we should allow more than subnet_id in one vpnservice object.
> but the model below limits only one subnet_id is used.
> https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/m
Thanks!
Commented on bp whiteboard.
2013/12/5 Yongsheng Gong :
> ok, My pleasure to help,
> I created a bp for it:
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/vpn-multiple-subnet
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> Hi Yong
>>
&
Hi Yong
NSX have two kind of router.
Edge and distributed router.
Edge node will work as some VPN services and advanced service nodes.
Actually, VPNaaS OSS impl is running in l3-agent.
so IMO, we need l3-agent also for basis of some edge services.
2013/12/9 Yongsheng Gong :
> If distributed
I'm +1 for 'provider'.
2013/12/9 Akihiro Motoki :
> Neutron defines "provider" attribute and it is/will be used in advanced
> services (LB, FW, VPN).
> Doesn't it fit for a distributed router case? If we can cover all services
> with one concept, it would be nice.
>
> According to this thread, w
+1 ! I'll join.
I'm also working on investigating how to use openstack gating system.
(This document is still draft version)
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1WJInaSt_H2kVkjnhtPmiATP1F-0BVbuk1eefQalL5Q0/edit#slide=id.p
2013/12/10 Ivar Lazzaro :
> +1 for 1700UTC Thursday on IRC
>
> -Origi
Hi Salvatore
The metadata server is working well? (or may be timing issue)
I saw similar issue when VM failed to get the certificate from the
metadata server.
Best
Nachi
2013/12/27 Salvatore Orlando :
> Yair,
>
> The 'isolated' mode makes the tempest session more realistic by simulating a
> clou
Hi Anita
Let's me join this session also.
Nachi Ueno
NTT i3
2014/1/5 Anita Kuno :
> On 01/05/2014 03:42 AM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> I finally got over my fear of weather and booked my flight and hotel for
>> this sprint.
>>
>> I am
Hi folks
OpenStack process tend to have many config options, and many hosts.
It is a pain to manage this tons of config options.
To centralize this management helps operation.
We can use chef or puppet kind of tools, however
sometimes each process depends on the other processes configuration.
For
Hi Flavio
Thank you for your input.
I agree with you. oslo.config isn't right place to have server side code.
How about oslo.configserver ?
For authentication, we can reuse keystone auth and oslo.rpc.
Best
Nachi
2014/1/9 Flavio Percoco :
> On 08/01/14 17:13 -0800, Nachi Ueno wrote:
would this new service give us that existing, proven,
> configuration management tools like chef and puppet don't have?
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> Hi Flavio
>>
>> Thank you for your input.
>> I agree with you. oslo.config isn&#x
information in the environment rather than in roles). I
> assume Puppet offers the same. Please don't re-invent this hugely
> complicated wheel.
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 10:23 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>>>
Hi Doug
2014/1/9 Doug Hellmann :
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks
>>
>> Thank you for your input.
>>
>> The key difference from external configuration system (Chef, puppet
>> etc) is integration wi
Hi Doug
Thank you for your input.
2014/1/9 Doug Hellmann :
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> Hi Doug
>>
>> 2014/1/9 Doug Hellmann :
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Nach
n point for me, and it's get more worse
if the env is heterogeneous.
I have also some experience to run openstack clusters, but it is still
pain for me..
My experience is something like this
# Wow, new release! ohh this chef repo didn't supported..
# hmm i should modify chef recipe.. hmm debug..
Hi Bob
2014/1/9 Robert Kukura :
> On 01/09/2014 02:34 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> Hi Doug
>>
>> 2014/1/9 Doug Hellmann :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi folks
>>>
Hi Jay
2014/1/9 Jay Pipes :
> Hope you don't mind, I'll jump in here :)
I'll never mind to discuss with you :)
> On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 11:08 -0800, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> Hi Jeremy
>>
>> Don't you think it is burden for operators if we should choose c
Hi Oleg
2014/1/9 Oleg Gelbukh :
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> 2014/1/9 Jeremy Hanmer :
>>
>> > How do you see these interactions defined? For instance, if I deploy
>> > a custom driver for Neutron, does that mean I also hav
2014/1/9 Doug Hellmann :
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> Hi Oleg
>>
>> 2014/1/9 Oleg Gelbukh :
>> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> >>
>> >> 2014/1/9 Jeremy Hanmer :
>&
01-09 at 23:56 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
>> > > > On Thu, Jan 09 2014, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hope you don't mind, I'll jump in here :)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 11:08 -0800
> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2014-01-09 12:21:05 -0700:
>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> > Hi folks
>> >
>> > Thank you for your input.
