[openstack-dev] [nova][cell] Can nova do live migration cross cells?

2016-01-08 Thread 少合冯
Hi, all Now I'm working on the migrations list/show API. The new api defines migrations is a sub-collection of an instance. GET v2.1/tenant_id/servers/server-id/migrations/migration-id I need to support the new cell API to get a migration of a specified instance. get_migration_by_instance_and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ec2-api] Removing Nova's In tree ec2 API code in favor of ec2-api project

2016-01-08 Thread Thierry Carrez
Davanum Srinivas wrote: Dear Nova cores, Sorry this did not make into the Nova weekly meeting agenda yesterday. Is it time for dropping the EC2/ObjectStore REST API Since we've told folks since Kilo that we will be removing this code and we dropped the entries api-paste.ini in Liberty? https://

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][stackalytics] some projects not visible in stackalytics now

2016-01-08 Thread Thierry Carrez
joehuang wrote: Only api-wg, openstack-user-stories, opos-tools-contrib, opos-tools-generic, opos-tools-monitoring are listed in http://stackalytics.com/?project_type=openstack-others Many OpenStack other projects are disappeared. We should take the opportunity to rename those from "openstack-

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][stackalytics] some projects not visible in stackalytics now

2016-01-08 Thread Thierry Carrez
Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] All the projects you are mentioning are hosted on the OpenStack infrastructure (in the space formally known as Stackforge) but are not official OpenStack projects. I meant "formerly" :) -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] help needed: volunteers for bug skimming (1 week)

2016-01-08 Thread Markus Zoeller
Anthony Chow wrote on 01/07/2016 07:02:04 PM: > From: Anthony Chow > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Date: 01/07/2016 07:04 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] help needed: volunteers for > bug skimming (1 week) > > Sounds like the volunteer

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][aodh][vitrage] The purpose of notification about alarm updating

2016-01-08 Thread Julien Danjou
On Thu, Jan 07 2016, AFEK, Ifat (Ifat) wrote: > We have two motivations: one is that we want to get notifications on every > change, but we don't want to register our webhook to each and every alarm; and > the other is that we already listen to the message bus for other openstack > components, so

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ec2-api] Removing Nova's In tree ec2 API code in favor of ec2-api project

2016-01-08 Thread Alexandre Levine
Thierry, The ec2-api project is in gating and totally functional. We'll apply for it to become OpenStack project very shortly. Next week in fact. Best regards, Alex Levine On 1/8/16 9:47 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Davanum Srinivas wrote: Dear Nova cores, Sorry this did not make into the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [all] Excessively high greenlet default + excessively low connection pool defaults leads to connection pool latency, timeout errors, idle database connections / workers

2016-01-08 Thread Radomir Dopieralski
On 01/07/2016 05:55 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: but also even if you're under something like mod_wsgi, you can spawn a child process or worker thread regardless. You always have a Python interpreter running and all the things it can do. Actually you can't, reliably. Or, more precisely, you really sh

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

2016-01-08 Thread Julien Danjou
On Thu, Jan 07 2016, Jay Pipes wrote: > OK, I just watched that. Sorry, still don't see the value that Mimic provides > over unit testing the client interfaces and mocking out the HTTP payloads so > you have strict control over the expectations. > > The problem that Glyph noted in the video about

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

2016-01-08 Thread Thierry Carrez
Jim Rollenhagen wrote: [...] Here's the catch - mimic is built on twisted. I know twisted was previously removed from OpenStack (or at least people said "pls no", I don't know the full history). We didn't intend to stealth-introduce twisted back into g-r, but it was pointed out to me that it may

Re: [openstack-dev] [chef] deprecation and removal of old branches

2016-01-08 Thread Jan Klare
Hi, Good point, i will talk to infra and figure out how to properly push these eol tags to the last commits of the branches before we remove them. Since i only got positive feedback on this, i will also go ahead and ask them to help me with the cleanup. Cheers, Jan > On 07 Jan 2016, at 07:42

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [all] Excessively high greenlet default + excessively low connection pool defaults leads to connection pool latency, timeout errors, idle database connections / workers

