will add another one:
Some elements are already using the old os-config-applier dir to store the
configuration templates.
It works, but I think is time to move them to os-apply-config to avoid
confusion.
Ghe Rivero
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> What time would work for you? How about Thursdays at 8am PST?
Works for me!
Ghe Rivero
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
+1
On 14 Jan 2015 19:15, "Clint Byrum" wrote:
> Hello! It has been a while since we expanded our review team. The
> numbers aren't easy to read with recent dips caused by the summit and
> holidays. However, I believe James has demonstrated superb review skills
> and a commitment to the project th
Hi all!
I can attend, but since is the recomended 'Off Week'
(https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Icehouse_Release_Schedule) (Yeah. It's
weird a week start on Thursday) we could skip it.
Ghe Rivero
On 05/01/2014 04:07 PM, Matt Wagner wrote:
> On 30/04/14 15:37 -0700, Devananda
k our 'population' there is minimal), although something
earlier is ok to me.
See you all in Atlanta!
Ghe Rivero
On 05/06/2014 02:58 AM, James Polley wrote:
> Actually, it's probably best that we don't do the first meeting at a
> US-unfriendly timezone in a week that the sum
+1 for the -core changes
On 04/08/2014 01:50 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
> tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
> bnemec
> greghaynes
> jdon
>
>
> On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> +1 for your proposed -core changes.
>>
>> Re your question about whether we should retroactively
1600 UTC for me is ok. Later than that in Europe (Friday
afternoon/night) could be a problem.
Ghe Rivero
On 04/14/2014 10:56 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> That may work. Let's see what the team members in Europe say about the
> proposed times.
>
> Doug
>
> On Mon, Apr 14,
there are some parts that can benefit from that.
Ghe Rivero
On 04/15/2014 11:05 AM, Chris Jones wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 15 April 2014 09:14, Daniel P. Berrange <mailto:berra...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> I supose that rewriting the code to be in Python is out of the
> que
+1 for the use of /usr/share and keeping the compatibility for a couple
of releases.
Ghe Rivero
On 04/15/2014 03:30 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2014-04-14 15:41:23 -0700:
>> Right now the os-*-config projects default to looking for their files in
+1 for the alternate slots.
Ghe Rivero
El 21/04/2014 17:57, "mar...@redhat.com" escribió:
>
> On 21/04/14 18:29, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:38 AM, mar...@redhat.com
wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I think both
Last cycle the Ironic liaison wasn't a core reviewer and things worked.
So I agree with the idea of relaxing the recommendation.
Ghe Rivero (Ironic liaison)
On 07/10/14 14:50, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Oct 7, 2014, at 7:55 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
Signed PGP part
On 06/10/14 17:56,
I vote for Mondays and Thursdays.
Ghe Rivero
On 08/10/14 10:46, Mehdi Abaakouk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
- Mondays at 1600 UTC [1]: #openstack-meeting-alt, #openstack-meeting-3
- Thursdays at 1600 UTC [2]: #openstack-meeting-3
- Thursdays at 1700 UTC [3
to retrieve images
and use them for a deployment. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/85130/
I rebased it one week ago, but apparently needs a new one. Will do today.
Ghe Rivero
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
an etherpad, and during the irc meeting just have a slot for
people to discuss anything that need further explanation, only mentioning
the topic but not the content.
Ghe Rivero
On Nov 13, 2014 5:08 PM, "Peeyush Gupta"
wrote:
> +1
>
> I agree with Lucas. Sounds like a good
+1
El 10/07/2014 10:12, "Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew" <
matthew.macdonald-wall...@hp.com> escribió:
> +1 from me.
>
> Matt
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com]
> > Sent: 09 July 2014 16:52
> > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> > Subject: [openstack-
+1
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Devananda van der Veen <
devananda@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to nominate Lucas Gomes for ironic-core. He's been consistently
> doing reviews for several months and has led a lot of the effort on the API
> and client libraries.
>
> Thanks for
327/
I'll take a look to the bp and the solutions proposed to see if something
can be reused.
Ghe Rivero
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:19 PM, John Garbutt wrote:
> Going back to Joe's comment:
> > Can both of these cases be covered by configuring the keystone catalog?
> +1
&
lable to me.
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
I'll be in DebConf13 (Switzerland) the week of August 11th-17th so I prefer
the week of t
As admin, use the parameter is_public='none' to retrieve all the
images(using v1 api). With v2 api, there is no need for a extra parameter
(also as admin).
Ghe Rivero
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Nikhil Komawar <
nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com> wrote:
> you could always
+1
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Devananda van der Veen <
devananda@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose to add Chris (NobodyCam) to ironic-core. He has been
> doing a lot of good reviews and running the weekly meetings when I've been
> unavailable due to travel.
>
>
> Cheers,
+1
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
> > So - calling for votes for Derek to become a TripleO core reviewer!
>
> +1
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bi
Quoting Clint Byrum (2015-11-06 09:07:20)
> Whether they are VMs or real machines, our tools
> should strive to be about the user and their workload, and not about the
> operator and their technology.