>> >
>> > The key difference from external configuration s
+1 but fixing this looks like take not small time
2014/1/10 Maru Newby :
> I recently saw a case [1] where a misspelled assertion method
> (asoptt_called_once_with vs assert_called_once_with) did not result in a test
> failure because the object it was called on was created by mock.patch()
> wi
Hi Clint
2014/1/10 Clint Byrum :
> Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-01-10 13:42:30 -0700:
>> Hi Flavio, Clint
>>
>> I agree with you guys.
>> sorry, may be, I wasn't clear. My opinion is to remove every
>> configuration in the node,
>> and every configuration should be done by API from c
Hi Anita
Location: I am about to sign the contract for Salle du Parc at 3625 Parc
> avenue, a room in a residence of McGill University.
^^^ Let's me confirmed the room number?
2014/1/7 Anita Kuno :
> On 01/08/2014 03:10 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> Hi Anita
>>
>> Le
Hi folks
I get Embrane CI comment in my review about 10 times in min.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58897/
Embrane CI looks like broken, and we should stop it now.
Best
Nachi
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://l
2014/1/13 Clint Byrum :
> Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-01-13 10:35:07 -0800:
>> Hi Clint
>>
>> 2014/1/10 Clint Byrum :
>> > Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-01-10 13:42:30 -0700:
>> >> Hi Flavio, Clint
>> >>
>> >> I agree with you guys.
>> >> sorry, may be, I wasn't clear. M
Hi Russell
Thanks. I got it
2014/1/13 Russell Bryant :
> On 01/13/2014 05:26 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> Hi folks
>>
>> I get Embrane CI comment in my review about 10 times in min.
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58897/
>>
>> Embrane CI looks like broken
Hi folks
Security group for OVS agent (ovs plugin or ML2) is being broken.
so we need vif_security port binding to fix this
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/21946/)
We got discussed about the architecture for ML2 on ML2 weekly meetings, and
I wanna continue discussion in here.
Here is my propos
, but those values may need to depend on the value of
> enable_security_group from proposal 1.
>
> -Bob
>
>> Once OVSfirewallDriver will be available, the firewall drivers that
>> the operator wants to use should be in a MD config file/section and
>> ovs MD could bind
nfiguration, then update vif_security based on
this value.
> Thanks,
>
> Amir
>
>
> On Jan 16, 2014, at 11:42 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>
>> Hi Mathieu, Bob
>>
>> Thank you for your reply
>> OK let's do (A) - (C) for now.
>>
>> (A) Re
Hi Bob, Kyle
I pushed (A) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/67281/.
so could you review it?
2014/1/16 Robert Kukura :
> On 01/16/2014 03:13 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 16, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Amir
>>>
>>> 2014/1/
Thanks! Kyle
2014/1/16 Kyle Mestery :
> On Jan 16, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>
>> Hi Bob, Kyle
>>
>> I pushed (A) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/67281/.
>> so could you review it?
>>
> Just did, looks good Nachi, thanks!
>
>> 2014/1/16
Hi Rajesh
May I ask why we need single line representation of PEM format?
For CLI, we will use file_name as same as nova keypair-add.
We won't specify PEM on the URL.
2014-01-27 Rajesh Mohan :
> Thanks John.
>
> My initial approach is similar to Keystone's. This is mainly to unblock me
> from
ad String in the
> database, I assumed we need to give string as input.
>
> I guess, the neutron client will convert the file to string and then call
> the API. That should work. Thanks for the clarification.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
+1
2014年2月12日水曜日、Mayur Patilさんは書きました:
> +1
>
> *--*
> *Cheers,*
> *Mayur*
>
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Hi Paul
Sorry, I have missed this mail.
The reason for putting -1 was the gating issue, so it is OK now.