2016-01-08 Thread Chris Friesen
On 01/07/2016 09:49 AM, Roman Podoliaka wrote: Actually we already do that in the parent process. The parent process: 1) starts and creates a socket 2) binds the socket and calls listen() on it passing the backlog value (http://linux.die.net/man/2/listen) 3) passes the socket to the eventlet W

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [all] Excessively high greenlet default + excessively low connection pool defaults leads to connection pool latency, timeout errors, idle database connections / workers

2016-01-08 Thread Chris Friesen
On 01/07/2016 06:55 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: On 01/07/2016 11:02 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 01/07/2016 09:56 AM, Brant Knudson wrote: On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 6:39 AM, Clayton O'Neill mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Roman Podoliaka mailto:rpodoly...@mi

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [all] Excessively high greenlet default + excessively low connection pool defaults leads to connection pool latency, timeout errors, idle database connections / workers

2016-01-08 Thread Chris Friesen
On 01/07/2016 05:44 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: On 01/07/2016 07:39 AM, Clayton O'Neill wrote: On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Roman Podoliaka wrote: Linux gurus please correct me here, but my understanding is that Linux kernel queues up to $backlog number of connections *per socket*. In our case

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Adding "IPv6" bracket handling utilities in openstacklib.

2016-01-08 Thread Sofer Athlan-Guyot
Cody Herriges writes: Sorry I didn't see you reply before. Comments below. > Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: >> Hi, >> >> There are a few places where I would like to be able to check for IPv6 >> address and add bracket to the parameters. I think that would be a nice >> addition to the puppet-opens

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] kilo and liberty is blocked on bug 1532048

2016-01-08 Thread Jordan Pittier
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Matt Riedemann > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > [email protected]> > Date: January 7, 2016 at 19:11:10 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not f

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cell] Can nova do live migration cross cells?

2016-01-08 Thread John Garbutt
On 8 January 2016 at 08:17, 少合冯 wrote: > Hi, all > > Now I'm working on the migrations list/show API. > The new api defines migrations is a sub-collection of an instance. > GET v2.1/tenant_id/servers/server-id/migrations/migration-id > > I need to support the new cell API to get a migration of

[openstack-dev] [celery][taskflow] Reg. celery and task-flow

2016-01-08 Thread ESWAR RAO
Hi All, Please let me know whether celery is replacement for taskflow. As per my understanding, task-flow can break jobs into tasks and execute them. >From celery wiki, it also does almost similar behaviour. I guess in most of openstack components taskflow is widely used. Any places where its b

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ec2-api] Removing Nova's In tree ec2 API code in favor of ec2-api project

2016-01-08 Thread Tim Bell
> -Original Message- > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 07 January 2016 23:04 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova][ec2-api] Removing Nova's In tree ec2 API > code in favor of ec2-api project > > Dea

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova][cells] Should flavors in the API DB for cells v2 be soft-deletable?

2016-01-08 Thread John Garbutt
On 7 January 2016 at 19:59, Matt Riedemann wrote: > There is a cells v2 change up for review [1] which creates the flavor tables > in the API DB. > > I noted that those table definitions include the soft-delete columns > (deleted and deleted_at), which at the YVR summit and in other threads [2] >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ec2-api] Removing Nova's In tree ec2 API code in favor of ec2-api project

2016-01-08 Thread Thierry Carrez
Alexandre Levine wrote: The ec2-api project is in gating and totally functional. We'll apply for it to become OpenStack project very shortly. Next week in fact. Great to hear! Thanks Alex. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __ OpenS

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal for new metrics-threshold-filter

2016-01-08 Thread John Garbutt
On 7 January 2016 at 18:49, SURO wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have proposed a nova-spec[1] for a new scheduling filter based on >> metrics thresholds. This is slightly different than weighted metrics filter. >> The rationale and use-case is explained in detail in the spec[1]. >> >> The implementati

[openstack-dev] [oslo][osdk] PrettyTable needs a home in OpenStack

2016-01-08 Thread Flavio Percoco
Greetings, As some of you know already, google code is going to be shutdown. Some projects we're using are hosted and, unfortunately, some of them are unmaintained and perhaps going away. One of these projects is PrettyTable. This point was raised by Erno in this patch[0] from jd__. PrettyTable