+1 This should be in a poster in every office.
G
+1
Quoting Monty Taylor (2015-12-03 17:44:13)
> Hey all,
>
> I'd like to propose that we include Morgan Fainberg as core on
> os-client-config. He's in the over/under on matching other active
> reviewers on the project, and he's got a good understanding of the
> related problem space. Also, he's i
I'm ok with that. The current core group is small and the project is critical
enough to have them as backup.
Ghe Rivero
Quoting Monty Taylor (2015-12-03 17:50:17)
> Hey all,
>
> os-client-config is now in the critical path for Infra's Nodepool,
> meaning that there are s
I love it! Thanks for the great job.
Ghe Rivero
Quoting Matthew Treinish (2015-12-04 21:38:29)
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As some people may have seen already we've been working on creating a test
> results dashboard up and running to visualize the state of the tests running
> in
wesome addition.
>
> I wholeheartedly concur. Ricky has been doing a great job. Having him in
> shade-core would be great.
++ Shade is getting a lot of attention lately, and more cores will help.
Ghe Rivero
_
I think nova should completely ignore this issue and boot the image no matter
what. This is an operational 'workflow', and nova doesn't need to know about
the image internals at all. If it boots, then is not nova problem.
Ghe Rivero
Quoting Clif Houck (2016-06-06 23:41:
Hi all!
I really like the idea of the group, so count me in!
Ghe Rivero
Quoting Clint Byrum (2016-06-17 23:52:43)
> ar·chi·tec·ture
> ˈärkəˌtek(t)SHər/
> noun
> noun: architecture
>
> 1.
>
> the art or practice of designing and constructing buildings.
&g
Is there any specific reason why this is require that way? or just a
"feature"?
Ghe Rivero
On 03/05/16 11:42, Matthew Booth wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 2:47 AM, Eli Qiao <mailto:liyong.q...@intel.com>> wrote:
hi team,
Is there any require that all compute
.py
and openstackcloud.py, and for any new capability to include, the first
discussion, always, is where to put it) Splitting it, will only
frustrate operators and users trying to remember which function is
included in each command (and knowing Murphy's law, they will always
choose
one sees?
Please let me know which days work as well.
I can do it almost any time, but will prefer to avoid Friday afternoons...
Ghe Rivero
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Uns
#2 makes more sense.
Ghe Rivero
Quoting Flavio Percoco (2016-01-08 14:06:28)
> Greetings,
>
> As some of you know already, google code is going to be shutdown. Some
> projects we're using are hosted and, unfortunately, some of them are
> unmaintained and perhaps going aw
e a shorter cycle (say, 4
months instead of 6) in the future here and there. I could totally see
projects take advantage of such a short cycle to place a "stabilization
cycle" or another limited-feature-addition period."
Would be nice to have more info about it. I guess if he ment
+1, although I would like to keep them to find scale bottlenecks. Maybe when
the new infra-cloud is up (we'll have full control over it, includind hw
access), we can pin these tests just to it.
Ghe Rivero
Quoting Sean Dague (2016-02-10 13:33:44)
> The largeops tests at this point ar
Russell already signed up, and as all TC
> workgroups it can include non-TC members (it's actually a great way to
> do succession planning at the TC).
>
> I'm still stuck on (re)defining the release tags to match the Liberty
> release models, but I plan to start working
to be fixed and
approved.
Ghe Rivero
Quoting Ihar Hrachyshka (2015-09-29 18:05:37)
> > On 25 Sep 2015, at 16:44, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > releases are approaching, so it’s the right time to start some bike
> > shedding on the mailing
My focus on the Ironic project has been decreasing in the last cycles, so
it's about time to relinquish my position as a oslo-ironic liaison so new
contributors can take over it and help ironic to be the vibrant project it
is.
So long, and thanks for all the fish,
Ghe Rivero
--
Pinky:
+1
Ghe Rivero
Quoting Monty Taylor (2016-02-22 08:31:44)
> On 02/22/2016 07:24 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Thierry Carrez > <mailto:thie...@openstack.org>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
&g
From: Ghe Rivero
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] A proposal to separate the design summit
Quoting Clayton O'Neill (2016-02-22 10:27:04)
> Is the expectation that the ops mid-cycle would continue separately,
> or be held with the meeting formerly known as the Design Summit?
>
&g
+1, I'm no longer involved in TripleO, so there is no reason to be core.
Ghe Rivero
Quoting James Slagle (2016-03-14 16:30:21)
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Dan Prince wrote:
> > Looking at the stats for the last 180 days I'd like to propose we
> > c
Quoting Morgan Fainberg (2015-04-04 02:55:59)
> I am looking forward to the Liberty cycle and seeing the special casing we do
> for SQLite in our migrations (and elsewhere). My inclination is that we should
> (similar to the deprecation of eventlet) deprecate support for SQLite in
> Keystone. In Li
41 matches
Mail list logo
