On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:18:40PM -0700, Armando M. wrote: > On 24 May 2016 at 04:51, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > There's rumors floating around about Neutron having a bonding model in > > the near future. Are there any solid plans for that? > > > > Who spreads these rumors :)? > > To the best of my knowledge I have not seen any RFE proposed recently along > these lines.
Thanks Armando. Long live portgroups :) // jim > > > > For context, as part of the multitenant networking work, ironic has a > > portgroup concept proposed, where operators can configure bonding for > > NICs in a baremetal machine. There are ML2 drivers that support this > > model and will configure a bond. > > > > Some folks have concerns about landing this code if Neutron is going to > > support bonding as a first-class citizen. So before we delay any > > further, I'd like to find out if there's any truth to this, and what the > > timeline for that might look like. > > > > Thanks! > > > > // jim > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