Re: [openstack-dev] [doc] DocImpact vs. reno

2016-01-08 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/07/2016 06:21 PM, Lana Brindley wrote: > >> On 7 Jan 2016, at 2:09 AM, Sean Dague wrote: >> >> On 01/06/2016 09:02 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >>> On 2016-01-06 07:52:48 -0500 (-0500), Sean Dague wrote: >>> [...] I think auto openning against a project, and shuffling it to manuals m

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][osdk] PrettyTable needs a home in OpenStack

2016-01-08 Thread Davanum Srinivas
#2 please :) Thanks, Dims On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > Greetings, > > As some of you know already, google code is going to be shutdown. Some > projects we're using are hosted and, unfortunately, some of them are > unmaintained and perhaps going away. > > One of these p

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][stackalytics] some projects not visible in stackalytics now

2016-01-08 Thread Zhipeng Huang
Hi Thierry, Does this mean big tent projects = TC approved ? My understanding was that for those project migrated from stackforge to OpenStack infra now, is OpenStack big tent projects but not TC-approved OpenStack projects. On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Thierry Carrez

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove][Outreachy] Add configuration groups for CouchDB

2016-01-08 Thread Victoria Martínez de la Cruz
Having passed more than a week an this task not being claimed by anybody, Sonali will take this task. The spec is already up for review in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/263980/. Thanks! Victoria 2016-01-04 9:32 GMT-03:00 Victoria Martínez de la Cruz < [email protected]>: > Reta

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] [sahara] Adding support for HBase in Trove

2016-01-08 Thread Amrith Kumar
As Kevin suggests, I'm adding [sahara] to the subject line. Others in sahara who now see this thread, apologies for sending you a delayed invitation to the party. There's still lots of food and beer so come on in! -amrith > -Original Message- > From: Fox, Kevin M [mailto:kevin@pnnl

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][osdk] PrettyTable needs a home in OpenStack

2016-01-08 Thread Major Hayden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/08/2016 07:06 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > I'm saying all the above because we now need to find a home for it in > OpenStack. > > I've identified 2 possible places: > > 1) Oslo, as we maintaing cross-project libraries and some of them are > no

[openstack-dev] centos6.5 libvirt 1.2.14 virsh hang

2016-01-08 Thread 王李明
hi all: my environment is centos6.5 libvirt version is 1.2.14-1 qemu version is 1.7.0-1 I use openstack create a windows guest about two days later I run virsh list but the the process is hang virsh list can not return any thing it hang then I run /etc/init.d/li

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cell] Can nova do live migration cross cells?

2016-01-08 Thread Andrew Laski
On 01/08/16 at 12:33pm, John Garbutt wrote: On 8 January 2016 at 08:17, 少合冯 wrote: Hi, all Now I'm working on the migrations list/show API. The new api defines migrations is a sub-collection of an instance. GET v2.1/tenant_id/servers/server-id/migrations/migration-id I need to support the

Re: [openstack-dev] RDO, packstack, Keypair creation is failing

2016-01-08 Thread Flavio Percoco
Hey Thales, This is not a support mailing list but a development one. To have support on RDO specific matters, I recommend you to join the RDO mailing list[0]. You can also join the openstack one[1]. [0] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rdo-list [1] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailm

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova][cells] Should flavors in the API DB for cells v2 be soft-deletable?

2016-01-08 Thread Andrew Laski
On 01/08/16 at 12:43pm, John Garbutt wrote: On 7 January 2016 at 19:59, Matt Riedemann wrote: There is a cells v2 change up for review [1] which creates the flavor tables in the API DB. I noted that those table definitions include the soft-delete columns (deleted and deleted_at), which at the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] Deprecating the live_migration_flag and block_migration_flag config options

2016-01-08 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 09:07:00PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 12:23 +0100, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:12:06PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > commit 8ecf93e[1] got me thinking - the live_migration_flag config > > > o

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova][cells] Should flavors in the API DB for cells v2 be soft-deletable?

