Hi Clint Thank you for your suggestion. Your point get taken :)
> Kyle This is also a same discussion for LBaaS Can we discuss this in advanced service meeting? > Zang Could you join the discussion? 2014-04-29 15:48 GMT-07:00 Clint Byrum <cl...@fewbar.com>: > Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-04-29 10:58:53 -0700: >> Hi Kyle >> >> 2014-04-29 10:52 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery <mest...@noironetworks.com>: >> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno <na...@ntti3.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Zang >> >> >> >> Thank you for your contribution on this! >> >> The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit. >> >> >> > Has the idea of using Barbican been discussed before? There are many >> > reasons why using Barbican for this may be better than developing key >> > management ourselves. >> >> No, however I'm +1 for using Barbican. Let's discuss this in >> certificate management topic in advanced service session. >> > > Just a suggestion: Don't defer that until the summit. Sounds like you've > already got some consensus, so you don't need the summit just to rubber > stamp it. I suggest discussing as much as you can right now on the mailing > list, and using the time at the summit to resolve any complicated issues > including any "a or b" things that need crowd-sourced idea making. You > can also use the summit time to communicate your requirements to the > Barbican developers. > > Point is: just because you'll have face time, doesn't mean you should > use it for what can be done via the mailing list. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
