Hi friends,
The two devstack patches mentioned below have had the latest patchset up for a
week now, and still only have one +2 on them. The other patches (and the
ultimate goal of getting CI running on this driver) are blocked these patches.
Could a devstack core please review these soon? Than
On August 28, 2014 8:58:11 AM PDT, Clint Byrum wrote:
>Excerpts from Jyoti Ranjan's message of 2014-08-27 21:20:19 -0700:
>> I do agree but it create an extra requirement for Undercloud if we
>high
>> availability is important criteria. Because of this, undercloud has
>to be
>> there 24x7, 365 d
On September 2, 2014 9:28:15 PM PDT, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Good to know we will have Ironic support. I can help the integration.
>
>Let me clarify the situation as Horizon core team. I wonder why it is
>ASAP.
>Horizon is released with integrated projects and it is true in Juno
>release
>
On September 11, 2014 3:52:59 AM PDT, Lucas Alvares Gomes
wrote:
>Oh, it's because Precise doesn't have the docker.io package[1] (nor
>"docker").
>
>AFAIK the -infra team is now using Trusty in gate, so it won't be a
>problem. But if you think that we should still support Ironic DevStack
>with
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:44:24PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote:
> All,
>
> Starting this thread as a follow-up to a strongly negative reaction by the
> Ironic PTL to my patches[1] adding initial Heat->Ironic integration, and
> subsequent very detailed justification and discussion of why they may be
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:09:36AM +, Carlino, Chuck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Below is the beginning of a spec I'd like to get into Kilo. Before
> going into detail, it occurred to me that a basic decision needs to be
> made, so I'd like to get thoughts on the api Alternatives mentioned below.
>
> T
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 01:00:04AM +, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed in Paris and at today's IRC meeting [1] we are going to be
> alternating the time of the weekly IRC meetings to accommodate our
> contributors in EMEA better. No time will be perfect for everyone, bu
Hi all,
Ironic has decided to email a weekly status report for all subteams.
This is the inaugural issue of that. :)
This is and will be a copy and paste from the Ironic whiteboard.[0]
Testing (adam_g)
(deva)
- make Ironic voting -- needs to be rebased again, but has been approved
Bugs (dta
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 08:02:56AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
> When at Summit I discovered that check-tempest-dsvm-ironic-pxe_ssh is
> now voting on Nova check queue. The reasons given is that the Nova team
> ignored the interface contract that was being provided to Ironic, broke
> them, so the Iron
Hi all,
Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled
directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted.
Testing (adam_g)
- Nova stable merges are being bit by a race in the sideways grenade job:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1398128 /
https://review.op
On December 8, 2014 2:23:58 PM PST, Devananda van der Veen
wrote:
>I'd like to raise this topic for a wider discussion outside of the
>hallway
>track and code reviews, where it has thus far mostly remained.
>
>In previous discussions, my understanding has been that the Fuel team
>sought to use
c tool for
> > provisioning. It is not bound to Fuel or Mirantis and if it will cause
> > confusion in the future we will even be happy to give it a different and
> > less confusing name.
> >
> > P. P. S.
> > Some of the points of this integration do not look g
Hi all,
Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled
directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted.
Testing (adam_g)
Bugs (dtantsur)
(as of Mon, 8 Dec 17:00 UTC)
Open: 108 (+6). 5 new (+1), 26 in progress (+1),
0 critical, 12 high (+2) and 3 incomplete
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:45:57PM +, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> I'm sending the details of the midcycle in a separate email. Before you
> reply that you won't be able to make it, I'd like to share some thoughts /
> concerns.
>
> In the last few weeks, several people who I previously thou
Hi all,
Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled
directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. I'm going to start
keeping this trimmed down to just the new stuff.
Drivers
iRMC (naohirot)
[power driver] needs code review towords kilo-2:
https://revie
Hi all,
Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled
directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted.