2016-01-08 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 08/01/2016 15:10, Andrew Laski a écrit : On 01/08/16 at 12:43pm, John Garbutt wrote: On 7 January 2016 at 19:59, Matt Riedemann wrote: There is a cells v2 change up for review [1] which creates the flavor tables in the API DB. I noted that those table definitions include the soft-delete

[openstack-dev] [nova] config options: IRC meeting at Jan. 11th

2016-01-08 Thread Markus Zoeller
First things first, I'd like to thank those people who are contributing to this task very much! It's good to see the progress we already made and that the knowledge of this area is now spread amongst more people. The second thing I'd like to talk about is the next steps. It would be great if we co

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

2016-01-08 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 24/12/15 16:49 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: Hello, it's another topic about glance v2 adoption in Nova, but it's different from the others. I want to declare that there is a set of commits, that make Nova version agnostic and allow to work with both glance apis. The idea of the solution is to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

2016-01-08 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 29/12/15 07:41 -0600, Sam Matzek wrote: On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: Hello, it's another topic about glance v2 adoption in Nova, but it's different from the others. I want to declare that there is a set of commits, that make Nova version agnostic and allow to work

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate

2016-01-08 Thread Hongbin Lu
Done: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/ Best regards, Hongbin -Original Message- From: Adrian Otto [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: January-07-16 10:19 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily rem

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova][cells] Should flavors in the API DB for cells v2 be soft-deletable?

2016-01-08 Thread Belmiro Moreira
IMHO I think it's a great way to fix the URI problem. +1 Belmiro On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > > > Le 08/01/2016 15:10, Andrew Laski a écrit : > >> On 01/08/16 at 12:43pm, John Garbutt wrote: >> >>> On 7 January 2016 at 19:59, Matt Riedemann >>> wrote: >>> There i

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Seeking FFE for "Add CIM namespace metadata definitions"

2016-01-08 Thread Flavio Percoco
O 04/01/16 20:46 +, Bhandaru, Malini K wrote: Hello Glance Team! Hope you had a wonderful vacation and wishing you health and happiness for 2016. Would very much appreciate your considering https://review.openstack.org/259694 for a feature freeze exception. Thank you to Tr

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cell] Can nova do live migration cross cells?

2016-01-08 Thread 少合冯
2016-01-08 21:53 GMT+08:00 Andrew Laski : > On 01/08/16 at 12:33pm, John Garbutt wrote: > >> On 8 January 2016 at 08:17, 少合冯 wrote: >> >>> Hi, all >>> >>> Now I'm working on the migrations list/show API. >>> The new api defines migrations is a sub-collection of an instance. >>> GET v2.1/tenant

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

2016-01-08 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 10:01:45AM -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 29/12/15 07:41 -0600, Sam Matzek wrote: > >On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Mikhail Fedosin > >wrote: > >>Hello, it's another topic about glance v2 adoption in Nova, but it's > >>different from the others. I want to declare that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Xenplugin + Glance_v2 = Hate

2016-01-08 Thread John Garbutt
On 4 January 2016 at 12:55, Sean Dague wrote: > On 12/24/2015 08:51 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: >> Hello! As you may know there is a big initiative to adopt glance v2 api >> in Nova and the important part is making related changes in xenglugin. >> Unfortunately xenplugin doesn't use neither nova.im

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cell] Can nova do live migration cross cells?

2016-01-08 Thread 少合冯
Thank you very much. . And Andrew Laski has answer my second question. 2016-01-08 20:33 GMT+08:00 John Garbutt : > On 8 January 2016 at 08:17, 少合冯 wrote: > > Hi, all > > > > Now I'm working on the migrations list/show API. > > The new api defines migrations is a sub-collection of an instance.

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Adding "IPv6" bracket handling utilities in openstacklib.

