On 2014-08-11 5:13 PM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
Right, I'm not suggesting to remove the storage abstraction layer. I'm
just curious what gnocchi does better/different than InfluxDB?
I was at the OpenStack Design Summit when Gnocchi was presented.
Soon after the basic goals and technical details of
Susanne,
Are you asking in the context of Load Balancer services in general, or in
terms of the Neutron LBaaS project or the Octavia project?
Stephen
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Doug Wiegley wrote:
> Hi Susanne,
>
> While there are a few operators involved with LBaaS that would have good
Hi stackers,
I would like to put some more details on current situation.
>
> The issue is with what Rally is in it's
> current form. It's scope is too large and monolithic, and it duplicates
> much of
> the functionality we either already have or need in current QA or Infra
> projects. But, noth
> >> On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> Hi Eoghan,
>
> Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does
> not
> cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged.
> Many
> folks feel that this technology is a via
I think the metadata in server group is an important feature and it might
be used by
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/soft-affinity-for-server-group
Actually, we are now doing an internal development for above bp and want to
contribute this back to community later. We are now setting ha
> Ignoring the question of is it ok to say: 'to run ceilometer in any sort of
> non-trivial deployment you must manager yet another underlying service,
> mongodb' I would prefer not adding an addition gate variant to all projects.
> With the effort to reduce the number of gate variants we have [0
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 13:35:44 -0700:
> On 11/08/14 14:49, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2014-08-11 11:40:07 -0700:
> >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:20:50AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >>> Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 09:06 -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
> > On 08/07/2014 08:06 PM, Michael Still wrote:
> > > It seems to me that the tension here is that there are groups who
> > > would really like to use features in newer libvirts th
On 11/08/14 15:24, Dan Prince wrote:
Hmmm. We blocked a good bit of changes to get these HOT templates in so
I hate to see us revert them. Also, It isn't clear to me how much work
it would be to fully support the non-HOT to HOT templates upgrade path.
How much work is this? And is that something
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>
>
> > Ignoring the question of is it ok to say: 'to run ceilometer in any sort
> of
> > non-trivial deployment you must manager yet another underlying service,
> > mongodb' I would prefer not adding an addition gate variant to all
> projects.
On 8 August 2014 07:55, Dean Troyer wrote:
> In cinderclient I think you're stuck with size as a mandatory argument to
> the 'cinder create' command, as you must be backward-compatible for at least
> a deprecation period.[0]
Making an previously mandatory parameter optional, at least on the
comma
On 12 August 2014 07:24, Dan Prince wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 06:58 +1200, Robert Collins wrote:
>> Hi, so shortly after the HOT migration landed, we hit
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1354305 which is that on even
>> quite recently deployed clouds, the migrated templates were jus
On 12 August 2014 10:27, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 11/08/14 15:24, Dan Prince wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm. We blocked a good bit of changes to get these HOT templates in so
>> I hate to see us revert them. Also, It isn't clear to me how much work
>> it would be to fully support the non-HOT to HOT templates up
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Ignoring the question of is it ok to say: 'to run ceilometer in any sort
>> > of
>> > non-trivial deployment you must manager yet another underlying service,
>> > mongodb'
On 12/08/14 06:20, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2014-08-11 08:16:56 -0700:
>> On 11/08/14 10:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
>>> Right now we're stuck with an update that just doesn't work. It isn't
>>> just about update-failure-recovery, which is coming along nicely, but
>>>
On 08/11/2014 05:58 PM, Jay Lau wrote:
I think the metadata in server group is an important feature and it
might be used by
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/soft-affinity-for-server-group
Actually, we are now doing an internal development for above bp and want
to contribute this back
Cisco Folks,
I don't see the CI for Cisco NX-OS anymore. Is this being deprecated?
Edgar
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 09/08/14 11:15, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 08/08/14 11:07, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
>> On 08/08/14 00:53, Zane Bitter wrote:
>>> On 07/08/14 13:22, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
Hi all,
I have a ResourceGroup which wraps a custom resource defined in
another
template:
ser
On 11/08/14 16:21, Matthew Treinish wrote:
I'm sorry, but the fact that the
docs in the rally tree has a section for user testimonials [4] I feel speaks a
lot about the intent of the project.
What... does that even mean?
"They seem like just the type of guys that would help Keystone with
perf
> >> So would we:
> >>
> >> (a) add a new integrated-gate-ceilometer project-template to [1],
> >> in the style of integrated-gate-neutron or integrated-gate-sahara,
> >> which would replicate the main integrated-gate template but with
> >> the addition of gate-tempest-dsvm-ceilom
On 08/11/2014 05:05 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
> Cisco Folks,
>
> I don't see the CI for Cisco NX-OS anymore. Is this being deprecated?
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/c
On 12 August 2014 08:35, Zane Bitter wrote:
> This sounds like the same figure I heard at the design summit; did the DB
> call optimisation work that Steve Baker did immediately after that not have
> any effect?
It helped a lot- I'm not sure where heat tops out now - I'm not aware
of rigorous be
John,
I spent the drive to the Minneapolis Airport thinking about this chain
of e-mails. Hope these thoughts help ...
On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 07:55 -0600, John Griffith wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Anne Gentle
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Devananda van der Veen <
devananda@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > Ignoring the question of is it ok to say: 'to run ceilometer i
Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 08/11/2014 05:05 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
>> Cisco Folks,
>>
>> I don't see the CI for Cisco NX-OS anymore. Is this being deprecated?