Bugs (dtantsur)
(As of Mon, 12 Jan, 12:00 UTC)
Open: 133 (+15). 14 new (+5), 32 in progress (+3), 1 critical (+1),
13 high (+2) and 5 incom
Hi all,
Devananda proposed having a second Ironic midcycle meetup a few weeks
ago.[0] Well, it's happening. :)
To be clear, this is a developer-focused code sprint, *not* a planning
meeting. We want to land code, not write specs or plan roadmaps.
The meetup will be February 11-13 at Rackspace SF
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:28:08AM -0800, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Devananda proposed having a second Ironic midcycle meetup a few weeks
> ago.[0] Well, it's happening. :)
>
Oops, forgot my link here:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 07:28:46PM +0530, Ramakrishnan G wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This is regarding the RAID configuration spec that was posted for review
> some time back:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/135899/
>
> This review consists of a generic RAID interface currently proposed jointly
> by
Hi all,
Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled
directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted.
Bugs (dtantsur)
(As of Mon, 19 Jan, 11:00 UTC)
Open: 122 (-11). 4 new (-10), 31 in progress (-1), 0 critical (-1),
14 high (+1) and 6 incom
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 06:41:50AM -0800, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled
> directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted.
>
> Bugs (dtantsur)
> (As of Mon, 19 Jan, 11:00 UTC)
> Ope
Hi François,
You can hit the Ironic nodes API and filter by instance_uuid. Something like:
curl http://ironic:6385/v1/nodes?instance_uuid=blablabla
Hope that helps.
// jim
On May 6, 2014 at 2:28:30 AM, François Rossigneux
(francois.rossign...@inria.fr) wrote:
Hi all,
I need to retrieve the
On April 4, 2014 at 9:12:56 AM, Devananda van der Veen
(devananda@gmail.com) wrote:
Ironic's responsibility ends where the host OS begins. Ironic is a bare metal
provisioning service, not a configuration management service.
+1
// jim
___
OpenStack
Guys, thank you very much for your comments,
I thought a lot about why we need to be so limited in IPA use cases. Now it
much clearer for me. Indeed, having some kind of agent running inside host OS
is not what many people want to see. And now I'd rather agree with that.
But there are still so
Hi all,
As Deva requested, our team put up a merge request for the IPA driver
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84795/) as soon as Juno opened. We’ve
continued to update this patch and iterate on the agent model. We are doing our
best not to get too far ahead of master, but we also want to get
Hi folks! Deva and I talked a bit more about the agent driver last night, and I
wanted to give everyone a quick status update on where we stand with merging
the agent driver into Ironic itself.
First off, we’ve taken all of the agent driver patches we had and squashed them
into the main agent p
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 01:14:13PM +, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
> Hi Ironickers,
>
> I was thinking this weekend: All the cool projects does have a mascot
> so I thought that we could have one for Ironic too.
>
> The idea about what the mascot would be was easy because the RAX guys
> put "be
Unclear if I get a vote, but if so, +1 it is. :)
On July 11, 2014 4:18:55 PM PDT, Chris K wrote:
>another +1 from /me.
>
>
>On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Devananda van der Veen <
>devananda@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all!
>>
>> While David (Shrews) only began working on Ironic in earnest fo
On August 7, 2014 at 8:36:16 AM, Matt Wagner (matt.wag...@redhat.com) wrote:
On 07/08/14 14:17 +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
>2. We'll need to speed up spec reviews, because we're adding one more
>blocker on the way to the code being merged :) Maybe it's no longer a
>problem actually, we're doi
Hi all,
We're excited to announce the release of Ironic 4.2.1. This is a patch
release in the OpenStack Liberty series.
This release imports Japanese translations as our first translated
language, and also fixes some bugs around running on systems with the
Japanese locale.
Release notes can be f
BadCub and I have been working to find a venue that can host that many
people, and haven't had any luck at all. :(
I think we'll need to skip a formal team dinner this time, sorry folks.
I'd still love to do something informal on Thursday night with some of
you - we can work it out next week.