2016-01-08 Thread Sofer Athlan-Guyot
Hi all, I've got an input from a fellow worker[1]. Basically, transparently transforming user data in puppet is opening a big can of worms. He came up with a rather contrived example, but it's definitively worth discussing it. So in the vncproxy example, if the user does this: $vncproxy_hos

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Openstack version changes affects Fuel-CI

2016-01-08 Thread Sergii Golovatiuk
Hi crew, Igor and I are about to merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238846/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/235254/ These patches are destructive to our CI. They require to upload a new ISO to CI slaves. However, the process takes 2-3 hours to roll our a new ISO. Please do not submit patche

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cell] Can nova do live migration cross cells?

2016-01-08 Thread 少合冯
still a question in line. Thanks. 2016-01-08 21:53 GMT+08:00 Andrew Laski : > On 01/08/16 at 12:33pm, John Garbutt wrote: > >> On 8 January 2016 at 08:17, 少合冯 wrote: >> >>> Hi, all >>> >>> Now I'm working on the migrations list/show API. >>> The new api defines migrations is a sub-collection of

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up for decomposed plugin break

2016-01-08 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, The commit https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/5d53dfb8d64186b5b1d2f356fbff8f222e15d1b2 may break the decomposed plugins that make use of the method _get_tenant_id_for_create It would have been nice if there was a deprecation warning. Options: 1. Decomposed plugins fix this 2

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] Weekly Status Report

2016-01-08 Thread Markus Zoeller
Below are the bug stats of the week "Mitaka R-13". Increases/decreases compared to "Mitaka R18" are in parantheses. (I forgot to send the mails in December...) Stats = New bugs which are *not* assigned to any subteam count: 5 (-7) query

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Problem with FilterAction in a TableTab

2016-01-08 Thread Chad Roberts
I'm working on streamlining the Sahara UI by reducing the number of panels and organizing them into tabs rather than individual panels. I've come across the following sticking point. Hopefully, someone can lend a hand. I now have a group of tabs in a TabbedTableView (each tab is a TableTab). Som

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova][cells] Should flavors in the API DB for cells v2 be soft-deletable?

2016-01-08 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/08/2016 09:10 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: > On 01/08/16 at 12:43pm, John Garbutt wrote: >> On 7 January 2016 at 19:59, Matt Riedemann >> wrote: >>> There is a cells v2 change up for review [1] which creates the flavor >>> tables >>> in the API DB. >>> >>> I noted that those table definitions inc

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

2016-01-08 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 08/01/16 14:45 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 10:01:45AM -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 29/12/15 07:41 -0600, Sam Matzek wrote: >On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: >>Hello, it's another topic about glance v2 adoption in Nova, but it's >>differe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up for decomposed plugin break

2016-01-08 Thread Fawad Khaliq
Gary, Thanks for sending the email about the breakage. +1 to the deprecation warning. Fawad Khaliq On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > The commit > https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/5d53dfb8d64186b5b1d2f356fbff8f222e15d1b2 > may > break the decomposed plugins

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up for decomposed plugin break

2016-01-08 Thread Gary Kotton
I have posted https://review.openstack.org/265315 to try and help the decomposed plugins have a breather. In addition to this this may also break the aaS. Thanks Gary From: Gary Kotton mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: OpenStack List mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday,

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] kilo and liberty is blocked on bug 1532048

2016-01-08 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 1/8/2016 4:59 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Ian Cordasco mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: -Original Message- From: Matt Riedemann mailto:[email protected]>> Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage question

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up for decomposed plugin break

2016-01-08 Thread Chris Dent
On Fri, 8 Jan 2016, Gary Kotton wrote: The commit https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/5d53dfb8d64186- b5b1d2f356fbff8f222e15d1b2 may break the decomposed plugins that make use of the method _get_tenant_id_for_create Just out of curiosity, is it not standard practice that a plugin shoul

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][osdk] PrettyTable needs a home in OpenStack

2016-01-08 Thread Dean Troyer
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > 2) OpenStack Client team as they maintain cliff already and it'd > perhaps make more sense to have this library there. > I would support this as we already have os-client-config as well as cliff. I would love to be able to identify some fol

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up for decomposed plugin break

2016-01-08 Thread Henry Gessau
Gary Kotton wrote: > commit > https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/5d53dfb8d64186b5b1d2f356fbff8f222e15d1b2 > may > break the decomposed plugins that make use of the method > _get_tenant_id_for_create Note that this is a private method. Plugins should avoid using private methods. Unfort

