Re: [openstack-dev] Reg : Security groups implementation using openflows in quantum ovs plugin

And what do you think about the performance issue I talked ? Do you have any thought to improve wildcarding to use megaflow feature ? Édouard. On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Zang MingJie wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Jian Wen wrote: >> I don't think we can implement a stateful fir

[openstack-dev] [tempest] list of negative tests that need to be separated from other tests.

Hi! I understand that one action toward negative tests, even before implementing the automatic schema generation, is to move them to their own file (.py), thus separating them from the 'positive' tests. (See patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56807/ as an example). In order to do so, I'v

Re: [openstack-dev] Working with Vagrant and packstack

On Friday, November 29, 2013 2:16:23 AM, Peeyush Gupta wrote: Hi all, I have been trying to set up an openstack environment using vagrant and packstack. I provisioned a Fedora-19 VM through vagrant and used a shell script to take care of installation and other things. The first thing that she

Re: [openstack-dev] Working with Vagrant and packstack

Agreed with Matt, openstack-dev channel designed for developers discusions. Please find a better place for asking such questions (forums, blogs, etc.) 2013/11/30 Matt Riedemann > > > On Friday, November 29, 2013 2:16:23 AM, Peeyush Gupta wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have been trying to set up an

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] maintenance policy for code graduating from the incubator

On 11/29/2013 03:58 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Sandy Walsh > wrote: > > So, as I mention in the branch, what about deployments that haven't > transitioned to the library but would like to cherry pick this featur

[openstack-dev] [nova] why are we backporting low priority v3 api fixes to v2?

I've seen a few bugs/reviews like this [1] lately which are essentially backporting fixes from the nova openstack v3 API to the v2 API. While this is goodness for the v2 API, I'm not sure why we're spending time on low priority bug fixes like this for the v2 API when v3 is the future. Shouldn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] why are we backporting low priority v3 api fixes to v2?

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I've seen a few bugs/reviews like this [1] lately which are essentially > backporting fixes from the nova openstack v3 API to the v2 API. While this > is goodness for the v2 API, I'm not sure why we're spending time on low > priority bug fixe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Stop logging non-exceptional conditions as ERROR

On Nov 28, 2013, at 1:08 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > Thanks Maru, > > This is something my team had on the backlog for a while. > I will push some patches to contribute towards this effort in the next few > days. > > Let me know if you're already thinking of targeting the completion of thi

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Summit session wrapup

I think we may all be approaching the planning of this project in the wrong way, because of confusions such as: > Well, I think there is one small misunderstanding. I've never said that > manual way should be primary workflow for us. I agree that we should lean > toward as much automation and sm

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Oslo] Future of Key Distribution Server, Trusted Messaging

Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2013-11-25 20:25:50 -0800: > Back in the Day, Barbican was just one Service of Cloud Keep. While I > would say that KDS belongs in the Cloud Keep, it is not the same as, and > should not be deployed with Barbican. Is it possible to keep them as > separate

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][hadoop][template] Does anyone has a hadoop template

Excerpts from Jay Lau's message of 2013-11-28 16:48:41 -0800: > Hi, > > I'm now trying to deploy a hadoop cluster with heat, just wondering if > someone who has a heat template which can help me do the work. Hi Jay, this is off topic for the openstack-dev mailing list. Please re-post your questi