//
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 04:50:04PM +0100, Beth Elwell wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> I have replied inline to your comments below:
>
> On 19/10/2015 19:38, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 07:05:04PM +0100, Beth Elwell wrote:
> >>Hi all,
> >>
>
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 03:30:05PM -0700, Wan-yen Hsu wrote:
> As mentioned in the weekly IRC, 3rd-party vendor drivers are ranked lower
> priority and therefore their code tend to merge at the late cycle of a
> release. Therefore, it leads little time for driver author to submit
> document and
Hi folks,
Since we'll all be at the summit next week, and presumably recovering
the following week, the next Ironic meeting will be on November 9, in
the usual place and time. See you there! :)
// jim
__
OpenStack Developmen
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 02:24:08PM -0700, Wan-yen Hsu wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
>My techtalk is supposed to finish by 2:45pm. However, techtalk schedule
> is not as well monitored as formal sessions so it could get delayed.
> That's why I was exploring whether the group management session can be
>
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:48:07AM -0700, Wan-yen Hsu wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> I have asked techtalk coordinator to switch my techtalk session time so
> there is no need to change group management session schedule. You can keep
> it at 2:50pm Wed.. Thanks!
Okay, I've now moved these back to the o
Hi friends,
I wrote a recap of the summit (from my perspective) that some of you may
find interesting. Feedback is very welcome. :)
http://words.jimrollenhagen.com/mitaka-summit-recap/
// jim
__
OpenStack Development Mailin
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 08:44:36AM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 11/03/2015 11:40 PM, Gabriel Bezerra wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >The change in https://review.openstack.org/237122 touches a feature from
> >ironic that has not been released in any tag yet.
> >
> >At first, we from the team who has written t
Hi folks,
I posted a review to add our Mitaka priorities to our specs repo:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/241223/
Ruby made a good point that not everyone was at the summit and she'd
like buyoff on the patch from all cores before we land it. I tend to
agree, so I ask that cores that were not i
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 04:08:18PM -0300, Gabriel Bezerra wrote:
> Em 04.11.2015 11:32, Jim Rollenhagen escreveu:
> >On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 08:44:36AM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
> >On 11/03/2015 11:40 PM, Gabriel Bezerra wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>The cha
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 02:55:49PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 02:42 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 04:08:18PM -0300, Gabriel Bezerra wrote:
> >> Em 04.11.2015 11:32, Jim Rollenhagen escreveu:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 08:
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 12:19:37PM -0800, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
[snip]
> Yeah, no worries there. So you're good with unreleased changes just
> being 3 months, no cycle boundaries? If so, I'll push up a change to the
> governance repo for that.
That change is here: https://r
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 11:55:50AM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 04:21 PM, Shraddha Pandhe wrote:
> >Hi Salvatore,
> >
> >Thanks for the feedback. I agree with you that arbitrary JSON blobs will
> >make IPAM much more powerful. Some other projects already do things like
> >this.
>
> :( A
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:16:34PM -0500, Ruby Loo wrote:
> On 10 November 2015 at 12:08, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
>
> > On 11/10/2015 05:45 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> In the last Ironic meeting [1] we started a discussion about whether
> >> we need to have a mid-cycle mee
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:38:28PM +, Sean M. Collins wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:47:13PM EST, Vasyl Saienko wrote:
> > [0] https://github.com/jumpojoy/neutron
>
> The way you created the repository in GitHub, it is impossible to diff
> it against master to see what you did.
>
> https
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:19:08PM +, Sam Betts (sambetts) wrote:
> So you would end up with a set of commands that look like this:
After reading through this thread, I think this is mostly good, other
than some word choices. I've changed a few inline to feel more natural
(IMHO of course). :)
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:05:54AM -0800, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:16:34PM -0500, Ruby Loo wrote:
> > On 10 November 2015 at 12:08, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> >
> > > On 11/10/2015 05:45 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
> > >
> >
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 04:35:24PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19 2015, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> > In my mind the “independent” release model was originally meant to mean that
> > the project was completely on their own, doing potentially incorrect and
> > random
> > releases. It wa
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:05:54AM -0800, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
>
> Another idea I floated last week was to do a virtual midcycle of sorts.