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Problem with FilterAction in a TableTab

2016-01-08 Thread Justin Pomeroy
Hi Chad, I wonder if you would benefit from this patch [1] which moves the server filtering methods out of DataTableView and into MultiTableMixin. There is also another patch [2] dependent on this that moves the Images table into a tab, which sounds similar to what you're doing. [1] https:/

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][osdk] PrettyTable needs a home in OpenStack

2016-01-08 Thread Ghe Rivero
#2 makes more sense. Ghe Rivero Quoting Flavio Percoco (2016-01-08 14:06:28) > Greetings, > > As some of you know already, google code is going to be shutdown. Some > projects we're using are hosted and, unfortunately, some of them are > unmaintained and perhaps going away. > > One of these proje

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][stackalytics] some projects not visible in stackalytics now

2016-01-08 Thread Thierry Carrez
Zhipeng Huang wrote: Does this mean big tent projects = TC approved ? My understanding was that for those project migrated from stackforge to OpenStack infra now, is OpenStack big tent projects but not TC-approved OpenStack projects. No. As was made pretty clear when Stackforge was decommission

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][stackalytics] some projects not visible in stackalytics now

2016-01-08 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-01-08 21:30:31 +0800 (+0800), Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Does this mean big tent projects = TC approved ? My understanding > was that for those project migrated from stackforge to OpenStack > infra now, is OpenStack big tent projects but not TC-approved > OpenStack projects. The "big tent" is

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

2016-01-08 Thread Ben Meyer
On 01/07/2016 06:28 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 01/07/2016 06:12 PM, Ben Meyer wrote: >> On 01/07/2016 03:32 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: >>> On 01/07/2016 03:01 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 02:41:12PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > On 01/07/2016 02:09 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Problem with FilterAction in a TableTab

2016-01-08 Thread Chad Roberts
Thanks Justin. That might be just what I'm looking for. I'll give it a go. On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Justin Pomeroy wrote: > Hi Chad, > > I wonder if you would benefit from this patch [1] which moves the server > filtering methods out of DataTableView and into MultiTableMixin. There is

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][osdk] PrettyTable needs a home in OpenStack

2016-01-08 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 08/01/16 08:36 -0430, Flavio Percoco wrote: Greetings, As some of you know already, google code is going to be shutdown. Some projects we're using are hosted and, unfortunately, some of them are unmaintained and perhaps going away. One of these projects is PrettyTable. This point was raised

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][osdk] PrettyTable needs a home in OpenStack

2016-01-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Dean Troyer's message of 2016-01-08 09:56:53 -0600: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > > > 2) OpenStack Client team as they maintain cliff already and it'd > > perhaps make more sense to have this library there. > > > > I would support this as we already have

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Seeking FFE for "Support single disk image OVA/OVF package upload"

2016-01-08 Thread stuart . mclaren
Hello Glance Team! Hope you had a wonderful vacation and wishing you health and happiness for 2016. Would very much appreciate your considering https://review.openstack.org/194868 for a feature freeze exception. I believe the spec is pretty solid, and we can deliver on the imp

[openstack-dev] [API] [Glance] New v2 Image Import Specification Discussion

2016-01-08 Thread Ian Cordasco
Hey all, I'm well aware that this isn't exactly timely because we've partially agreed on the import spec in large strokes. [1]_ I haven't had a great deal of time before now to really dig into the spec, though, so I'm bringing my feedback. I've spoken to some API-WG members and other Glance tea

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] help needed: volunteers for bug skimming (1 week)

2016-01-08 Thread Anthony Chow
I wanted to get involved (or starting to get involve). What is the system requirement for bug triage? So my next step should be to join the Nova bug team by signing up at https://launchpad.net/~nova-bugs? I guess the IRC channel is #openstack-nova? Or I should use #openstack-dev? Thanks and ha

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove][Outreachy] Add configuration groups for CouchDB

2016-01-08 Thread Vyvial, Craig
Sound good to me Victoria. Thanks, -Craig On Jan 8, 2016, at 7:35 AM, Victoria Martínez de la Cruz mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Having passed more than a week an this task not being claimed by anybody, Sonali will take this task. The spec is already up for review in https://