PS
Thank you for your rebasing this one
2014-02-16 16:43 GMT-08:00 Sumit Naiksatam :
> Hi Paul,
>
> Our plan with FWaaS was to get it to parity with LBaaS as far as STF
> is concerned. That w
Hi Neutron core's
We should wait approving code due to bug 1280035.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1280035
Unittest fails very high rate in the gating and blocks gating queue.
Salvatore is working on the issue.
At first, we skip the failing unit test.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/73
Hi folks
Good news. 74882 is merged.
I'm still not sure the current UT failure rate yet with 1280035,
so I think we should wait to see the failure rate.
so please check current gating status when you approve codes.
Best
Nachi
2014-02-19 16:59 GMT-08:00 Nachi Ueno :
> Hi Neutron core&
Hi folks
I wrote an bookmarklet for neutron gerrit review.
This bookmarklet make the comment title for 3rd party ci as gray.
javascript:(function(){list =
document.querySelectorAll('td.GJEA35ODGC'); for(i in
list){if(!list[i].innerHTML){continue;};if(list[i].innerHTML &&
list[i].innerHTML.search(
./run_test.sh or ./run_test.sh -d package_name is working?
2014-03-03 21:28 GMT-08:00 Paul Michali :
> Hi,
>
> I'm stuck and can use some guidance here...please!
>
> I have a change set out for review that used the VPN Service Type Framework
> ( https://review.openstack.org/74144). Everything work
Hi Zang
Thank you for your contribution on this!
The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit.
[1] We are depending DB security, anyway
When we get stolen the private key in the DB, it means we are also
stolen ID/PW for DB.
If we stolen the key, even if we keep the private k
Hi Kyle
2014-04-29 10:52 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery :
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> Hi Zang
>>
>> Thank you for your contribution on this!
>> The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit.
>>
> Has the idea of
of 2014-04-29 10:58:53 -0700:
>> Hi Kyle
>>
>> 2014-04-29 10:52 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery :
>> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> >> Hi Zang
>> >>
>> >> Thank you for your contribution on this!
>> >> The p
> Jarret
Thanks!
Currently, the config will be generated on demand by the agent.
What's merit storing entire config in the Barbican?
> Kyle
Thanks!
2014-04-30 7:05 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery :
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> Hi Clint
>>
>&g
ig file. If the config files are generated and
> can be stored, then storing the whole config file in Barbican protects the
> private key (and any other settings) without having to try to deliver the
> key to the OpenVPN endpoint in some non-standard way.
>
>
> Jarret
>
> On 4/
ican, start the OpenVPN process and
> then purge the key? It would of course still be resident in the memory
> of the OpenVPN process but should otherwise be protected against
> filesystem disk-residency issues.
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Nachi Ueno [mailto
u treat the key as largely
>> > ephemeral, pull it down from Barbican, start the OpenVPN process and
>> > then purge the key? It would of course still be resident in the memory
>> > of the OpenVPN process but should otherwise be protected against
>> > filesys
enVPN process download key to memory
>> >> directly from Babican?
>> >>
>> >> 2014-05-01 9:42 GMT-07:00 Clark, Robert Graham :
>> >> > Excuse me interrupting but couldn't you treat the key as largely
>> >> > ephemeral, pull it down f
Hi Barbican folks
I'm trying to rewrite existing ssl-vpn bp with integration with barbican.
so I'm really appliciate if I can get your input.
In original proposal, we have vpn credential resource who has followings
- id
- ca (PEM encoded)
- server_certificate (PEM encoded)
- server_key (PEM enco
Hi folks
As per neutron discussion, we agreed there is really important to distribute
core-reviewer loads.
so we got an idea to specify primary/secondary reviewers for each reviews.
IMO, this is almost impossible without some helper tool.
so, I wrote it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouS5h5
ntribution/neutron/30
>
> Best regards,
> Boris Pavlovic
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks
>>
>> As per neutron discussion, we agreed there is really important to
>> distribute
>> core-review
Hi folks
I could deploy it on openshift
http://reviewstat-nachi.rhcloud.com/
2014-05-19 20:36 GMT-07:00 Nachi Ueno :
> Hi Boris
>
> Ya, I know this stats.