> Treat it like a normal midcycle in that everyone tells their management
> "I'm out for 3-4 days for the midcycle", but they
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:35:58PM -0800, Shraddha Pandhe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know how everyone is using maintenance mode and what is
> expected from admins about nodes in maintenance. The reason I am bringing
> up this topic is because, most of the ironic operations, including manual
Hi all,
We're approaching OpenStack's M-1 milestone, and as we have lots of good
stuff in the master branch, and no Mitaka release yet, I'd like to make
a release next Thursday, December 3.
First, I've caught us up (best I can tell) on missing release notes
since our last release. Please do revie
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 03:58:01PM +, Derek Higgins wrote:
> >
> >Ah, I think all we have here is a terminology mismatch around "non voting"
> >vs "non gating".
> >
> >AFAIK what is being proposed is to reinstate the TripleO jobs so they *do*
> >vote on any change (+1/-1), but they do not blo
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:48:44PM -0500, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 11/30/2015 12:33 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> > I was there and I already said that I'm not buying into "spamming the
> > list" argument. There are much less important things that I see here
> > right now, even though I do actively use
> On Dec 3, 2015, at 12:06, Sean Dague wrote:
>
> For folks that don't know, we've got an effort under way to look at some
> of what's happened with the service catalogue, how it's organically grown,
> and do some pruning and tuning to make sure it's going to support what
> we want to do with Op
Sorry I dropped the ball on this thread. :(
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:51:52AM -0800, Shraddha Pandhe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Jim Rollenhagen
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:35:58PM -0800, Shraddha Pandhe wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> &
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 05:38:43PM +0100, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As you all probably know, we've switched to reno for managing release notes.
> What it also means is that the release team has stopped managing milestones
> for us. We have to manually open/close milestones in launchpad, if
Hi Ironickers,
We decided in our last meeting that the midcycle for Newton will again
be virtual. Now, we need to choose a date. Please indicate which options
work for you (more than one may be selected):
http://doodle.com/poll/gpug7ynd9fn4rdfe
I'll close this poll two Mondays from now, May 30.
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 01:21:35PM -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> On 05/16/2016 07:14 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
> > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Loo, Ruby wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> A patch to ironic-lib made me wonder about what is our supported usage of
> >> ironic-lib. Or even t
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 02:02:32PM +, Loo, Ruby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it would be good if we came up with some general guidelines wrt the
> processes by which decisions are made. By ³decisions², I mean decisions that
> we, as a community, will try to abide by ?
>
> I have noticed in the
Hi team,
There's a US holiday next Monday (May 30) and as such I'm cancelling the
corresponding weekly ironic meeting.
See you all the following week.
// jim
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
U
Hi,
There's rumors floating around about Neutron having a bonding model in
the near future. Are there any solid plans for that?
For context, as part of the multitenant networking work, ironic has a
portgroup concept proposed, where operators can configure bonding for
NICs in a baremetal machine.
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 01:58:18PM +0900, Yuiko Takada wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Hironori, Lucas, thank you for bringing this topic up!
>
> Yes, as Lucas says, our latest spec is
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/319505
>
> I and Tien, Hironori, Akira discussed and merged our idea.
>
> And new Nova sp
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:18:40PM -0700, Armando M. wrote:
> On 24 May 2016 at 04:51, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > There's rumors floating around about Neutron having a bonding model in
> > the near future. Are there any solid plans for that
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 07:27:09AM -0400, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 01:58:18PM +0900, Yuiko Takada wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Hironori, Lucas, thank you for bringing this topic up!