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

2016-01-08 Thread Sam Matzek
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 29/12/15 07:41 -0600, Sam Matzek wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Mikhail Fedosin >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, it's another topic about glance v2 adoption in Nova, but it's >>> different from the others. I want to declare that th

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

2016-01-08 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 11:00:35AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > >[...] > >Here's the catch - mimic is built on twisted. I know twisted was > >previously removed from OpenStack (or at least people said "pls no", I > >don't know the full history). We didn't intend to stealt

Re: [openstack-dev] [API] [Glance] New v2 Image Import Specification Discussion

2016-01-08 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: Ian Cordasco Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: January 8, 2016 at 11:16:35 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject:  [openstack-dev] [API] [Glance] New v2 Image Import Specification

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Adding "IPv6" bracket handling utilities in openstacklib.

2016-01-08 Thread Cody Herriges
Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: > Hi all, > > I've got an input from a fellow worker[1]. Basically, transparently > transforming user data in puppet is opening a big can of worms. > > He came up with a rather contrived example, but it's definitively worth > discussing it. > > So in the vncproxy examp

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] Deprecating the live_migration_flag and block_migration_flag config options

2016-01-08 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 14:11 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 09:07:00PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 12:23 +0100, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:12:06PM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > c

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal for new metrics-threshold-filter

2016-01-08 Thread SURO
Hi John, Thanks for the reply! Originally, I had uploaded the code for review on 2nd Dec [1]. As I did not receive any review/feedback on the same, I thought having a blue-print/spec may help people review the same. So I had put the bp/spec up for review on 14th Dec [2]. As it is a plugin-bas

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Seeking FFE for "Support single disk image OVA/OVF package upload"

2016-01-08 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 08/01/16 17:03 +, [email protected] wrote: Hello Glance Team! Hope you had a wonderful vacation and wishing you health and happiness for 2016. Would very much appreciate your considering https://review.openstack.org/194868 for a feature freeze exception. I believe t

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] help needed: volunteers for bug skimming (1 week)

2016-01-08 Thread Augustina Ragwitz
I signed up for the week before the Nova Midcycle meeting. Even though I'm still new, I feel capable of at least getting the tags mostly right. When I'm not quite sure which tag it would fall under, I search for similar bugs and see how they were tagged. I did have one clarifying question, wha

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

2016-01-08 Thread Jay Pipes
On 01/07/2016 07:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 07:18:15PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: On 01/07/2016 06:42 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 03:32:39PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: On 01/07/2016 03:01 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 02:41:12PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

2016-01-08 Thread Sam Matzek
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Sam Matzek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: >> On 29/12/15 07:41 -0600, Sam Matzek wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Mikhail Fedosin >>> wrote: Hello, it's another topic about glance v2 adoption in Nova, but i

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Temporarily remove swarm func test from gate

2016-01-08 Thread Egor Guz
Hongbin, I belive most failures are related to containers tests. Maybe we should comment only them out and keep Swarm cluster provisioning. Thoughts? — Egor On Jan 8, 2016, at 06:37, Hongbin Lu mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Done: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/264998/ Best regards,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

2016-01-08 Thread Ben Meyer
On 01/08/2016 12:56 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 11:00:35AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Jim Rollenhagen wrote: >>> [...] >>> Here's the catch - mimic is built on twisted. I know twisted was >>> previously removed from OpenStack (or at least people said "pls no", I >>> do

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

2016-01-08 Thread gord chung
On 08/01/16 04:49 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Thu, Jan 07 2016, Jay Pipes wrote: OK, I just watched that. Sorry, still don't see the value that Mimic provides over unit testing the client interfaces and mocking out the HTTP payloads so you have strict control over the expectations. The probl

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] help needed: volunteers for bug skimming (1 week)

2016-01-08 Thread Anthony Chow
There is an URL for the duty: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage#Weekly_bug_skimming_duty BTW: how or where do you sign up? Have a nice weekend and happy bug hunting. anthony. On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Augustina Ragwitz wrote: > I signed up for the week before the Nova Mid

