On 09/04/16 14:49, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I still don't have any idea what's wrong with the
Debian guide.
The standing issue that I recall that raises the maintenance burden is
the use of debconf rather than/in addition to manual config file edits
as per the other distros. I can't remember whe
Tom,
Would you elaborate more?
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Fifield"
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, April 9, 2016 6:20:31 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Constant attempts from Matthew Kassawara to remove
Debian from the install-guide
On 09/04/16 14:49, Thomas
As I've commented on Matthew's patch to the guide, you may just ask apt
not to ask questions provided by debconf, by prepending
DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive to it. Of course you will need to add
more options in case of an upgrade if you want to get rid of all the
questions, like adding force-conf
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Diana Clarke
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> To that effect, i am capturing stuff here:
>> https://davanum.wordpress.com/2016/04/08/new-to-openstack-reviews-start-here/
>
> Here are a few more links for your list, Dims. I rememb
On Apr 9, 2016 11:51 AM, Tom Fifield wrote:
> The standing issue that I recall that raises the maintenance burden is
> the use of debconf rather than/in addition to manual config file edits
> as per the other distros. I can't remember whether you already tried a
> version without debconf or n
On 4/8/2016 5:54 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote:
I know a lot of folks explicitly avoid a +0 vote with a comment because
you don't get "credit" for it in statistics. Whether or not that should
matter is another discussion, but there is a significant disincentive to
no-voting right now.
-
Jay Faulkne
Thanks Amrith for going through the list and triaging the bugs. I think
it's a great thing that we now have bugs assigned as 'low-hanging-fruit'.
It should make it easier for newcomers to pick bugs and get started.
Regards,
Mariam.
From: Amrith Kumar
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing L
Hi All,
I have proposed a blueprint
(https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/instance-memory-snapshot) and nova
spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295415/) to improve the current snapshot
capability. In the past this topic has been introduced and several times it has
been left behind.
This thread is completely and totally inappropriate. Attacking a person
the mailing list is a violation of our community standards.
I'm going to respond to a different email in the chain because Anne asks
a question. However, this approach to this problem is categorically
unacceptable in OpenS
On Apr 8, 2016, at 2:21 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> Another approach to consider would be to continue to offer the ATC
> pass for a single commit, but to require a little more participation
> in order to vote in TC/PTL elections (modulo Foundation bye-laws etc.)
+1 on this. A commit gets you invite
On 04/09/2016 06:21 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> This thread is completely and totally inappropriate. Attacking a person
> the mailing list is a violation of our community standards.
Monty,
I don't take it lightly either. Please think twice about who's behavior
is inappropriate.
Because I've seen a
I much prefer this lib work.
Thanks, Chris
2016/04/08 4:32、Chris Dent
>> On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, michael mccune wrote:
>>
>> 1. version discover guideline for API microversions
>> https://review.openstack.org/243429
>>
>> 2. client interaction guideline for API microversions
>> https://review.open
2016/04/08 10:55、Anita Kuno :
>> On 04/08/2016 01:42 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
>> 2016-04-08 19:26 GMT+02:00 Davanum Srinivas :
>>
>>> Team,
>>>
>>> Steve pointed out to a problem in Stackalytics:
>>> https://twitter.com/stevebot/status/718185667709267969
>>
>>
>> There are many ways to game
On Apr 9, 2016 12:05, "Ken'ichi Ohmichi" wrote:
>
>
> 2016/04/08 10:55、Anita Kuno :
>
> >> On 04/08/2016 01:42 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> >> 2016-04-08 19:26 GMT+02:00 Davanum Srinivas :
> >>
> >>> Team,
> >>>
> >>> Steve pointed out to a problem in Stackalytics:
> >>> https://twitter.com/steveb
I have a quick question:
How is anyone hurt out harmed by the practice? I agree it isn't helpful.
But it isn't harming either. It could be gaming and it could be ignorance -
mistakes by not knowing.
I'm asking because I see the same predictable personalities making passive
aggressive accusations a
Thanks to Dims and Steve for bringing this up.
It has long been my opinion that +0's are invaluable for the question
asking, and for getting to understand software, and unfortunately +0's are lost
in the noise. So a while ago, I posted to the ML [1] asking about making +0's
more visible
HTML rendering:
http://www.openstack.org/blog/2016/04/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-20160408/
SuccessBot Says
===
* Ttx: Design Summit placeholder sessions pushed to the Austin official
* schedule.
* Pabelanger: Launched our first ubuntu-xenial job with node pool!
* Mriedem:
basically, you need to inherit the base class and impl the get_samples
interface, then registry it in setup.cfg.
see an example in kilo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/145819/ this
patch adds some new meters polling by compute agent
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Murali Krishna wrote:
>
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