>>
> I don't ever recall seeing that as a name of a third party gerrit
> account in my list[0], Edgar.
>
> Do you happen to have a link to a
On 08/11/2014 05:46 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
> Anita Kuno wrote:
>> On 08/11/2014 05:05 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
>>> Cisco Folks,
>>>
>>> I don't see the CI for Cisco NX-OS anymore. Is this being deprecated?
>>>
>> I don't ever recall seeing that as a name of a third party gerrit
>> account in my li
Hey Cinder folks that have their CI systems up and running; first off...
awesome!!! I do have one favor to ask however though. Please, please,
please monitor your jobs and if they're not working either fix them or
disable them.
Currently the it seems that none of the implemented jobs are overly
On 8/11/2014 7:56 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
> On 08/11/2014 05:46 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
>> Anita Kuno wrote:
>>> On 08/11/2014 05:05 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
Cisco Folks,
I don't see the CI for Cisco NX-OS anymore. Is this being deprecated?
>>> I don't ever recall seeing that as a
On 8/11/2014 6:49 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>
On 8/11/2014 4:22 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>> Hi Eoghan,
>>
>> Thanks for the note below. However, one thing the overview below does
>> not
>> cover is why InfluxDB ( http://influxdb.com/ ) is not being leveraged.
>> Many
>
On 08/11/2014 06:31 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
> On 8/11/2014 7:56 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
>> On 08/11/2014 05:46 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
>>> Anita Kuno wrote:
On 08/11/2014 05:05 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
> Cisco Folks,
>
> I don't see the CI for Cisco NX-OS anymore. Is this being depre
On 08/11/2014 06:26 PM, John Griffith wrote:
> Hey Cinder folks that have their CI systems up and running; first off...
> awesome!!! I do have one favor to ask however though. Please, please,
> please monitor your jobs and if they're not working either fix them or
> disable them.
>
> Currently t
>>
>>
> Thanks Henry:
>
> Do we have a url for patch in gerrit for this or was this an internal
> code change?
I am in process of uploading a patch for the same, will update url here once i
get it.
Regards,
Pritesh
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Ope
Hi,
I won’t be able to make it tomorrow. Please feel free having the meeting
without me.
Thanks,
Robert
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Thanks, i was running older version of pip.
All the requirements were installed successfully.
Now getting the following error
sudo ./bin/congress-server --config-file etc/congress.conf.sample
2014-08-12 08:26:23.417 31129 CRITICAL congress.service [-] 'ascii' codec
can't decode byte 0xf3 in posi
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Duncan Thomas
wrote:
>
> Making an previously mandatory parameter optional, at least on the
> command line, does break backward compatibility though, does it?
> Everything that worked before will still work.
>
By itself, maybe that is ok. You're right, nothing _s
Thanks Jay Pipes! I see, but setting metadata for server group might be
more flexible to handle all of the policy cases, such as hard
affinity/anti-affinity, soft affinity/anti-affinity, topology
affinity/anti-affinity etc, we may have more use cases in future related to
server group metadata.
Reg
Hi Rajdeep,
I think the issue you're facing here is because you have a non-asci char in
your etc/congress.conf.sample file. Could you try the following commands:
mv congress/etc/congress.config.sample /tmp
git checkout congress/etc/config.sample
./bin/congress-server --config-file etc/congres
all,
is anyone seeing these failures in devstack -
create_keystone_accounts
2014-08-11 02:47:47.906 | ++ get_or_create_project admin
2014-08-11 02:47:47.908 | +++ openstack project show admin -f value -c id
2014-08-11 02:47:48.825 | +++ openstack project create admin -f value -c id
2014-08-11 02:4
1) Forklift status
a. Schedulier client library
b. Isolate Scheduler DB
2) Opens
--
Don Dugger
"Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.ope
Well, that exactly what we've tried to solve with tags in the flavor.
Considering your example with whole configuration being sent to the driver
- i think it will be fine to not apply unsupported parts of configuration
(like such HM) and mark the HM object with error status/status description.
Th
Hi John,
I guess this is w.r.t 3rd party cinder drivers.
I would like some guidance in this regards in form of some links, wiki
pages etc.
I am currently gathering the "driver cert test results" i.e. tempest tests
from devstack in our environment & CI setup would be my next step.
Regards,
Amit
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Thierry Carrez
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> With the incredible growth of OpenStack, our development community is
> >> facing co
I think the situation described by Doug is what most OpenStack newcomers
are facing. TBH, the company I work for(Catalyst IT Ltd, a NZ based open
source company) run into the same challenge, so we had to cook something
in our kitchen and are currently running it for our cloud service. The
differenc
Hi,
I'm now doing some investigation for docker + HEAT integration and come up
one question want to get your help.
What is the best way for a docker container to run some user data once the
docker container was provisioned?
I think there are two ways: using cloud-init or the "CMD" section in
Doc
On 12 August 2014 07:26, Amit Das wrote:
> I would like some guidance in this regards in form of some links, wiki
> pages etc.
>
> I am currently gathering the "driver cert test results" i.e. tempest tests
> from devstack in our environment & CI setup would be my next step.
>
This should get you
101 - 145 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