> The primary usecase for this patch is helping reviewer assignment for
> each patch.
>
> 2014-05-19 18:50 GMT-07:00 B
+1!
Carl is doing great contribution for the community.
He is really active on reviews with very high quality comments.
His input based on large scale deployment is also very valuable for
the community.
2014-05-21 13:59 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery :
> I would like to propose a few changes to the Neut
Hi Salvatore
Thank you for your posting this.
IMO, this topic shouldn't be limited for Neutron only.
Users wants consistent API between OpenStack project, right?
In Nova, a server has task_state, so Neutron should do same way.
2014-05-22 15:34 GMT-07:00 Salvatore Orlando :
> As most of you pr
Hi folks
I believed we should link bug or bp for any commit except automated
commit by infra.
However, I found also there is no written policy for this.
so may be, I'm wrong for here.
The reason, we need bug or bp linked , is
(1) Triage for core reviewing
(2) Avoid duplication of works
(3) Relea
at 4:02 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi folks
>>>
>>> I believed we should link bug or bp for any commit except automated
>>> commit by infra.
>>> However, I
comment for
requesting bug report.
Best
Nachi
2014-05-27 16:54 GMT-07:00 Joe Gordon :
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ben, Joe
>>
>> Thank you for your reply
>>
>> (2) Avoid duplication of works
>> I have s
Hi Zang
Since, SSL-VPN for Juno bp is approved in neturon-spec,
I would like to restart this work.
Could you share your code if it is possible?
Also, Let's discuss how we can collaborate in here.
Best
Nachi
2014-05-01 14:40 GMT-07:00 Nachi Ueno :
> Hi folks
>
>> Clint
>
I like the idea
2014-05-29 8:33 GMT-07:00 Yuriy Taraday :
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>>
>>> (2) Avoid duplication of works
>>> I have several experience of this. Anywa
Hi folks
Today, we are can change allow overlapping ips or not by configuration.
This has impact of database design, and actually, this flag complicate the
implementations.
Whey we have this flag is a historical reason. This was needed when many OS
don't support namespaces, however Most of OS sup
Hi folks
ExaBGP won't suit for BGPVPN implementation because it isn't support vpnv4.
Ryu is supporting it, however they have no internal api to binding
neutron network & route target.
so I think contrail is a only solution for BGPVPN implementation now.
2014-05-30 2:22 GMT-07:00 Mathieu Rohon
> Yamamoto
Cool! OK, I'll make ryu based bgpspeaker as ref impl for my bp.
>Yong
Ya, we have already decided to have the driver architecture.
IMO, this discussion is for reference impl.
2014-06-05 0:24 GMT-07:00 Yongsheng Gong :
> I think maybe we can device a kind of framework so that we can plu
Hi Paul
I think this flavor bp is related.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90070/
By using flavor, you can specify the flavor for routers ( high
bandwidth or low bandwidth ) such as VM (vCPU vMemory etc).
I don't see any bp for flavor based scheduling yet, but IMO it is
great we could have such s
Hi Nova, Neturon Team
I would like to discuss issue of Neutron + Nova + OVS security group fix.
We have a discussion in IRC today, but the issue is complicated so we will have
a conf call tomorrow 17:00 UST (10AM PDT). #openstack-neutron
(I'll put conf call information in IRC)
<-- Please let me k
Hi Salvatore
2014-03-25 17:57 GMT-07:00 Salvatore Orlando :
> I hope we can sort this out on the mailing list IRC, without having to
> schedule emergency meetings.
Russel requested to have a conf call on this, so let him decide it.
> Salvatore
>
> On 25 March 2014 22:58, Na
Hi Zane
Thank you for your very valuable post.
We should convert your suggest to multiple bps.
2014-04-07 17:28 GMT-07:00 Zane Bitter :
> The Neutron API is a constant cause of pain for us as Heat developers, but
> afaik we've never attempted to bring up the issues we have found in a
> cross-proj
Hi Jarda
Congratulations
This release and the demo is super awesome!!
Do you have any instruction to install this one?
