On 13/12/13 22:40 +, Kurt Griffiths wrote:
FWIW, Marconi can easily deliver sub-second latency even with lots of
clients fast-polling. We are also considering a long-polling feature that
will reduce latency further for HTTP clients.
And there's already some work going on the `websocket` sid
I've been working on a POC in heat for resources which perform software
configuration, with the aim of implementing this spec
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/Blueprints/hot-software-config-spec
The code to date is here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/hot-software-config,n,z
What w
Thanks for the reply! Let me try and address one particular section for now,
since it seems to be the part causing the most confusion:
> > * SERVICE CLASS - a further categorization within a service role for a
> > particular deployment.
> >
> > * NODE PROFILE - a set of requi
On 12/14/2013 01:31 PM, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote:
> Thanks for the reply! Let me try and address one particular section for now,
> since it seems to be the part causing the most confusion:
>
>>> * SERVICE CLASS - a further categorization within a service role for a
>>> particular deployment.
On 14 December 2013 03:07, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 12/12/2013 04:46 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
>> Hi, I'm trying to overhaul the bug triage process for nova (initially)
>> to make it much lighter and more effective.
>>
>> I'll be sending a more comprehensive mail shortly
>
> before you do, let's
Thanks Mainn, comments inline :)
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 19:31 -0500, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote:
> Thanks for the reply! Let me try and address one particular section for now,
> since it seems to be the part causing the most confusion:
>
> > > * SERVICE CLASS - a further categorization within a se
I've now pulled out jobs from the gate queue on stable/grizzly for both
heat and keystone. The docs jobs are still broken in stable/grizzly on
both of those trees, which means that pushing a commit to the Gate will
100% fail.
But worse than that, what will actually happen is it will fail. Get
pull
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 04:30:17PM +0900,
Maru Newby wrote:
>
> On Dec 5, 2013, at 5:21 PM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:37:19PM +0900,
> > Maru Newby wrote:
> >
> >> In the current architecture, the Neutron service handles RPC and WSGI with
> >> a single process a
On 14 December 2013 09:50, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
> Is this set in stone? In other words, is it a given that in order to
> create the seed undercloud, that you need to use DIB to do it? Instead
> of an image that is pre-constructed and virsh'd into, what about
> constructing one or more LXC templates
> Thanks Mainn, comments inline :)
>
> On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 19:31 -0500, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply! Let me try and address one particular section for
> > now,
> > since it seems to be the part causing the most confusion:
> >
> > > > * SERVICE CLASS - a further categori
On Dec 13, 2013 12:20 PM, "Eric Windisch" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Chuck Short
wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have definitely seen a drop off in the proposed Container-Service API
discussion
>
>
> There was only one action item from the meeting, which was a compilation
of use-cases f
Hi All,
At present cinder driver can be only configured with adding entries in conf
file. Once these driver related entries are modified or added in conf file,
we need to restart cinder-volume service to validate the conf entries and
create a child process that runs in background.
I am thinking o
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
