Vxlan is not supported in SR-IOV and flat network should work from Kilo see
commit[1]
Like I said you need to check your physical_device_mappings is correct can you
post your
Did you put your agent config in /etc/neutron/conf.d/neutron-sriov-nic-agent?
So on the compute node you should do the fo
hi Vikas Choudhary, when ovs-agent service recover(ovs-agent process restart),
the dhcp port will not re-binding successfully?
At 2015-08-22 14:26:08, "Vikas Choudhary" wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I want to discuss on https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1348589.This is
there for more than a
there was another patch [1] fix the invalid CIDR for subnet.
thanks,
hanzhang, shi
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201942/
At 2015-08-22 03:33:26, "Jay Pipes" wrote:
>On 08/21/2015 02:34 PM, Sean M. Collins wrote:
>> So - the tl;dr is that I don't think that we should accept inputs l
2015-08-22 0:25 GMT+02:00 Davanum Srinivas :
> Folks,
>
> In the governance repo a number of libraries are marked with
> release:managed tag:
>
> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/projects.yaml
>
> However, some of these libraries do not have appropriate ACL in the
Taylor,
I am adding some IBMers who are also looking into making this work. PowerVC
has a solution hacked into place but we are working on getting a more
general solution implemented for Mitaka. Hoping we can all work together to
get a solution in place.
Will you be in Tokyo? If so, it would be g
On 08/21/2015 03:33 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 08/21/2015 02:34 PM, Sean M. Collins wrote:
>> So - the tl;dr is that I don't think that we should accept inputs like
>> the following:
>>
>> x -> 192
>> x/y -> 10/8
>> x.x/y -> 192.168/16
>> x.x.x/y -> 192.168.0/24
>>
>> which are equivalen
> -Original Message-
> From: melanie witt [mailto:melwi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 21 August 2015 02:02
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] feedback from the ops mid cycle summit
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I attended the ops mid cyc
>I am in favor not to go for a least common denominator approach with the
bgpvpn API. The API should cover the use case commonly acknowledged as
useful and which are supported by at least one of the existing back-ends,
with the aim to have various back-ends to grow in support coverage.
So then wha
On August 22, 2015 11:58:03 AM EDT, Monty Taylor wrote:
>On 08/21/2015 03:33 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> On 08/21/2015 02:34 PM, Sean M. Collins wrote:
>>> So - the tl;dr is that I don't think that we should accept inputs
>like
>>> the following:
>>>
>>> x -> 192
>>> x/y -> 10/8
>>> x.x/y
It's been over a week, so I'd like to welcome Brandon and Russell to the
API/DB/RPC team in Neutron!
Kyle
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> It gives me great pleasure to propose Russell Bryant and Brandon Logan as
> core reviewers in the API/DB/RPC area of Neutron. Russell
+1 To what Joshua said.
I would also like to understand what is the goal we are trying to
accomplish by moving this to a repo and submitting a CR and what does
this solve or improve on the current way we are doing things?
Will it reduce noise? marginally (IMHO).
Maish
On 08/22/15 06:02, Jos
Congrats to Russel and Blogan!
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> It's been over a week, so I'd like to welcome Brandon and Russell to the
> API/DB/RPC team in Neutron!
>
> Kyle
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>
>> It gives me great pleasure to propo
Congrats Brandon and Russel.
On Aug 22, 2015 13:37, "Miguel Lavalle" wrote:
> Congrats to Russel and Blogan!
>
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>
>> It's been over a week, so I'd like to welcome Brandon and Russell to the
>> API/DB/RPC team in Neutron!
>>
>> Kyle
>>
>> On W
Welcome to the team!
Cheers,
Edgar
On Aug 22, 2015, at 1:10 PM, Kyle Mestery
mailto:mest...@mestery.com>> wrote:
It's been over a week, so I'd like to welcome Brandon and Russell to the
API/DB/RPC team in Neutron!
Kyle
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Kyle Mestery
mailto:mest...@mestery.c
Excerpts from Ben Swartzlander's message of 2015-08-21 22:38:59 -0400:
>
> On 08/21/2015 06:25 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > In the governance repo a number of libraries are marked with
> > release:managed tag:
> > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference
Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2015-08-22 16:12:44 +0200:
> 2015-08-22 0:25 GMT+02:00 Davanum Srinivas :
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > In the governance repo a number of libraries are marked with
> > release:managed tag:
> >
> > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/p
New guys have to plan the liberty summit get together, right? :)
Doug
> On Aug 22, 2015, at 2:06 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>
> It's been over a week, so I'd like to welcome Brandon and Russell to the
> API/DB/RPC team in Neutron!
>
> Kyle
>
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Kyle Mestery wr
On 08/22/2015 04:35 PM, Maish Saidel-Keesing wrote:
> +1 To what Joshua said.
>
> I would also like to understand what is the goal we are trying to
> accomplish by moving this to a repo and submitting a CR and what does
> this solve or improve on the current way we are doing things?
The point whe
On 08/21/2015 11:02 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote:
> I'm struggling to think of a way this might help enable discussions between
> nominees and voters about their platforms. Since the tooling will send out
> the nomination announcements the only real noise that is reduced is the
> "nomination confirmed"
19 matches
Mail list logo
