On 13/12/13 22:40 +0000, Kurt Griffiths wrote:
FWIW, Marconi can easily deliver sub-second latency even with lots of clients fast-polling. We are also considering a long-polling feature that will reduce latency further for HTTP clients.
And there's already some work going on the `websocket` side[0]. It's still pretty much an experiment since its completion depends on some features that are under development. Targeting i-2. Cheers, FF [0] https://github.com/FlaPer87/marconi-websocket
On 12/13/13, 2:41 PM, "Fox, Kevin M" <kevin....@pnnl.gov> wrote:A second or two of latency perhaps shaved off by using something like AMQP or STOMP might not be justified for its added complexity._______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco
pgpenpe0mypSS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
