Excerpts from Dean Troyer's message of 2016-01-08 09:56:53 -0600: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 7:06 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > 2) OpenStack Client team as they maintain cliff already and it'd > > perhaps make more sense to have this library there. > > > > I would support this as we already have os-client-config as well as cliff. > I would love to be able to identify some folks who can commit some time for > a transition and initial core team.
+1 -- we've definitely proven that teams other than Oslo can manage shared libraries, so if the OSC team is prepared to adopt it that would be a good home. > > > One thing to note is that this library has been quite stable, which > > means it won't, hopefully, add too much work to the team. > > > > This would actually solve a pain point we have had a couple of times in the > past when PrettyTable changes broke us unexpectedly. The recent stability > is encouraging. > > dt > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