2014-04-10 1:32 GMT-07:00 Jaromir Coufal :
> Dear Stackers,
>
> I am happy to announce that yesterday Tuskar UI (TripleO UI) has tagged
> branch 0.1.0 for Icehouse release [0]
Hi Julio
Unfortunately, we couldn't get forward about VPNaaS much in Icehouse.
We will discuss this design in next summit, so let's get this progress in
Juno.
2014-04-10 10:51 GMT-07:00 Julio Carlos Barrera Juez <
juliocarlos.barr...@i2cat.net>:
> Hi.
>
> After 8 months of the patch creation a
Hi Thomas
Great! Do we have a doc how to use these packages?
2014-04-11 0:00 GMT-07:00 Thomas Goirand :
> Hi,
>
> it's with a great joy that I can announce today, that TripleO is now
> fully in Debian [1]. It is currently only uploaded to Debian
> experimental, like for all Icehouse (I don't thi
+10 !
2014-04-15 15:07 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery :
> Given the success the Nova team has had in handling reviews using
> their new nova-specs gerrit repository, I think it makes a lot of
> sense for Neutron to do the same. With this in mind, I've added
> instructions to the BP wiki [1] for how to
Hi folks
I don't think to use ASCII digrams is good idea because it is hard to
maintenance & update
diagrams..
so I would like to recommend Blockdiag & Netdiag which are plugins for sphinx.
Blockdiag
http://blockdiag.com/en/blockdiag/
blockdiag {
A -> B -> C -> D;
A -> E -> F -> G;
}
wil
Hi folks
I submitted a wip patch which has diagram examples for both of ascii
flow and blockdiag.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88095/1
This is both output from ascii flow and blockdiag.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/File:Screenshot.png
I faced two issue in ascii flow. May be, I'm missing
Hi folks
My bad,, Issue (1) was my mistake, and fixed
2014-04-16 15:16 GMT-07:00 Nachi Ueno :
> Hi folks
>
> I submitted a wip patch which has diagram examples for both of ascii
> flow and blockdiag.
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88095/1
>
> This is both ou
Hi folks
I'm +1 for "Review Hour" on IRC because it shorten communication round
trip time.
As Akihiro said, it won't solve everything, but we can improve it
Best
Nachi
2014-04-21 9:20 GMT-07:00 Akihiro Motoki :
> Hi,
>
> Previously Neutron team had ReviewDays [1] and core members made themselv
Hi folks
Thank you for your starting this topic.
Let me share some of my ideas
(1) Improve security_group_rules_for_devices
In current implementation, we are generating rules per port in server side.
It is something like this.
port1[SG_Rule1, SG_Rule2, SG_Rule3] .. port2, port3
This can be imp
QQ: do you have __init__.py in the directory?
2014-07-16 11:43 GMT-07:00 Julio Carlos Barrera Juez <
juliocarlos.barr...@i2cat.net>:
> I am fighting with this for months. I want to develop a VPN Neutron
> plugin, but it is almost impossible to realize how to achieve it. this is a
> thread I open
Hi nova folks
QQ: Who uses migrate_instance_start/finish, and why we need this rpc call?
I greped code but I couldn't find implementation for it.
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/372c54927ab4f6c226f5a1a2aead40b89617cf77/nova/network/manager.py#L1683
Best
Nachi
___
Hi Russell
Thanks. I got it.
2014-07-22 14:21 GMT-07:00 Russell Bryant :
> On 07/21/2014 04:10 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> Hi nova folks
>>
>> QQ: Who uses migrate_instance_start/finish, and why we need this rpc call?
>>
>> I greped code but I couldn't f
Hi folks
I think this thread is still mixing topics. I feel we can archive 1000 mails :P
so let me name it and let me write my thought on this.
[Topic1] Nova parity priority
I do understand concern and this is highest priority.
However, group based policy effort won't slower this effort.
Bec
Hi Folks
Is anyone interested in Kibana + ElasticSearch Integration with ceilometer?
# Note: This discussion is not for Havana.
I have registered BP. (for IceHouse)
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/elasticsearch-driver
This is demo video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SmA0W0hd
look that project.
Best
Nachi
2013/9/13 Monsyne Dragon :
> Nice! Have you chatted with these folks: http://projectmeniscus.org/ ?