> >
> > Yes, as Lucas says, our latest spec is
> >
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 09:25:18AM -0400, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> Hi Ironickers,
>
> We decided in our last meeting that the midcycle for Newton will again
> be virtual. Now, we need to choose a date. Please indicate which options
> work for you (more than one may be selec
Hey all,
Myself and some other cores have had trouble tracking our priorities
using Launchpad and friends, so we put together a Trello board to help
us track it. This should also help us focus on what to review or work
on.
https://trello.com/b/ROTxmGIc/ironic-newton-priorities
Some notes on this
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 06:29:13PM +0200, Alexis Monville wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Jim Rollenhagen
> wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Myself and some other cores have had trouble tracking our priorities
> > using Launchpad and friends,
By the way, I created an etherpad for the midcycle to start bringing in
ideas. You know what to do. :)
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-newton-midcycle
// jim
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 02:45:33PM -0400, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 09:25:18AM -0400, Jim Rollenha
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:31:35AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Clif Houck wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > At Rackspace we're running into an interesting problem: Consider a user
> > who boots an instance in Nova with an image which only supports SSH
> > public-ke
Thanks for getting to this before me, Deva. Saved me some typing. :)
A little more color inline.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 05:01:04PM -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
>
> On 06/06/2016 01:44 PM, Kris G. Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi ironic folks,
> > As I'm trying to explore how GoDaddy can use ironi
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 07:50:42PM +, Tristan Cacqueray wrote:
> On 06/03/2016 07:08 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 06:29:13PM +0200, Alexis Monville wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Jim Rol
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:10:24PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 09:37:25AM -0400, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:31:35AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Clif Houck wrote:
> &
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:39:20AM +, Sam Betts (sambetts) wrote:
>
>
> On 07/06/2016 23:59, "Kris G. Lindgren"
> mailto:klindg...@godaddy.com>> wrote:
>
> Replying to a digest so sorry for the copy and pastes
>
>
> >> There's also been discussion of ways we could do ad-hoc changes in
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:29:49AM -0700, Clark Boylan wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016, at 10:40 PM, zhangshuai wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I have a question with fixtures._fixtures.timeout.TimeoutException. like
> > following:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >
> > File
, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:10:19AM -0400, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> By the way, I created an etherpad for the midcycle to start bringing in
> ideas. You know what to do. :)
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-newton-midcycle
>
> // jim
>
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 02:4
Hi friends,
We're two patches away from having grenade passing in our check queue!
This is a huge step forward for us, many thanks go to the numerous folks
that have worked on or helped somehow with this.
I'd love to push this across the line today as it's less than 10 lines
of changes between th
> >1.)Nova<-> ironic interactions are generally seem terrible?
> I don't know if I'd call it terrible, but there's friction. Things that
> are unchangable on hardware are just software configs in vms (like mac
> addresses, overlays, etc), and things that make no sense in VMs are
> >
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 06:17:56PM +0100, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for writing it down Jim.
>
> > So, I've been thinking about this quite a bit. We've also talked about
> > doing a v2 API (as evil as that may be) in Ironic here and there. We've
> > had lots of lessons learned f
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 06:17:56PM +0100, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for writing it down Jim.
>
> > So, I've been thinking about this quite a bit. We've also talked about
> > doing a v2 API (as evil as that may be) in Ironic here and there. We've
> > had lots of lessons learned f
l help us
> land these and see it at work.
The first of these is merged, which gets us most of what we needed.
Thanks everyone for your hard work on this!
/me rechecks some things waiting for this testing :D
// jim
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Jay Faulkner
> OSIC
>
> On 6/9/16
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:35:43PM -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> On 06/10/2016 05:48 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> > On 06/10/2016 08:41 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> >> On 2016-06-10 11:49:12 +0100 (+0100), Miles Gould wrote:
> >>> On 09/06/16 23:21, Jay Faulkner wrote:
> There was some disc
Hi all,
This morning I did a quick audit of the launchpad projects for our
various projects, and found some projects that have some incorrect
permissions/ownership things. Can the current maintainers of these
projects please change the "driver" and "maintainer" fields on the home
page to "ironic-d
Hi all,
Just a reminder that our midcycle is next week!
Details are here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/VirtualSprints#Ironic_Virtual_Newton_Midcycle
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints#Future_sprints_for_Newton
Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-newton-midcycle
Please add
Hey all,
The weekly ironic meeting for June 20 will be cancelled because it
overlaps with our midcycle. Join the midcycle instead. :)
We'll resume our normal schedule on June 27.