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Heads up for decomposed plugin break

2016-01-08 Thread Sean M. Collins
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 07:50:47AM PST, Chris Dent wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jan 2016, Gary Kotton wrote: > > >The commit https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/5d53dfb8d64186- > >b5b1d2f356fbff8f222e15d1b2 may break the decomposed plugins that make > >use of the method _get_tenant_id_for_create >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

2016-01-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2016-01-08 09:56:46 -0800: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 11:00:35AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > >[...] > > >Here's the catch - mimic is built on twisted. I know twisted was > > >previously removed from OpenStack (or at least peo

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

2016-01-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2016-01-07 11:09:32 -0800: > Hi all, > > A change to global-requirements[1] introduces mimic, which is an http > server that can mock various APIs, including nova and ironic, including > control of error codes and timeouts. The ironic team plans to use th

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

2016-01-08 Thread Davanum Srinivas
yes Jay, i have -W on the bot proposed merge, pending this discussion: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/263592/ -- Dims On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 01/07/2016 07:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 07:18:15PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: >>> >>> On 01

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

2016-01-08 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:08:04PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 01/07/2016 07:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: snippity snip snip > >We haven't made it a dep for anything yet, only added to g-r. > > According to Dims, not to g-r, but to u-c, right Dims? Not sure if that > makes functionally any diff

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

2016-01-08 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:39:52PM -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > yes Jay, i have -W on the bot proposed merge, pending this discussion: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/263592/ Note that this doesn't actually block mimic from being in g-r, or being used. It's already in g-r. You'd need to rev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] help needed: volunteers for bug skimming (1 week)

2016-01-08 Thread Augustina Ragwitz
On 2016-01-08 11:27, Anthony Chow wrote: There is an URL for the duty: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage#Weekly_bug_skimming_duty [3] Right, I read the wiki and it wasn't clear to me. Here's what the wiki says: "Since Nova is such an active project with a high number of incomin

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

2016-01-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2016-01-08 11:52:51 -0800: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:08:04PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > > On 01/07/2016 07:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > snippity snip snip > > > >We haven't made it a dep for anything yet, only added to g-r. > > > > According to Dims

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] help needed: volunteers for bug skimming (1 week)

2016-01-08 Thread Anthony Chow
Cool. And how or where did you sign up for this skimming duty? thanks and have a nice weekend, anthony. On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Augustina Ragwitz wrote: > On 2016-01-08 11:27, Anthony Chow wrote: > >> There is an URL for the duty: >> >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage#

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] help needed: volunteers for bug skimming (1 week)

2016-01-08 Thread Augustina Ragwitz
I think I just answered my own question ;) I looked at the blog post Markus provided in another part of this thread and it looks like "Skimming Duty" means both tag the bugs and the triaging step of confirming them such that they should no longer be in "New" status after you've touched them. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

2016-01-08 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2016-01-08 12:30:33 -0800: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:13:15PM -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2016-01-08 11:52:51 -0800: > > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:08:04PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > > > > On 01/07/2016 07:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

2016-01-08 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:13:15PM -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2016-01-08 11:52:51 -0800: > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:08:04PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > > > On 01/07/2016 07:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > snippity snip snip > > > > > >We haven't ma

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][bugs] help needed: volunteers for bug skimming (1 week)

2016-01-08 Thread Anthony Chow
thanks so much. :) On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Augustina Ragwitz wrote: > I think I just answered my own question ;) I looked at the blog post > Markus provided in another part of this thread and it looks like "Skimming > Duty" means both tag the bugs and the triaging step of confirming the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

2016-01-08 Thread Jay Pipes
On 01/08/2016 02:52 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:08:04PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: On 01/07/2016 07:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: snippity snip snip We haven't made it a dep for anything yet, only added to g-r. According to Dims, not to g-r, but to u-c, right Dims? No

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

2016-01-08 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:39:51PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 01/08/2016 02:52 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > >On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:08:04PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > >>On 01/07/2016 07:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > >snippity snip snip > > > >>>We haven't made it a dep for anything yet, only

  1   2   >