> On Jan 31, 2014, at 1:30 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-01-30 19:30:40 -0800:
>>> On 30/01/14 16:54, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> I'm pretty sure it is useful to model images in Heat.
>>>
>>> Consider this scenario:
>>>
>>>
>>> resources:
>>> build_done_ha
many people
> know Mistral YAML?
>
> Maybe I'm overestimating the Python knowledge in the community, and
> underestimating the Mistral knowledge, but I would bet we're talking
> order(s?) of magnitude in terms of the difference. And I'm not saying
> learning Mis
Jirka, this is amazing work. Thanks to you, Giulio, Yanis, and everyone else
who made it happen.
Now, on to network management... :) ...
Sent from my mobile, please pardon the top posting.
From: Jiří Stránský
Sent: May 22, 2015 1:50 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-
On Jul 26, 2016 8:08 PM, "Gordon, Kent"
wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gonéri Le Bouder [mailto:gon...@lebouder.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 12:24 PM
> > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> > Subject: [E] [openstack-dev] [TripleO] scripts to do post deploy
On Jul 26, 2016 10:02 PM, "Emilien Macchi" wrote:
>
> I would love to hear some feedback about $topic, thanks.
Ian, Rhys, Jacob - this sounds like a big step in the right direction to
me, what do you guys think?
-Hugh
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Emilien Macchi
wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Joe Talerico wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Hugh Brock wrote:
>> On Jul 26, 2016 8:08 PM, "Gordon, Kent"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > -Original
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
> On 08/08/2016 11:05 AM, Hugh Brock wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Joe Talerico wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Hugh Brock wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
ins, please increase the memory for baremetal flavor on
>> rh1 tomorrow (to 6144?).
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/357532/
>> --
>> Best regards
>> Sagi Shnaidman
>
> ______
> OpenStack Devel
nd other services in the future as
> well), just with a different leading path. Not sure how doable it is though.
>
I am sure that that is the Correct Way to do it. We don't want another
process listening on a different port after we've put all this effort
into getting everything i
Why would TripleO not move to convergence at the earliest possible point?
On Jan 6, 2017 10:37 PM, "Thomas Herve" wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> > tl;dr everything looks great, and memory usage has dropped by about 64%
> > since the initial Newton release of Heat.
10 matches
Mail list logo