// jim
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
Hi all,
I'd like to propose Jay Faulkner (JayF) and Sam Betts (sambetts) for the
ironic-core team.
Jay has been in the community as long as I have, has been IPA and
ironic-specs core for quite some time. His background is operations, and
he's getting good with Python. He's given great reviews for
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:23:05PM +, Jay Faulkner wrote:
> +1 lets get it voting. Feel free to add me as a reviewer to the
> project-config patch to make the change if you want me to vote officially :).
Agree. I did the thing :)
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/331422/1
// jim
>
>
> Tha
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:12:31AM -0400, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to propose Jay Faulkner (JayF) and Sam Betts (sambetts) for the
> ironic-core team.
>
> Jay has been in the community as long as I have, has been IPA and
> ironic-specs cor
Hey all,
I had an action item from the midcycle to kickstart a workgroup for the
v2 API. I've set up a meeting for that on Tuesdays at 1800 UTC in
#openstack-meeting-3:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic_v2_API
All who are interested are welcome to join.
By the way, we wouldn't min
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 04:59:09PM +0300, Senthilprabu Shanmugavel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using Ironic for deploying baremetal to my openstack environment.
> Using Liberty version on Ubuntu 14.04. I followed Ironic documentation to
> deploy x86 servers using pxe_ipmitool. Now I have a working I
> On Mar 29, 2016, at 08:39, Senthilprabu Shanmugavel
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Jim. WA did the trick. Very well explained.
>
> Should I raise a bug for fake driver's power state?.
That would be great, thanks in advance! :)
// jim
>
>> On Tue, Mar 29,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 08:33:06AM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Quick primer/refresh because of some gate/CI issues we saw last few
> days with Routes===2.3
>
> upper-constraints.txt is the current set of all the global libraries
> that should be used by all the CI jobs.
>
> This
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 03:37:53PM +0300, Vasyl Saienko wrote:
> Hello Community,
>
> I'm happy to announce that new experimental job
> 'ironic-multitenant-network' is stabilized and working. This job allows to
> test Ironic multitenancy patches at the gates with help of
> networking-generic-switc
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:43:29AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> Some more details on progress, because this is getting closer every day.
>
> There is now an api-ref target on the Nova project. The entire work in
> progress stream has been rebased into 2 patches to a top level api-ref/
> directory st
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:50:48AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 03/31/2016 09:43 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:43:29AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> >> Some more details on progress, because this is getting closer every day.
> >>
> >> T
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 11:07:40AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> We have a lot of CA file options in nova:
>
> 1. DEFAULT.ca_file - this is used in nova.crypto
> 2. ssl.ca_file - this is used when constructing glanceclient
> 3. DEFAULT.ssl_ca_file - this is used in nova.wsgi
> 4. vmware.ca_file -
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 10:13:49AM -0500, Anne Gentle wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Jim Rollenhagen
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:50:48AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> > > On 03/31/2016 09:43 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Ma
+1 from me :)
// jim
> On Apr 5, 2016, at 03:24, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to propose Anton to the ironic-inspector core reviewers team. His
> stats are pretty nice [1], he's making meaningful reviews and he's pushing
> important things (discovery, now tempest).
>
> Member
> On Apr 2, 2016, at 05:46, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Julia Kreger's message of 2016-04-01 18:21:24 -0400:
>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>>
>>> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2016-04-01 16:25:07 -0400:
Ironic/Bifrost team,
>>
>>>
I
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:02:44AM +0800, Zhenguo Niu wrote:
> Maybe we can continue the discussion here, as there's no enough time in the
> irc meeting :)
Someone mentioned this would make a good summit session, as there's a
few competing proposals that are all good options. I do welcome
discussi
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 06:36:20AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 03:26 AM, Juvonen, Tomi (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
> > Hi Nova, Ops, stackers,
> >
> > I am trying to figure out different use cases and requirements there
> > would be for host maintenance and would like to get feedback a
1 - 100 of 425 matches
Mail list logo