> (Openstack-related logging-as-a-service project)
> They list interoperation with Ceilometer as a project goal.
>
> On 9/12/13 7:06 PM, "Nachi Uen
>
> Great to here this!
>
> Although I have to think this integration more from now, for log aggregator,
> using logstash might be good idea here.
>
> I will keep following up on this. :)
>
> Jaesuk Ahn, Ph.D.
> Team Lead, Cloud Platform Dev.
> KT
>
>
&
Hi Julien
Thank you for your comment
2013/9/16 Julien Danjou :
> On Fri, Sep 13 2013, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>
> Hi Nachi,
>
> That looks like a good idea, thanks for submitting.
>
>> [1] We should add elastic search query api for ceilometer? or we
>> should let user ki
Hi Neutron VPNaaS folks
In havana, IPsec site-to-site model and reference driver is merged.
Let's discuss next step! :P
I have created a page for this discussion.
so could you add your bp or thought or workitem on this etherpad page.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/NeutronVPNaaSIceHouse
I have a
Congrat!
2013/10/1 Kyle Mestery (kmestery) :
> Folks:
>
> Just an update regarding the change to move devstack to default
> to the ML2 Neutron plugin instead of the OVS plugin. The patch [1]
> merged yesterday. Full tempest tests were passed with this, but
> just a heads up for those using devstac
Hi Rudra
Two comment from me
(1) IPAM and Network policy extension looks like independent extension.
so IPAM part and Network policy should be divided for two blueprints.
(2) The team IPAM is too general word. IMO we should use more specific word.
How about SubnetGroup?
(3) Network Policy Resou
Hi Rudra
inline responded
2013/10/4 Rudra Rugge :
> Hi Nachi,
>
> Thanks for reviewing the BP. Please see inline:
>
> On 10/4/13 11:30 AM, "Nachi Ueno" wrote:
>
>>Hi Rudra
>>
>>Two comment from me
>>
>>(1) IPAM and Network policy exte
2013/10/4 Rudra Rugge :
> Hi Nachi,
>
> Inline response
>
> On 10/4/13 12:54 PM, "Nachi Ueno" wrote:
>
>>Hi Rudra
>>
>>inline responded
>>
>>2013/10/4 Rudra Rugge :
>>> Hi Nachi,
>>>
>>> Thanks for reviewing th
+1
2013/10/8 Monty Taylor :
> Hey!
>
> Got a question on IRC which seemed fair game for a quick mailing list post:
>
> Q: I see both addCleanup and tearDown in nova's test suite - which one
> should I use for new code?
>
> A: addCleanup
>
> All new code should 100% of the time use addCleanup and n
omments:
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprint-policy-extensions-for-neutron
>
> Thanks,
> Rudra
>
> On Oct 4, 2013, at 4:56 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>
>> 2013/10/4 Rudra Rugge :
>>> Hi Nachi,
>>>
>>> Inline response
>>>
>>
Hi Rudra
ExtraRoute bp was designed for adding some "extra" routing for the router.
The spec is very handy for simple and small use cases.
However it won't fit large use cases, because it takes all route in a Json List.
# It means we need to send full route for updating.
As Salvatore suggests, we
Hi Rudra
2013/10/8 Rudra Rugge :
> Hi Nachi,
>
> Please see inline:
>
> On Oct 8, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>
>> Hi Rudra
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Some questions and comments
>>
>> - name and fq_name
>> How we us
Hi Paul
2013/10/11 Paul Michali :
> Hi folks,
>
> I have a bunch of questions for you on VPNaaS in specific, and services in
> general...
>
> Nachi,
>
> 1) You hd a bug fix to do service provider framework support for VPN
> (41827). It was held for Icehouse. Is that pretty much a working patch?
>
2013/10/11 Paul Michali :
> Added several more questions inline…
>
>
> PCM (Paul Michali)
>
> MAIL p...@cisco.com
> IRC pcm_ (irc.freenode.net)
> TW @pmichali
>
> On Oct 11, 2013, at 3:28 PM, Paul Michali wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have a bunch of questions for you on VPNaaS in specific, and
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
